Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey im kyle and going on my P's. i was wondering to find out some info from real skyline inthusists that will know some info from experience. i was currently looking at buying a r32 GTS-T but finding out it is quiet hard and not so cheap on getting the turbo disconnected. so i was wondering wat would be a good option thats under 200kw and r33???? im just trying to find out as much as possible so i can nail it down to one skyline to do some homework on. if ne ideas plz get bak to me would really appreciate it.

murf

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205569-finding-out-some-info/
Share on other sites

what do you mean by getting the turbo disconnected? are you after a non-turbo r32 or r33?

ohh i wouldnt mind a GTS-T r32 if possible but they are turbo. but defintaly without a turbo for either skyline

can get both r32 and r33 skylines in a non-turbo version, just hunt round

yeh i have been looking recently and found a 1993 r33 gts-t series 1 and it was a non turbo. so u can get r32 gtst in non turbo i never realised that i thought it was stock fitted with all of them, my mistake then. do you recommend any distinctive sites to look at???

i am a p plater driving a non turbo r33 1997 series 2

still goes very very hard

ive kept up with turbo skylines till about 80/90ks then once i hit 3rd gear they just thrash me

but its still a very very quick car and a lot more fun to drive then a commo

i am a p plater driving a non turbo r33 1997 series 2

still goes very very hard

ive kept up with turbo skylines till about 80/90ks then once i hit 3rd gear they just thrash me

but its still a very very quick car and a lot more fun to drive then a commo

how much did that end up costing you???? i havent seen a serious 2 non turbo yet well i havent come across one on the net yet. how many kw is it????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...