Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have stared another thread but want to keep this concise.

R33GTST making 247rwkw.

Ran perfectly on the dyno and for the first week.

Now at about 5800- 5900rpm the boost drops from 18psi to 4psi (i.e. massive boost drop)

Turbo is a gcg highflow with an enlarged wastegate hole and flap for better boost control.

I have a turbotech bleed valve, also tried a simple T off to bleed boost to achieve 1 bar. Still the same problem.

Occassionally it does hold boost to redline.

It has an Rb20 actuator (holds about 0.6 bar - 9psi without boost controller).

It will hold the 9psi to redline. It will also hold 11-12 psi to redline. As soon as you boost to about 14psi the massive boost drop occurs.

Intake has been checked for leaks, cat appeared ok.

The 2 suspects are the actuator and the centre muffler.

I'm thinking of getting/buying a HKS actuator or an rb25 one to test.

It's as if the wastegate gets pushed wide open ~ 6000rpm and 15+ psi. Anybody seen one fail this way?

I have also done a lot of other checks. The tuner was a bit surprised at the problem but didnt have time to put it on the dyno.

Cheers

Edited by benl1981
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206244-high-rpm-boost-loss/
Share on other sites

No, pretty sure its not a boost controller issue as it is holding less than the wastegate actuator pressure when boost is raised.

The intake pipe has the 10cm of metal stuck in the middle so I dont think it is that.. but yeah it does sound like the symptoms

Ordered a HKS actuator to see if that is the cure..

Edited by benl1981

Solved.

Problem was my modified air snorkel. I cut some out to create room for FMIC pipe. Sealed it up but not as free flowing.

On the dyno it was ok since less restriction with bonnet open.

It was strange that it was ok for a while. Maybe I didnt really push it over 6k before.

Took air snorkel off (still standard air box). Making just over 14psi at 6500rpm..

Edited by benl1981

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...