Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I got my series 2 stagea stock as and was getting about 350ks a tank, so i had a carbon clean done on the fuel system cost me $120 and i was then getting 450km to 550km a tank then I had aftermarket ecu, intercooler, fuel pressure regulator, splitfire ignition coils, 3 inch mandrel turbo back exhaust, eboost2 running 14 psi, 500hp intank fuel pump, apexi power intake, and now i get around 300kms to 350kms a tank now I want to sell the beast.

I got my series 2 stagea stock as and was getting about 350ks a tank, so i had a carbon clean done on the fuel system cost me $120 and i was then getting 450km to 550km a tank then I had aftermarket ecu, intercooler, fuel pressure regulator, splitfire ignition coils, 3 inch mandrel turbo back exhaust, eboost2 running 14 psi, 500hp intank fuel pump, apexi power intake, and now i get around 300kms to 350kms a tank now I want to sell the beast.

hey ben you sound like your driving like your username suggests, but on a more serious note i hope your not running 14psi on a std turbo, and have you had the car tuned since doing mods, fuel usage is way to high , if your driving hard ok consumption is always gunna be shit, but with your mods and tuned properly you should be doing better than that,

anyway hope you sus it out rather than sell it,

goodluck leigh.

I just filled up 59.91lt to the brim, I had done 407k's and it works out to about 14.7/100k's after my first full tank on my stag (only just got it :nyaanyaa: )

thats with a bit of a lead foot throughout the whole tank.... :cheers:

my question is - when the empty light comes on - how many litres does that mean it has left in the tank??

when the empty light came on in my 34 i had 15lt left in the tank......

Edited by FULOCK

well then i must try and drive my car till it get really low. i have only ever been able to squze 55 lt into my car whenever i have filled it up and i normally have driven anywhere from 450 to just over 500 km when i fill up. it seems to me that there is still a fair bit of fuel left when the gauge reads empty.

FULOCK i usually always put fuel in once the light comes on and I always get 58L in... so if the tank is 68L (as said a couple of posts before yours :D) then you'd have 10 ltrs once the fuel light comes on.

Edited by StageaGirl
hey ben you sound like your driving like your username suggests, but on a more serious note i hope your not running 14psi on a std turbo, and have you had the car tuned since doing mods, fuel usage is way to high , if your driving hard ok consumption is always gunna be shit, but with your mods and tuned properly you should be doing better than that,

anyway hope you sus it out rather than sell it,

goodluck leigh.

Yeah had it tuned and yes i am running 14psi on standard turbo was told that was the maximum it could handle. I have wondered if I should take it to someone else to see if it has been tuned do you know of anyone i live on the gold coast

Yeah had it tuned and yes i am running 14psi on standard turbo was told that was the maximum it could handle. I have wondered if I should take it to someone else to see if it has been tuned do you know of anyone i live on the gold coast

Hey buddy just reiterating what others have said.

14psi is what it takes to pretty much kill the turbo instantly. You'd want to step down from 14 a fair bit to make it safe enough to last.

I had mine on 11psi and I think you'll find most people on here keep it around 10-11psi with the stock turbo.

Replacing the turbo with something as good or better is going to be an expensive operation but you do have options and the cost varies from ~$1000 to ~$2500 depending on what you want...and the more expensive ones aren't always better. :P

Mine was averaging 13-14L/100km on the standard turbo (8psi) and 10L/100km on the highway.

Try to get it fixed a bit before selling it cos it will really harm your sale price if the fuel economy isn't great.

I have a M35 Stage and arount town I get about 14L / 100 and on the highway I average 10L / 100

I've done 2 full tanks in city driving (90% of the time just feathering the gas pedal). Both occasions have clocked 500kms which is about 6.25 kms per litre of fuel, or 16L/100kms.

For a later model engine, i think that's pretty pathetic. One of the reasons why I sold my R34 was to get something that gives you good mileage. It's certainly disappointed me so far..

Another note. Spoke to Tony from North Shore Prestige where I got the car from. He suggested a few things to increase economy.

- change plugs

- clean injectors (if they do need cleaning but unlikely he said)

- clean the afm

- get an ebc so you can wind down the boost to say 5 pounds when you dont need the power.

- dont drive with a heavy foot, which im not anyway.

Another note. Spoke to Tony from North Shore Prestige where I got the car from. He suggested a few things to increase economy.

- change plugs

- clean injectors (if they do need cleaning but unlikely he said)

- clean the afm

- get an ebc so you can wind down the boost to say 5 pounds when you dont need the power.

- dont drive with a heavy foot, which im not anyway.

I am getting around 7.5km/litre around town and if I can get some highway driving in (M2 or M5) I am getting this up to 7.8 - 8.0. It is driving a bit like an old lady and not being in a hurry but even when pushing a bit harder I can still get 7.5. The difference seems to be if you can keep moving. The stop start traffic kills the economy.

Cheers

Andy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, but the narrowband is truly narrowband. So you take it out of the linear zone and it is effectively nonsense. And that linear zone is so literally narrow, that nonsense is not very far away. Unless they are flicking back and forth across the stoich point, for real, under actual control, they can't be trusted for anything except entertainment value.
    • I agree, and yet my "HRM " hat is also on, as his wideband is in disagreement with the narrowband where they used to play closer attention to each other.
    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
×
×
  • Create New...