Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey im a Nissan lover from way back, but perhaps its a boring review of a boring car. I mean it sounds crappy, is very stable...and it was privately owned. So...good review of a boring car???

Give the thing some pipes and a button that turns off all the gizmos and see how balanced the thing is. Its like the modern super fighters, without their computers the things wouldnt fly let alone perform the way they do. The computers make them, dont complement them. Thats what i am feeling about the R35.

Not trying to sound like a hater....but its about what i expected it to be, very complimentry review for a great performing car. Just like years ago when Top Gear, Clarkson, Harvey and Burns all test drove a bunch of cars (911, 575, Elise, 3000GTO etc) and the R33 was fastest...yet didnt even make the top 3 or talked about that much. Brilliant cars dont make for good fun...not always

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Clarkson loved all all the old Godzillas. There is no reason why the R35 should be any different. Its faster, built better, handles better, light years ahead in technology and is priced similiarly (taking inflation into account).

yeh, i remember clarkson doing the other reviews on the GTR's and that one JUN did they tossed a bunch of cash at and he said other than the gauges the car was an animal.

i do think the fifth gear review was alittle boring for a car that had huge expectations from the media/public, setting the times it did on the nurburgring was quite impressive, they way they hiped the adds up and at the start of the episode was like it was a new amazing car that we had never seen before, but then the review came and i felt alittle disapointed with his review. felt alittle rushed.

but thats my opinion.

It was a privately owned car.

No doubt everyone is waiting on Clarksons review because he will say what you want to hear.

Thats what i think :D Ppl would say its an excellent review of Plato had a big hand feed and creamed over how good it was. He gave the car a big rap....perhaps he just wasnt as fan biy about it as many loyal Nissan folk woudl have liked. :)

How the F... did you all miss the most important part of hte review... Did you SEE the downshift ... it wasnt high revs but they creamed the shit out of allot of expensive dsg's.... Made me quite horny

How the F... did you all miss the most important part of hte review... Did you SEE the downshift ... it wasnt high revs but they creamed the shit out of allot of expensive dsg's.... Made me quite horny

Sounds a lot better in the flesh... The audio should have been setup to hear the engine note better too as it was too quiet in the episode.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...