Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i just saw the Z tune was pulling 1.01.115 seconds around tsukuba which is pretty much the same as the R35 GT-R.. Althou the R35- GT-R was stock. So i can't wait to see the NISMO R35 with atleast 600PS by the end of this year surely! I still think the R34 Z tune looks nicer thou!

The Z-tune is old hat.

Get ready for some brutal Nismo insanity. They're under pressure to be da tuning boss for the R35, i'm expecting something hardcore (bigger power+lower weight) yet balanced (chassis wise).

Think 'road legal Super GT racer', imagine that freakin' bodykit and all the carbon...*cringes with excitement*

I'm pizzling my dizzle just thinking about it :D

Edited by R338OY
Yeh i would take a Z tune over a standard new R35. Those Z tunes will be soooooo rare, and 30 years down the track will be commanding a rediculous price

will be so rare ? theres already only 20 of them lol

and they do the 1/4 in 10.04 secs and have a brake G Force of -1.6G's

and they are already or should i say... have always commanded ridiculous money.. but its worth it.

Its a super car killer in almost every aspect ;)

if my shitty rx7 race car can reel off a mid 10 with semi's and 400hp...then a 500hp 4wd race launchin @ 9000rpm can do the same. twice as much traction with more power and lot more torque.. no problems

and that 10.04 wasnt the nismo time... it was the time recorded by an aussie block who owns a Z tune

Nismo reeled off an offical 10.4sec 1/4.. forgot to add that haha :)

Edited by Bumblebee

hmmm very very tough ... if oyu take the ztune you will be forever worried about , you wont want to rack up the k's on it and will be expensive to maintain. Or take the r35 have some luxury but not quite as fast.. think ill take the r35 , just.

I think it going to take a while for people to "get use to" and actually like the r35gtr, i mean i love its agressive stance and the looks it brings to the skyline family, it has taken a rounder shape but kept some original features like the tail lights etc. Power wise and handling wise, for a stock car it is more than amazing, the z-tune is a wikid car with it's total package and agressive styling however wait untill aftermarket tuning companies bring out parts for the r35gtr, it is going to be one hell of a car...you can bet on that.

hame

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...