Jump to content
SAU Community

Modifying Stock R33 Airbox/snorkel Or Entirely Custom


Recommended Posts

I want to keep my intake similar to the stock setup (ie enclosed, fed from the front of the engine bay) but I don't want a pod. I hate the noise, and want to avoid the legal ramifications.

I've seen some made for V8/LS1 engines which look like I want.. big wide open mouth taking up as much space as possible where the bonnet meets the chassis, kinda like the stock air snorkel but much larger opening at the front. I'd also like to modify how the snorkel feeds into the airbox - if I've made the changes just explained, the join into the airbox will be the next bottleneck.

I'm going to buy a spare snorkel/top half of the aribox. Can someone tell me what I need to make these changes? I've heard of plastic welding... do I need to do that?

Thanks for any help in advance. Also open to going completely custom if I can get the materials and the know-how to do it fromt scratch, but would prefer to use the stock box and modify it, cos then at least it will look stock-ish. I'd like to use the same kind of material at the very least.

I also spoke to a (/the) dude that was going to do that a while ago ;) From memory, he ended up going pod lol

That's pretty much what I'd like to do though. I just realised a mate has done fibreglass work for audio installs - going to see if he can make something. And yeah: I want it looking like stock. Matt black and boring!

Edited by sl33py

Will do! Mate says it'll take a few days.

But from previous reading, I think the GTR intake is better than the GTST... It's larger. In fact, I think the intake I end up with could look very similar to the stock GTR one. Anyway, we'll see.

The primary reason a GTR33 airbox has so much potential is there is an extra inlet to the airbox through the side inner guard. Mine currently makes 320rwkw on the stock airbox and I'll soon push that over 400rwkw. It can't be done the same with a stock RB25 box, but I've seen a large improvement in simply removing the top out of the airbox on the auto 33 I had and sealing it to allow frontal airfeed only. Unfortunately the lower area of the airbox is not particularly good so on my race car (33 GTS25t with RB26/30) I custom made the new airbox to be where the stock cooler is with a stock panel filter in the front, bellmouth pickup inside and a vented front on the bumper will follow to allow direct air intake.

Great idea, worth the effort. With a high flow panel filter and this Julia Roberts mouth drawing in air you'll be able to drastically minimise restriction without getting a defect.

Cool geoff. I think I saw a picture of that. Changing the filter must be a hassle though? So far I'm just thinking of modifying the top section of the airbox and the snorkel. Also... I'm not keen on having the air filter so low to the ground. I'm in Canberra lol In Brissie and on a race car I'm sure it's fine though!

Edited by sl33py

I lived in Canberra for 5 years. I'd have it the same there but yes it is a race car, and I intend to make filter changes easier by making a louvered front panel held on with dzus fasteners http://www.my105.com/catalogue.asp?id=4558 or the like.

Pods though are not as good as people think.

I've used HKS pods and they let a lot of muck through in some designs plus filter poorly. A mate just had a turbo destroyed by a Blitz that let gravel in where he mounted it. About the only foolproof ones are Apexi and even then without a topnotch enclosure they are subject to too much hot air. Calculate how much air is taken in in eack cycle of the engine, then times that by RPM then wonder how much enters every minute. Compare that to the size of the engine bay and no surprise they will be sucking a massive amount of hot air.

I hate pods, but I'm only an engineer specialising in race setups and weapons systems.......

Read my original post ACTIVE32. Thanks anyway.

heheheh Geoff :P I'd be worried about the filter getting soaked when it p1sses down.. Mine's a daily driver.

One thing that came up yesterday - my mechanic said if I'm going to experiment with modifying the top half of the airbox and the snorkel, I don't need to get it retuned or anything afterwards. I asked cos I'm getting a new turbo (HKS GTRS) and all the other bits at once and want it all perfect.

If I muck about after the tune, will it be like when you add a better exhaust and don't do anything to the ECU - it'll adjust automatically to make use of the better flow (by extrapolation with load point data and using the AFM I guess)?

Adz, I found the pics here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ai...gtrgeoff+filter post #14.

Edited by sl33py

Definitely interested to see what your mate comes up with...I'm interested in something like the pics I posted.

As for tuning, I had my car dynoed at my workshop in normal trim, and then straight after with the top of the airbox removed. There was a change in afr and some knocking, so to run like that it would have needed the tune adjusted.

Woah... You're tune must have been cutting it close WRT fuel supply? I sort of expect the engine should have room to move (supply more fuel) if a mod like this is done to supply (what probably isn't a whole lot) more air, and to supply the extra fuel needed. Hmmm. I guess it would depend on how much room there is in the tune and how much more the fuel pump and injectors can give.

I guess it would depend on how much room there is in the tune and how much more the fuel pump and injectors can give.

Would depend on how "on the limit" it was the start off with too.

I wouldn't have thought a air box mod would change fuel requirements all that much, alas agree with you. Get it tuned after all your mods are done.

OK, well after about 3 hours of bvggering about with cardboard and getting nowhere, I've come to the conclusion that it's probably easier to get hold of a spare airbox and snorkel and modify them, if only to come up with a mold to make fibreglass copies.

Anyone think a soldering iron with digital control which can go up to ~300 deg C would do the job of a plastic welder? And anyone think that plastic plumbing pipe would work to make an airbox? If not, maybe I'll just make a mold using it. What I'm really after is a material easy enough to work with that I can easily make a mold out of, or cheap and sturdy enough that I can actually make a permanent airbox out from. Gonna go look at Bunnings etc this morning.

Edited by sl33py

i used a cheapie direct plug in soldering iron to plastic weld, so that adjustable one will work.

you'll need to try and get a hold of some filler rod for the plastic welding .. or use off cuts as filler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...