Fpr For Big Fuel Return Pipe?!?

[GeeTR]

^^^

Gawd that thread still makes me blush reading it. Strong words!

carry on

[DCIEVE]

GeeTR, can double flare but to be honest its a pain in the arse, just did mine and trying to fit the flaring tool on the line while hanging under the car is a pain, not to mention the std lines have a coating so the flaring tool slips of far too easily. If I did it again I would rip the line out and replace it with ally line bent to replicate the original line (still plan to do this anyway).

greeces13, brads stagea runs a 1/2" feed line to the engine and a 3/8 return, feed splits into twin -6, return from rail to reg is -6 also. Im not a fan of the sard reg though, I would go aeromotive or magnafuel to your budget.

[GreeceS13]

Endly noone reply me if a fpr with 6AN holes will be good for me...

And maybe I will go for two 044 or one 044 and one walbro external.

[GeeTR]

Endly noone reply me if a fpr with 6AN holes will be good for me...

And maybe I will go for two 044 or one 044 and one walbro external.

Well I'm unfortunately not someone, but my hot tip is this... that if your not hearing the the repeated (from multiple sources) answer you want, then chances are, ppl's results vary, which does occur, life isn't plugNplay.

If your tuner is careful (as he should be) a restriction in the return will show its head in a pretty linear and obvious fashion i would think (rail pressure rising over base+boost pressure)

Hence....

Considering in other of your threads, ppl mentioned that the stock lines would support 600rwhp, -8 return would be fine. In the total cost of things, playing around with returns is fairly trivial, and can modified later on, if proven to be insufficient. Swot i would do.

So give it a go, and let us know

Edited March 17, 2008 by GeeTR