Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

um lol u seriously wanna compare a GTR to a GTS... well.. hmm

there's no comparison.... if you can afford it get a GTR, if you can't GTS. If you want sumfin that's drivable every day and won't scare the pants off ya, then get a GTSt. GTS is too boring... mines a daily driven and is basically my run around car. Can't wait to get my weekend car next yr :O

It depends on your wallet size... 40k should see you in a GTR, 19k should see you in a GTSt, 15k should see you in a GTS. What's can you afford?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435054
Share on other sites

JAGR33 is close to the Mark as usual I sold my old 97 for $48500 about a year ago had done 50,000kms only small modes such as Power FC, pods, injectors etc. Damm I miss that car. V Specs go for slightly more.... Find me a 97 for 35G and I will buy two!! Mine had 250kw at all fours wiht budget mods so easy to get more power from.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435449
Share on other sites

Guest 180sx_nissan_guru

JAGR33, it aint that hard. shit i drove past a car yard the other day and they had a white R33 GTR sitting in under all the commodores. you just gotta look around. look in dealerships AND look localy, like around the streets, it aint that hard.

or if your really desperate just go and import one, should save you a few.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435472
Share on other sites

My GTR is a 97 and 2 years ago it cost well over 50k. The car was in very good/excellent condition.

Nowadays, you'd still be looking at around the 50k mark for a good condtion 97 model.

95 models are around the low-mid 40k mark. I infact know a 95 model in excellent condition being sold for 43k if anyone is interested.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435792
Share on other sites

Originally posted by 180sx_nissan_guru

JAGR33, it aint that hard.

dont argue with jack... he's BIG and scary lol!

but there is NO was you'll get one for 35 G's.

dont bother arguing with the guys that have replied here, cause they all own(ed) one.

QUOTE OF THE DAY:

tell him he's dreamin    

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435818
Share on other sites

well see the thing is i was just wondering if cops will be looking out for high performance cars and well i have two options get a GTR straight out or get a GTSt and then trade in the GTSt and get a GTR when i 'm off my P's

What dya recon would i get busted?

Or would you say as long as i'm not speeding or the cops don't have a reason to pull me over i'd be fine?

Or i'm i sure to get busted?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-435893
Share on other sites

Good R33's over here in Perth are still around the $50k mark unless you want a smash repair job. Series II's will be around the $55 - $60k mark for a good one.... Mine's a 95 and cost me $49k last year.

Oh and 260 - 280kw at the fly is waaaayy over the mark for a stock GTR. Maybe 220 - 240... Though very easy to get that with minimal mods....

I've owned a GTST and the GTR and they don't compare. A GTST is a good car and is better than anything aussie, but a GTR is in another stratosphere. Apples and Oranges if you try and compare the two....

my 2c

Brett

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20730-gtr-specs/#findComment-436117
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...