Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gradenko, did you just damage the little feet that go over the pintle? cos if you did it would probably be ok to just trim them up and put them back in.

I cant see how they could possible do anything but protect the pintle when being inserted into the rail or manifold ( the feet that is). When I put in my sard ones they had no plastic pintle bits at all, just o-rings.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by B-Man

What affect does broken pintle caps have on the injection system, pattern and flow ? ??

Yeah, its the bit that claws around the bottom of the injecter. A malformed pintle cap may not seal the lower o-ring to the fuel rail and that would let fuel leak into the inlet tract. Doesn't affect flow or spray pattern at all.

Steve, i think your right about the claws, they don't have much of a part to play in sealing the o-ring. A bit late for me to put the old caps back in. Their all gone now :). I didn't like how brittle the old pintle caps were, they could have come apart in the inlet tract at anytime and caused the injectors to leak, so I asked the guy to replace them all.

I had a few broken claws before I removed the injectors. I think combustion temperatures would have made short work of any rogue plastic bits. I remember reading a column in Wheels where the author told us about the time a mouse ran up his workshop mechanics leg, up his back, over his shoulder, down his arm, down a screwdriver and into the open carby he was working on. The engine gave a quick miss and splutter and returned to a solid idle like nothing had happened ;).

Steve, if the Sard injectors didn't come with caps, that could be the reason Inasant and yourself were having trouble with them leaking. Was there an indent after the lower o-ring for a pintle cap to sit on?

No indent. The pintle acutally protruded further than the stock one does. the leaking problem was definately the fault of the undersized o-ring provided. The injectors themselves sat quite firmly in the rail, and had to be pulled down with the injector cap screws.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...