Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a V8 wouldnt bad at all...high tech high revving engine, but id like it to stay a six. As long as the new GTR exceeds its predesors (spelling) then we all should be happy.

But if there was a V8 option, and it was sold here...wouldnt it be sweet to own bathurst again..?

From the specs, it looks like the engine is going to be gruntier in the mid section, and rev a bit less, but be totally barnstorming overall !!

think about this for a second, a Road version of a JGt car !!

those things are limited to about 500ps in the championship

:O

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Th whole story behind the Direct Injection is that the VQ32DETT has to meet the Euro4/5 emissions laws in 2005. The absolute tech involved in this engine is unsurpassed by any other.

The motors connected to the turbo housings have a valve along side to regulate the exhaust gas coming out of the engine, so that the engine management can spool-up the turbo with only a fraction of the gas-flow that is required with traditional "passive" turbos!

So what we have is an "active" turbo!

Can you imagine... Nismo bringing out an extra "piggy-back" device to spool-up the turbos at idle?

Also,

The new Attessa 4WD system has a active diff that regulates the drive to front and rear wheels according to throttle position...

...and an new dry sump thats a virtual copy of the JGTC car...

Originally posted by Rezz

But some people think a ****ing ute is a sportscar... what with the low suspension and the "touring" wings and crap...go figure. But I am NEVER gonna accept that a ute is a sportscar.  

WHAT !

I've been waiting to show this little baby off

Download it (2.4meg)

Its a R32 GT-R Converted into a Ute and Drifting away on the track :]

Download Here: http://www.users.on.net/johnhill/R32GT-R_u...te_drifting.asx

Happy Viewing ;p

:burnout:

WHAT!!!!! 480 HP!!!!! if it's in the production, it can't be produced in Japan for sure because of gentlemen's agreement.

BTW.....waitin' for pix. Is it the same pix as I saw in a magazine?!?!?! it's a computer-generated pix that use V35 coupe as base...........

what would be the rev limiter? the peak power is at 7200rpm ,wouldn't this mean it could rev a lil more, say till 8500rpm, maybe even 9000rpm? cuz the GT-R's now have peak at 6800rpm(?) , and rev till 8500rpm(?) ..... figures just the top of my head btw, correct me if i'm wrong

OK.

It's definately a Skyline. I don't know what a V35 is, here the 2-door Skyline is called the 350GT. And the GT-R is most definately using it's bodyshell (of course).

Don't worry, the 4 round tail lights are there! Do you really think after 30-odd years they're just gonna THROW AWAY the 'ol stove tops?

The famous Japanese 280ps limit? Well, for quite a few years now, the top-line sportscars from Japan have been sold "claiming to have" 280ps, but in reality, it's well over this (R34 GT-R for example). Remember, it's just an unwritten agreement, and manufacturers aswell as governing bodies etc are more than willing to turn a blind eye to the new GT-R's output, if it means it'll knock the Porsche 911 Turbo off it's pedestal...

...thats my interpretation. But when I asked my friend Kazuya (he works at Honda) about it, he said "Nobody cares about the 280ps"... so it's a gentlemans agreement, if you adhere to it, good on you, old boy.

But just watch all the new top-line sports cars from other makers come out with well over 300ps in '04 and '05.

Originally posted by Rezz

OK.

It's definately a Skyline. I don't know what a V35 is, here the 2-door Skyline is called the 350GT. And the GT-R is most definately using it's bodyshell (of course).

Don't worry, the 4 round tail lights are there! Do you really think after 30-odd years they're just gonna THROW AWAY the 'ol stove tops?

The famous Japanese 280ps limit? Well, for quite a few years now, the top-line sportscars from Japan have been sold "claiming to have" 280ps, but in reality, it's well over this (R34 GT-R for example). Remember, it's just an unwritten agreement, and manufacturers aswell as governing bodies etc are more than willing to turn a blind eye to the new GT-R's output, if it means it'll knock the Porsche 911 Turbo off it's pedestal...

...thats my interpretation. But when I asked my friend Kazuya (he works at Honda) about it, he said "Nobody cares about the 280ps"... so it's a gentlemans agreement, if you adhere to it, good on you, old boy.

But just watch all the new top-line sports cars from other makers come out with well over 300ps in '04 and '05.

Subaru and Mitsubishi have already broken this agreement, the wrx sti spec c is actually marketed as having 220+kw and the EVO likewise. The "gentlemens agreement" does not exist anymore.

It's interesting to read this topic. Has anyone seen the wheels magazine with the red RX-8 Mazda on the front? New GT-R pic is in there. Except it's not from MagazineX like they claim. It's from Nissan Design. One of the guys there is a heavy-hitter in Jap auto industry.

Speed magazine has a big article on the R35 Nissan GT-R, and yes Australia IS getting the car, not sure whether it will be in American spec (5.4L 305kW 540Nm NA V8 with optional Auto) or Jap/Euro spec (VQ35DETT of claimed 206kW, more likely 220-260kW).

And Speed also has a scoop on the wildest & fastest production car to come out of Japan EVER. It's not a Nissan, Toyota or Suzuki. You'll have to buy issue 8 of Speed to find out...:uh-huh:

Originally posted by Sonic

not sure whether it will be in American spec (5.4L 305kW 540Nm NA V8 with optional Auto) or Jap/Euro spec (VQ35DETT of claimed 206kW, more likely 220-260kW).

Why has there NEVER been a mention of a V8 in a Skyline of any sort, let alone the GT-R, in Japan, in the lead up to this Octobers Tokyo Motor Show, when they'll be releasing the final prototype of the GT-R?

Engineering a V6 chassis to accept a V8 solely for a niche sector of a single market? Re-engineering the suspension, body rigidity etc for a heavier V8 aswell as the V6? They'll have to call the V8 another name then, won't they? They'll behave like two different cars...

I'm not saying Nissan have never considered a V8 for use in a GT-R, I just know that that theory has been put to rest, and the new GT-R IS a VQ Thirty-Two DETT... based on the JGTC VQ30DETT, that meets Euro 4/5 emmisions laws.

Whatever. Remember, America buys more cars than anyone else and it's the world's largest car-buying market. And Japan isn't getting the bent-eight or auto option. It's going to be a world car and Carlos Goshn has said it will be Nissan's "Halo vehicle".

Are you sure an NA V8 will weigh more than a TT V6? Turbos can weigh quite a bit. If you don't belive me, that's ok. We will see IF the car's released in October.

Their releasing the final "prototype" at the show, it's not the official launch... as far as I know, they haven't decided that yet.

Oh, and I do believe you that the US is the largest market.

The car will be displayed as the final, production-ready car. That was announced by Nissan International in May. Remember that this is Nissan's primo vehicle, to be sold in every western market there is. Goshn said it will be in every country Mitsu sells Evos and Subi sells STis. Out here, Leon Daphne wants the car bad, but it's unclear whether we will get the Yank V8 or Jap/Euro V6.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...