Jump to content
SAU Community

Hot Version 91 - (r35gtr Vs R34, R33, R32 Tuners)


malinmc
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice brag'n rights for those of us with "old school" GTR's now :P

Yeah but the 32 wasnt in the same category IMO, it needed some GT-RS's or a TO4Z instead of the GT-SS's (if my memory serves me) it had - they sucked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i cant get any of those links to work, im assuming these are the cars ur talking about though

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lh4Jv4E9_Ac

i was hoping the 32 could do better :teehee: o well's at least it gave em a run for their money

we got any fluent japanese people :) did they adjust the 4wd torque settings in the 32. im under the impression thats the main disadvantage of the 32 its tail happy nature from less power to the front wheels

where in the vid does the 33 hit the 34? they seem to be running these laps by themselves from what i can see, i miss something?

no kpg gtr time :D

Edited by gzilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

im under the impression thats the main disadvantage of the 32 its tail happy nature from less power to the front wheels

Nah

Watch it again, read what turbos it had, then watch the others with real turbos pull away from it.

It needed more power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice watching it now

also heres a link of all four of them in a race http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7FxSS8oUZs...feature=related

the R35 came 3rd but the drivers of the tuned 32,33 and 34 seem to struggle a bit more when driving their cars where as the R35 driver was pretty calm and composed lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What more can you ask for in a video?

Bloody loved the R33, my pick of the lot. The MCR R34 was the weapon though, awesome track car.

Interesting how easy it is for the R35 to calmly keep up with monster GTRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...