Jump to content
SAU Community

Gtr Vs 911 Turbo Around A Track In Car Magazine


Recommended Posts

Guy I spoke to over here in Perth who is driving the GTR in targa west ,Steve, says it acutally 'feels' every bit as responsive as his smaller lighter evo that he used for last years event did but, actually better in terms of total control. It's like the tardis in reverse handling wise. Big luxo-barge weight / evo like response in handling. Tyre and brake killer I suspect though?

Alot of the reviewers seem to be amazed by the handling not only for it's weight but, just in general.

I mean a Mazda bongo van is very light but, when a strong breeze at 100km/h just about tips it over you wouldn't call that the be all criterior for a great handling car?

Top Gear and the Stig to see if how quick it is. Then Fifth Gear and Tiff as i agree 99 times out of 100 on what he says makes a good car. If he gets out of the heavy automatic beast and says its really fun to drive and doesnt drive like an EVO then i will maybe change my tune on the car. Not that it matters i will never own one :rofl: There is a 89 Carrera 4 dressed up in 72 RS body and colours for sale at the moment. I am itching to buy it :/

Oh they are smoking hot! Got pics?

The GTR is just a Datsun whose styling loses out to a Hyundai Tiburon :(

If you look at it that way, the 911 is just a trumped up 60's Volkswagen Beetle "facelifted" by the world's laziest styling department.

I don't think either car is attractive. On looks alone I prefer the Audi R8, even though its significantly slower than either.

It is my understanding that the rear engined car is generally more tail happy than the yellow beast in the video. It begs the question, Did the powers that be set the car up in the knowledge that journos with varying skill levels would be driving it,

The 996 and 997 have had a lot of the taily nature dialled out of them.

Porsche purists who stopped bleating about the 996 not being air cooled started to bleat that the "safe understeery nature" of the car takes away from one of its defining handling characteristics.

I don't think either car is attractive. On looks alone I prefer the Audi R8, even though its significantly slower than either.

I think that 997 Porsches are one of the best looking cars out there. A very unique and distinctive style that grows on you the more you look at it. The 997 models actually look a lot better in real life than on film or picture. The same can be said about the GTR. When it first appeared, i thought it was ugly. But the more i see it, the better it looks.

The R8 on the other hand is the exact opposite. It started from looking good to looking quite ugly. Somehow, it doesn't look proportional. Even Jeremy Clarkson agrees with me.

And for most other supercars? Well they just look like Ferrari ripoffs.

If you look at it that way, the 911 is just a trumped up 60's Volkswagen Beetle "facelifted" by the world's laziest styling department.

I don't think either car is attractive. On looks alone I prefer the Audi R8, even though its significantly slower than either.

Point is, to me the 997 is a great looking car. Even considering the car's history, the beetle never was/isnt...911s are good things to look at.

Agree re the R8...cant wait for the R10 :thumbsup:

There is a 89 Carrera 4 dressed up in 72 RS body and colours for sale at the moment. I am itching to buy it :thumbsup:

Owned one briefly (edit oops: a 964 Carrera 4) Roy.... just a Great car mate :happy:

Do it!

Edited by Marlin
If the badges were swapped, then i guess you and Roy will prefer the GTR?

One of my favourite cars is the Vf/VG Valiant Coupe.

IMGP0313.JPG

Do you think i care about badges and labels? I own a GTSt that is worth more then many GTRs. I also happen to love, i mean LOVE Mk 1 Escorts, BDA/LOTUS Escorts etc so dont think i care about badges. Nissan/Datsun build great cars...i just fear with the R35 they havent built a great drives car?!?!?!?>!?

FORD%20ESCORT%20MK1%20MEXICO%20ML1580%208X15.JPG

i just fear with the R35 they havent built a great drives car?!?!?!?>!?/quote]

Possibly. Guess you'll have to wait for the V-spec to come out then. The 911 turbo aint 'raw'. It is quite refined. The 911 GT2 or GT3 RS is what i would define as 'RAW'

Also any Porsche before the 996/997 era are IMO, are tail happy pieces of crap. I would never buy one even if it's super cheap. Cos the parts are super expensive!!

It will be interesting to see how the guys racing the R35 go with parts and reliability. Fancy gearbox, clutches, electrics etc...in a few eyars it will be all the norm....but in the meantime hats off to the Aus folk who are talking on racing them. My biggest concern is clutches and gearbowes and diffs etc, temperature and failures in racing. Im sure Nissan have done their homework

.i just fear with the R35 they havent built a great drives car?!?!?!?>!?

There is therapy and medication for you irrational fears Roy :(

The people who have driven the R35 seem to have a hard time wiping the smile off thier faces, good sign we don't need to be afraid.

How cool would it be to drive something as heavy as an old dodge charger lapping the ring as fast as this thing? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...