Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So a stock looking and sounding GT-R with 400 + kw's at the treds....

must be a lie only people in nsw could pull this off.... or maybe its on autosalon's dyno ?

Did someone say that top gear should road test this standard gt-r ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652784
Share on other sites

Assuming this is legit, this must be up there with Giants BNR32 results. "N1's" (Undoubtedly modified) with greater then stock response, 400rwkw and 10s quarters?

Makes ppl that fit singles, wanting less then 400kw's look like monkeys haahahah.

...Still in shock with a whiff of denial, I am.

Edited by GeeTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652796
Share on other sites

There are enough subtle things going on in the engine bay to know this is genuine. Go to Vic race tracks to see some of the RPM built GTRs doing there thing and you will be amazed by how quiet the cars are. A result of the in house exhaust development. You see how quick they are and thats a result of the chassis, engine, braking, cooling development that RPM have done on the GTR.

I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

Personally it sux to see the GTRs going so quick becuase i have to admit to myself that deep down i want one :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652829
Share on other sites

I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

:) 100% :D

I've personally only realised more recently, the insane levels of expense required by shops (So, not just experimenting on various customers "no budget" project car)

The cash equates into nothing more then knowledge to put into another customers car.

People often whinge when shops lock ECU's or don't divulge certain details of setup. "Its my car dammit" they say. Often certain tricks can make or break a setup; differentiate it from the pack. Big shops aren't around to fluff you, they run a business.

What ever they are doing, should be kept tight to their chest.

Respect

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652848
Share on other sites

Just put the figures into the dyno comparison tool http://sau.garagespank.com/login.php it's very impressive to say the least.. My car was running race fuel octane with plenty of timing and it still doesnt have anywhere near the down low power...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653299
Share on other sites

The way the dyno operator loads the car up also makes a huge difference to the look of the curve.

I've came to the conclusion that its near impossible to compare a curve in a true sense.

Mine for example during tuning was seeing 225rwkw at 4000rpm with 1bar; a usual shootout mode power run where you'd nail the throttle at 2000rpm and by 4000rpm we would only see 190rwkw.

But none the less this gtr does have it. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653309
Share on other sites

Check out this engine for area under the curve.

Goes like no other RB we have ever seen!

Sounds like a dream??? photoshop??

I can assure you it is for real!

Hopefully there is more to come so stay tuned...

MORE PIC'S Dammit!!!!!!!!!

Top results!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653385
Share on other sites

Well done Ben...top stuff. Very similar to our 20psi BP98 run at Autosalon Newcastle. You have better down low (i suspect my GT-RS turbo's might be a little laggier than what you have fitted), mines a bit harder midrange but with the same top-end. Good comparo as yours is not finally tuned, ours was ran-in the day before and still with a very safe tune. If someone would like to re-plot our graph over Bens so its easier to look at feel free.

GO THE LOW-MOUNTS!!

post-23582-1203298122_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653461
Share on other sites

Its a 2.9ltr Joel (same as thread title, RB29) :D

That it is buddy. :P

Mark99 used a destroked rb30 crank with rods and custom pistons in an rb26 block to obtain 2.9ltrs. Very similar result.

Curious if this is how they are also doing it.

150rwkw off the bat at 2600rpm is impressive. Its pretty much the same as my stock rb20det turbo'd rb30det was making without loading the car up prior to starting the power run. With the GT30 with 1bar it doesn't make 150rwkw until 3000rpm if you don't load it up prior. hence my comment of how a car is loaded up makes a huge difference to the look of area under the curve. IMO. :whistling:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653494
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Porous blocks are a known issue on something like a Porsche M96, it's not really something I've ever heard of on an RB26. It's possible what people thought was a "porous block" was really a cracked block that they just didn't spot the crack on.
    • This is a controversial subject really, the whole power vs fun thing I mean And this is the main reason I got back into a MX5 Of the last few notable daily cars I've owned whilst I have frequented SAU R33 GTS-t: fun, but because I'm a idiot I modified well past a reliable fun car and ended up hating it, although that was my fault because I tried to have a daily cruiser and race car all in one, the family called it the sometimes car, because sometimes it was working, sometimes it was broken, gladly sold it NB MX5: brilliant car, thrashed the Bejebus out of it, but, again, was stupid and deleted the air con, power steering and stripped the interior out, whilst still fun, and reliable, and super cheap on consumables, it was not a fun place to be going on long cruises, I did love it, but basically every family member hated going anywhere in it, sadly sold it 2015 WRX STI: soulless thing that looked like your average Kia sedan and had that horrible boxer engine with glass ringlands, the family did like it though, that thing was one of my stupidest purchases and I still regret it 2017 Toyota 86: 😪 if I didn't crash it, I would probably still have it, it was a fun little thing, even with that horrible boxer engine, the family did like it, the only reason I didn't get another 86, or, BRZ was the boxer engine, I should have learnt after owning the STI, but I'm a idiot VX SS: great cruiser, fits the whole family, and was fast as.....in a straight line, but a big fat thing, so no enjoyment throwing it around corners, the family was unimpressed with the whole boganness of if, but they did admit it was a comfy place to sit on long cruises As for the NC, I feel it is perfect for what I want, or need out of of a car, whether I'm cruising the Hwy, back roads, twisties or peak hour traffic, the Mrs doesn't mind driving it either, or cruising in it as well, although she does bump her head of the roof nearly every time she gets in, which is farking hilarious, and the kids love taking it for a thrash as well So basically, I've had constantly more fun, and way less headache and heartache, both on the track and on the street, in low powered cars,  go figure.....LOL One thing though, the Mrs has stated that the cams have made the exhaust sound much louder, which they have, but it doesn't bother me, in fact, I actually like it, but, to negate any future comments from the Minister for War and Finances I may look at some changes to the rear muffler set-up to drop the volume down a tad to appease her when we are out and about in it
    • You will need to extend the turbo inlet pipe somehow, which could/might be done with silicone/rubber pipe, but might need steelwork, depending on your intake. And you will need to change the pipework on the outlet in teh same way, but this is more likely to need steelwork.
    • I see... Any idea how much fab work is required? I note the Hygear megathread but its like 900 pages
    • I should try the experiment you're talking about, the throttle switch is still there carried over from the R32 and it's still all wired up but after I did the whole intake manifold refurb and had to recalibrate the TPS I managed to somehow get the idle switch reporting activation at 0.22V, then when I adjusted it to 0.45V for idle it decided the engine was permanently no longer idling which caused some very weird behavior, closed loop idle was disabled so it would basically be at the whims of the cold start valve and whatever the base timing table was at. Then just unplugging/replugging the TPS with the ECU live caused it to relearn the idle TPS position and decide 0.45V was idle. Presumably there's nothing in the TPS that allows for the throttle switch to "recalibrate" like that, not easily at least.
×
×
  • Create New...