Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yahoo!

because mines an odd length, do you think i'd need to send it away to get it measured properly? or could it be done without sending it away?

i was wanting to do this when i was holding the one kris put in the Mines 34gtr out here it was quiet nice!

Yahoo!

because mines an odd length, do you think i'd need to send it away to get it measured properly? or could it be done without sending it away?

Or.................. *you* could measure it up? :ninja::)

For $2k landed, put me down for one (R32 GTR) if anyone is going to organise a group buy :)

:merli:

yeah i think i will pull it out today and get the woman to measure it up.. haha

a group buy is on order!! i'd organise it if we can get a few numbers!

ok

i've emailed them for prices on 10, 20 and 30.

Edited by Angus Smart
surely some people will want this?

maybe we can do a dyno test before and after carbon shaft.

there would be a difference correct?

No. Or atleast there shouldn't be. The only reason to record a difference would be if the dyno wasn't being set up or run correctly.

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

"We" being.......... who exactly?

Indicative time frame till production?

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

ok interesting.. yes Moar details!

the us dollar is looking pretty sweet right now Atcp may have our business!

wouldn't the map look more responsive with a carbon shaft installed?

No.

There are bundles of misunderstandings about light weight drive train components. Some people reckon they destroy the driveability & low range torque of a motor.

Others believe the low rotational inertia produces masses more acceleration.

What is true that if the lower drive train inertia isn't factored into the dyno readings it will give a false, high, output number.

Also true is that a lightweight driveshaft (much like its flywheel equivalent) will reduce the amount of energy (or horsepower over time if you like) required to accelerate the car. Whether this is important or significant depends on a bundle of factors. I would suspect that a good carbon drive shaft would have a small & perhaps measureable effect.

We being RAF Engineering.

WA based company.

Can't give exact date on production run start but should be with in 2 months total. I want to ensure full testing, safety and material QS are above what is currently avaliable.

NATA will be doing some of our final testing.

Website will be up in in 3 weeks.

We are also making billet / carbon fibre Lat links too.

Also as stated above Atcp will be a lower spec then the one we will producing.

Also we are a australian based company using australian made raw materials.

PM box is full send emails to [email protected]

ok interesting.. yes Moar details!

the us dollar is looking pretty sweet right now Atcp may have our business!

USD is actually pretty average at the moment. the AUD is going pretty well though (which I gather is what you mean?).

a carbon shaft will most likely have less effect than a lightweight clutch and flywheel. it's simple nerd talk. flywheel and clutch are large diameter out from the crank, which means any benefit of lightening way out there is multiplied. one of the gingerbeers on here can explain it more succintly i'm sure. but with the shaft being quite small in diameter the weight removed is not far out from that centre of rotation. the plus side is you do save a fair bit of weight.

and seriously I reckon 2 or 3 max would be in on this.

USD is actually pretty average at the moment. the AUD is going pretty well though (which I gather is what you mean?).

a carbon shaft will most likely have less effect than a lightweight clutch and flywheel. it's simple nerd talk. flywheel and clutch are large diameter out from the crank, which means any benefit of lightening way out there is multiplied. one of the gingerbeers on here can explain it more succintly i'm sure. but with the shaft being quite small in diameter the weight removed is not far out from that centre of rotation. the plus side is you do save a fair bit of weight.

and seriously I reckon 2 or 3 max would be in on this.

Does that make me a ginger beer or a nerd, Baron? Maybe both.

The term you are seeking is the polar moment of inertia. J for short. For a hollow round section

Polar moment of inertia = pi/32 multiplied by (outside diameter to the fourth power - inside diameter to the fourth power)

Anyway for a small increase in diameter you get a big increase in torque transmission capacity.

On the flip side the metal at the centre of the shaft is doing next to fk all.

Question to Syslink. Which NATA accredited mob are you getting to do your testing, not Metlabs by chance?

Edited by djr81

either way its still weight i want to get rid of as thats my main goal for now.

and on the plus side, single piece shaft rather than the current.

and barron, a light weight clutch/flywheel would be somewhere 5x (+++) the cost of the shaft correct?

either way its still weight i want to get rid of as thats my main goal for now.

and on the plus side, single piece shaft rather than the current.

and barron, a light weight clutch/flywheel would be somewhere 5x (+++) the cost of the shaft correct?

Most Jap branded twin plate clutches come with a "lightened flywheel", and will set you back approx $1500.

You can get a super-dooper carbon clutch and super-dooper lightweight unobtainium flywheel for upwards for $10,000 though.

Most Jap branded twin plate clutches come with a "lightened flywheel", and will set you back approx $1500.

You can get a super-dooper carbon clutch and super-dooper lightweight unobtainium flywheel for upwards for $10,000 though.

yeah i've got an OS unit now i'm sure its good, cost a fair bit

but yes the $10000 was more to what i ment in the previous post.

Edited by Angus Smart

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • True, might get it looked at. Found out you can in fact flatten the 12v battery relatively easily too the other day (kids lefts the hazards on) so meaning to get that checked in the new year. What's odd is it'll blow cold from both vents if you have the ac down as low as poss (18), but anything else the passenger one blows warmish. Also has been summer since I got it obvs but noticed it didn't seem to want to blow hot last night when we had a cold snap. 
    • You ask for things. You specifically state you want responsiveness. A link was provided for a far superior, more responsive option. Find a MX5 workshop that will install it for you. Maybe MX5 Mania will throw on the Fab9 kit. It seems they want to charge almost 14K installed for their kit, so if they charge you $6K to install the FAB9 kit then you'll be ahead? Though really, the 2.5 with a 2860 running low boost will more or less feel as good as anything else. It's a lot of displacement and a small turbo. Think of a more modern RB26 with one stock turbo :p TBH, truth be told I've been driving my own car, and use about 50% throttle at most for 99.9% of the time. Mr Bogan is likely similar so this is all going to be semantics for the use case he actually has. (He'll be happy with anything relative to now) However, the EFR is hands down far superior in this use case. You really, really, really, really do notice it over the Garrett or equivalent.  
    • You are correct, the earlier the torque, the earlier things snap
    • Gents, it will be getting the MX5 Mania kit and the 2.5 will be staying where it is My query was about the 0.64 or the 0.86, whilst the 0.64 might spool a bit faster, would the 0.86 be better IRT EGT and mechanical sympathy, with only a small difference in spool And as I assume I won't need alot of boost to get to 200kw, probably around 10 psi, and with max rpm at 6500, would high EGT even really be a issue with a 0.64 I'm heading into MX5 Mania at the end of Jan to discuss the install, so any info is welcome prior to that Basically have a chat and book a time so they can throw on the turbo kit, and fit a oil cooler with a thermostat, drive in drive out of course  In other news: just finished cleaning the car inside and out, it's now all ready to get covered in bugs and dirt driving to Goulburn tomorrow to lunch,  and go for a stroll along woolondilly River with the daughter and her boy, and of course, visit my grandcats and my new grandpuppy 
    • Sounds like it has an actual problem with mode select doors, or something.
×
×
  • Create New...