Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep! Both Freebaggin & myself have LT12 plug-in ECU's. We’ve had them for sometime now.

My ECU took very little time to get tuned thanks to Freebaggins map being loaded into my ECU & then tweaked to suit my upgraded turbo/fuel system (1.5hrs tuning). After one more small on-road fine tune (15mins worth) my car now runs beautifully! The power curve is smooth, even better than my previous Unichip could manage. This is mostly due to the piggyback nature of the UC. The UC can't overcome the stock ECU AFM commanded ignition retard that GTS25t's suffer once you start making decent power & the airflow maxes out the AFM.

Both Freebaggin's car & mine run new inlet set-ups as we no longer need to run AFM's.

The LT12 has a very impressive range of datalogging info. It can also be tuned via both laptop, or the optional hand controller (also acts as a display/logger). I don't currently have a HC but it's only a few hundred $. Freebaggin can give you more info on the HC as he's got one.

In my case we had to run an extra wire to get everything up & running, it also took a bit of time to iron out a few bugs with the "LT12 to stock loom" adapter plug, so it wasn't a quite as simple as a PFC. But Freebaggin’s car & then my car were the first to have the new LT12 GTS25t Microtech fitted so it was still in the trial stage (in fact the photos in HPI are of my engine bay & Freebaggins inlet set-up).

The LT12 ECU's are now fully sorted & offer a true local plug-in option that's somewhat cheaper than "most" other options.

Since the fine tuning work my car has no problems with cold starts, idles fine, drives perfect, has zero problems with a vent to atmo’ BOV, & thanks to a few other mod’s makes 236rwkw on 14psi. It can even give the odd slightly modified GT-R a run for it’s money :(

I’m sure Freebaggin will be able to add more valueable info but if there’s any specific questions then ask away :)

Matt.

Whatisname, I think you've covered most it.

I think with all the half reasonable prog ECU systems on offer, the WOT peak power and power curve that can be gained would all be within the same ballpark, from Microtech to Motec M800. The piggyback options are less successful for this I think.

However it's the other nice things that then make a difference like purchase cost, installation ease (cost), fuel consumption, part throttle drivability, idle quality, upgradability etc. It becomes a compromise.

Here is what I think the advantages and disadvantages of the plug-in Microtech are.

Adv.

*Low cost

*Laptop tunable and data logging

*Plugin (except for air temp sensor install)

*No AFM

*Very cheap hand controller (~$150-160) that also datalogs to a point and indicates all the major functions

*Pretty attractive Dash display including shift light and also most hand controller functions ($500)

*High degree of upgrade flexibility (extra injectors, NOS, boost controller, injectors of any resistance OK etc all controlled from one ECU)

*Potential of system not fully realised with software upgrades on the way for increased tunability as well as modular additions

Disadv.

*Increase in fuel consumption (non closed loop may be contributing to this)

*Load and set point number lower that most other ECUs

*I still have some flat spots that are difficult to tune out so still more tweaking required (however Whatisname has little or no probs)

Anyway, I'm very happy. But the main thing, is that I have only started and I'm looking forward to a trouble free power upgrade path due the Microtech flexibility and also the contstant upgrades that are in the wind for the LT-12.

Cheers,

Freebaggin.

Good stuff Lachlan! I knew you'd jump in with some excellent info :)

A few quick things to mention with 2 of the disadvantages Freebaggin mentioned.

*Fuel consumption - I did a cruise with the local Adelaide SA guys recently, afterwards we were talking about fuel usage, it turned out that I hadn't used much more than a fellow GTS25t owner on the cruise, his car makes less power & still uses the stock ECU. I’ll admit my economy isn't quite as good as when I had the UC fitted, but the power/driveability have both improved.

*Flat spots/general driveability - Like Freebaggin pointed out, I've been really happy with the driveability of the car since getting some on-road tuning done, & I've never experienced any flat spots.

INASNT,

Some of the reasons I did not pursue the Power FC:

*No data logging available at present

*Non laptop programmable at present

*Injector type limited to factory resistor specs (expensive items usually)

*Not possible to control extra fuel injectors, water injection or NOS from ECU

*AFM still required at present

*Load and set point number only marginally better 20/20 I think compared 16/16.

*Expensive

*Boost controller expensive

*Hand controller expensive

*Limited local Apexi support

etc

So eventually Tim at RPM and I decided to see if a plug-in Microtech could be developed and here we are.

Please correct me with any points, but they were some of the issues I had with the Power FC when I was deciding what ECU to get. However as you say some of those issues may change over time with for eg. English software may become available etc.

Quote Freebaggin:

*Increase in fuel consumption (non closed loop may be contributing to this)

-----

I was under the impression that the Microtech L12 was closed loop.

Well thats what Tim told me or is for some reason yours isn't running closed loop? :)

-----

Meggala if the AF's were all in order wouldn't the emissions be in order also?!?!

Or is there more to it other than just not running rich or lean?

*whatsisname*

I’ll admit my economy isn't quite as good as when I had the UC fitted, but the power/driveability have both improved

I have his UC..

economywise, gain around 15-25kms more as I get around 230km to 1/2 tank.

power/driveability/fuel consumption hampered a bit by atmo BOV but otherwise an excellent budget upgrade.

Hi Nath :(

Yep agree with you on the UC mate, it's a very good unit. It's "spot on" with fuel consumption & driveability. If only the damn factory ECU ignition timing retard didn't start rearing it's ugly head once power gets over ~220-230rwkw :O

The UC driveability only declined when the stock ECU started to play silly buggers with timing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The hot exhaust light will come on not from just the cat being blocked, but it's just a temp sensor, and it's designed to warn you to not do things like park in long grass.   If you've been pushing the motor a bit, it can cause the light to come on.   Second if the cat is rattling, I'd suspect it's not blocked, but instead falling apart inside.   The easiest "fix" until you can get a cat put back in, is to unbolt your one, bash the rest of the insides out, and then bolt it back in.   For a daily driver/street car, I am in agreeance of put a cat in the car. If it were race car I wouldn't care if it were removed.
    • No worries at all 🫡 I think the most satisfying things to make are the little bits that are just impossible to find or they're no longer manufactured. Generally I always try to replace parts with OEM wherever possible. This little project is also great because it'll never see the light of day, but strengthen these brackets so it's not just relying on the little standard screws in the headlight plastic. As soon as I saw the standard brackets and screws I thought, "well I'm not going to install with just the screws, the plastic tabs will just snap off". It's crazy how expensive everything has become yeah. But I suppose that's supply and demand; granted it's a lot easier to get brand new genuine parts these days which is fantastic 😊, I don't have to get totally reamed at the local Nissan dealer ha ha We sure are lucky we have all these manufacturers making parts these days, a few really great Australian companies too like Platinum Racing Products and Fit Mint Automotive, what a time to be alive ❤️ . I've got my eye on the RB26 head by PRP as mine has a very fine hairline crack, so that'll need to be addressed some time in the future. If you have any requests or odd things to make feel free to let me know and I can have a crack at making replacement parts ✌️
    • Thanks for sharing this, and BTW if your headlights are in good condition they are worth thousands....you might want to consider replacing them with brand new LED ones like this (https://www.nengun.com/78works/full-led-headlights-r32-skyline) and making enough profit to buy a house in Sydney
    • I'm not sure what sort of shops are nearby, but I'd expect any reasonable exhaust shop could put a cat in it that will not restrict the power that engine makes. Otherwise, if you want to remove it, short lengths that replace the cat are readily available online, search for "de-cat pipes" or "test pipes"  
    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
×
×
  • Create New...