Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh, one other thing about my turbo - the "bodgy" bit about the install wasn't the turbo itself, but rather the weak spring used to pull back the sticky wastegate pivot, as well as the welded-up and cut pivot. Once this is fixed I won't need the extra external spring and it won't look bodgy anymore :( It is a standard T04E turbo.

Actually Jay, you're the first person to ask :( This is probably because before today, I didn't even know what my turbo was. The engineer guy at Garrett instantly identified it as a T04E without even noting anything unusual about it, so I'd say it's the full standard unit and not a T3/4 hybrid. The previous owner advertised it as a "450hp T04" but I forgot to ask any more details about it before buying the car.

I've always liked this turbo, but there's nothing else I can compare it to really (aside from some poxy TX3 turbos I've driven from waaaay back). Benm's car with the factory turbo was slightly faster than mine when I got it, but he had a better intercooler and air filter. Since I upgraded my cooler and plenum I'd say they are at least on par again, and now I can also run higher boost due to the steel wheels.

My turbo seems to start spooling fairly low (maybe 2000rpm?) but it doesn't seem to hit maximum boost until 4500rpm or so. I always thought this was an anomoly of the turbo, but now I've found that the wastegate wasn't working properly it could just be that.

I'll re-evaluate it again once the wastegate is fixed. Maybe it is a lag monster relatively speaking, but it doesn't seem to bother me. I can still pull up a hill in 5th gear with a carful of passengers, so it must be doing something at lowish revs.

Hehe...cool. It doesn't seem like a lag monster if it's making boost around 2000rpm...that's actually very responsive. I used to have a GT3037S on a 2L and that was laggy, like no boost until around 3500rpm!! Too laggy for street use, but when it came on boost it was great ;) I think I'll try the GT2835PRO S for my next 2L.

Well that's the thing - it always felt like it was making boost early, but with my foot to the floor, it never got to full boost until around 4500rpm (maybe 5000). Going from what other people have posted here it should have been 500-1000rpm earlier than that to be considered an "early boost" type turbo.

I won't mind if it's around the same after it comes back, it was a gradual transition to max boost rather than a punch in the kidneys.

Fixing the wastegate should at least reduce the strain on my poor EBC, which has been fighting against this sticky pivot for well over a year now. If it brings full boost on earlier then that's a bonus.

Well you can definitely feel it kick in, a lot more than getting to the sweet spot on a lumpy cam on a NA engine (as I get on my bike). It's just not as harsh as some cars I've been in, which makes cornering a little more predictable.

I dunno, "feeling" of turbos kicking in is very subjective. One person might think the turbo kick is excessive, when another will think that the car doesn't even have a turbo. If we are ever at the same cruise I'll take you for a spin and you decide :D

Yeah, it is subjective I guess. I've heard that some RWD cars running large turbos tend to wheel spin when the turbo kicks in. Can get very dangerous in the wet, but if this happens, you know that it's a pretty big thump! :D

Never been in a car that does this, because my car is AWD and traction is rarely a problem. Though my sister has a stock s15 and it feels a lot more dangerous in the wet, even when my car had 206kW at all four wheels. It's really easy to get the rear end outwards when turning a corner (s15). And I can imagine it would be very difficult to control with 200+KW at the rear wheels. But I guess 10" width rims would give a little more traction...

I got the turbo back this morning and put it back in the car this afternoon, it was a lot easier than taking it off because I knew where everything went and where to get the spanners in.

Including getting everything like the exhaust sealing compound on it took me around an hour. The whole wastegate was replaced, apparently the old one was pretty stuffed. The new one operates very smoothly and with no freeplay at all.

I noticed that the spacer for the turbo mounting isn't normal because it causes the nuts to not go all the way down on the studs. I tried taking it out but then the turbo touches on the engine, so I put the spacer back in and did the nuts up a bit tighter than they were originally.

I haven't gone for a test drive yet because after all this I took the fuel pump out, but it all starts up and runs ok. I did a big coolant flush and put new coolant in and bled the system. The new fuel pump should be in tomorrow afternoon so I'll see how it goes after that.

Oh, the big thing - the rattling noise is now completely gone! Obviously the dud wastegate was the entire cause of the noise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...