Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just put the figures in the dyno tool paul was quite interesting maybe gtrs aren't to bad comes on about the same as my setup but with heaps more in the midrange.... As Cubes said earlier its hard to compare dyno graph but there you go.....

Screenshot??

quite easy to compare dyno graphs if the dyno's are operated correctly. Between Croydon's Dyno Dynamics and Autosalon's Mainline we usually only see a couple of KW's difference, but thats a topic for another thread.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653613
Share on other sites

Agreed Cubes but to make another 50kw that low down where its not making much boost regardless of how it was loaded is quite impressive..

Hey Guys,

I thought this post would stir some interest.

Now, the 450@wheels top end is okay, but check the torque curve and compare it to other rb's.

It makes like twice a normal rb between 2-4500!

This is the area most gtr owners complain about.

It is bizarre to drive, kinda like a quiet 6 litre n/a v12 that makes 600whp and revs to 9k....

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

cheers,

Ben

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653621
Share on other sites

Surely lowly RB20 owners would not be able to afford welding and therefore resort to race taping the 2 blocks together.

That's just stupid man, everyone knows you need to use zip ties to put 2 RB20's together. Noob.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653773
Share on other sites

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

Yep - I don't know what you did to mine but in the quick drive I had last week it sure has changed down low. I honestly thought at first you had changed turbo's on me. So I don't know if you have started tinkering with your ideas on a 2.6 already?

Still - it's nothing compared to yours now I'm sure. It sure looks impressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653815
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

I thought this post would stir some interest.

Now, the 450@wheels top end is okay, but check the torque curve and compare it to other rb's.

It makes like twice a normal rb between 2-4500!

This is the area most gtr owners complain about.

It is bizarre to drive, kinda like a quiet 6 litre n/a v12 that makes 600whp and revs to 9k....

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

cheers,

Ben

Its truely mental...and i thought our torque curve was fat and flat. Its the ultimate circuit/street engine set-up. The linear power delivery would ensure a well balanced car coming onto the power through the twisties. Again Ben...job well done mate.

Tomm0...run in tune with BP98 as stated.

OFENSV, was done in 3rd to stop turbo shuffle, actually made another 10KW the night before at CRD in 4th gear. Jim just knows how to ramp it properly in 4th to stop it, old mate at Autosalon is not as experienced as Jim...hence 3rd gear.

now back to chatting about this bloody torque monster.

EDIT: Ben, any chance of getting a torque printout in a better scale...say 5000-15000N (motive force) or a 100-1300NM (torque).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3654087
Share on other sites

QUOTE(RPMGTR @ 18 Feb 2008, 01:22 PM) *

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

:D

Hrm... i dunno wether to be excited or extremely worried about that :banana:

EXACTLY.....i just got mine back and i thought it was finished....clearly not :)

happy to donate it for 'testing'

hahahahahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3654379
Share on other sites

Man, insane results - well done :teehee: There was a guy in NZ running I think low 11s (at least) with his R32 with what was rumoured to be an RB25 (or 26?) running an RD28 crank and rods and some aftermarket pistons resulting in a 2.9l. Not sure how much there is to that rumour, I've hunted around trying to find information on the parts to see if it can be or has been done and documented but to no avail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3655742
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies in advance if this feels like a topic covered multiple times. I'm only asking because some of the old topics I found are missing images now. I'm in the process of getting a manual boost controller (BC). Nothing fancy, just getting a manual one for now as I don't plan to go crazy with it and would not go over 10 PSI. My car is not jacked up on boost steroids to do crazy numbers. I want to understand the OEM setup of the boost solenoid and vacuum lines on the R34 GTT so I know what needs to be changed when I do install the BC. I sketched the current setup to the best I could see and it's on the diagram attached. If the boost controller 'Wastegate Arrow' goes from nipple 1 to 2. My understanding is that the red vacuum line's "F" connector-end should be connected to BC nipple #2? Nipple #1 is meant to have the "pressure source" so what vacuum line would that be? Is it the green vacuum line?  From what I have read here, the OEM boost solenoid is not used at this point. So that can come out and then I can just plug the nipple that usually connects to the blue vacuum line?  So would the final setup look something like this?   Thanks in advance. I don't want to already be knee-deep into pulling out vacuum lines before understanding this. I'm a noob when it comes to boost setups so trying to learn as I go.
    • Initial/early bite is a feature of.....generic pads. Things that work cold. Just put Bendix Ultimate in it. If you don't like them, it's only $3.50 wasted and an hour to change them. I've been using Intima SR, and they seem to be a good performance pad. Street friendly and able to take at least a little beating.
    • This is my first post after registering.. I hope i can find useful resources on this forum. Great forum. 
    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
×
×
  • Create New...