Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK I've almost finished my oral presentation on the new p-plater laws. My final question to all you guys and girls is that;

if events: drag, drift, track days/nights were subsidized by the Government and were made cheaper I mean alot cheaper ($10 entry at calder and $50-100 trackdays for example) would you refrain from 'hoon' like behaviour on the roads?

I understand how much more busy places like calder will be but try to keep this out of your decision.

Cheers ROb

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/207459-ethicalsocial-question/
Share on other sites

i think you would get more people to the events, definitely

but i dont think that will clear it up on the streets

what happens on the streets varies from the way people just drive on a day to day basis to someone pulling up next to you at the lights and wanting to be a knob - it'll happen anyway

i learnt a lot from the driver training days - especially in the wet

and after a full day of speeding around sandown, i had enough of the fast life and twas good to just cruise around :)

doing training/track days once a month i reckon really does help ease the need for speed - so yes, if it was subsidised i reckon it will help calm the hoonage

you'll clear it up to an extent.

But as always, there will still be illegal meets and what not, it will just be at a much reduced level.

This is based on facilities not only being cheap, but also semi-close by and open regularly (more than once a week)

It will help to a certain extent but it will get the wrong crowd I think. Similar to when they have a gun amnesty, its always the people who have no intention of using the gun that hand it in.

With cheaper events, you will attract a very high population of people who would have no intention of doing races on the streets and actually get more people interested in this type of event who otherwise wouldnt be bothered (e.g Joe Bloggs in his barina).

Having cheaper and more accessible events is the long term whinge of speeders/street racers but in reality it would deter very few as the buzz/danger/excitement/impulse isnt there.

Yeh i think it would help too, definately would not stop hoon totally behaviour but personally i feel it would curb it somewhat. Mnay people with high powered cars and imports have never seen the strip or a track and therefore the only times they have been able to 'use' their car and get what they payed for in terms of performance is illegally on the street.

I think making it cheaper will be great for those who are genuinely into motorsports or drag racing as a legitimate hobby, BUT i don't think it will stop hoon activity on the street as there will always be people who love drag racing on the street and have no interest in doing it 'officially' at the strip or the circuit.

  GTTR34 said:
I think making it cheaper will be great for those who are genuinely into motorsports or drag racing as a legitimate hobby, BUT i don't think it will stop hoon activity on the street as there will always be people who love drag racing on the street and have no interest in doing it 'officially' at the strip or the circuit.

word. some people don't care about tracks and strips..

Agreed it cannot stop hoon activity entirely but import drivers and the like would have less of a reason to feel the need to put the foot down and drag if they knew it could be done it a perfectly legal way easily and cheaply and therefore the risks associated with doin it illegally are made even more not worth it. I know thats what i would do / think.

ok thanks people,

1. so what do you suggest that is realistic in the aim of stopping as much as possible 'hoon' behaviour?

2. Do u think that the only way of stoping stuff like it will be to have the cars removed from the driver?

3. How effective do you think the new tac ad on TV is? will this help?

I know that these questions dont really nead answering but I cant walk into a presentation with no research, if u know what I mean.

Thanks for all of the responses so far :D

1) I think its more about driver education. Alot of mistakes happen that cause accidents, it isnt always in relation to hoon behaviour. Plus, if some of the young drivers are in a car in a controlled environment that "looses control" maybe itll scare them enough that they dont try anything stupid on the roads.

2) I dont think car removal is the only answer. You can be a hoon in a Skyline, a 200SX or your parents Comoddore. You could even been a hoon in a toyota camery. Dragging off the lights, spinning up the wheels, or driving dangerously is the driver and not the car. Taking the car away may be preventative, but they can always jump in a family members car. It will help, but I think there must be a better way.

3) New TAC add I dont think is that effective. I just looked at it and it didnt make me think for a second I should change my driving (not to say I would classify as a hoon, but I would be lying if I said that I haven't gone over the speed limit before).

  r_o_b said:
OK I've almost finished my oral presentation on the new p-plater laws. My final question to all you guys and girls is that;

if events: drag, drift, track days/nights were subsidized by the Government and were made cheaper I mean alot cheaper ($10 entry at calder and $50-100 trackdays for example) would you refrain from 'hoon' like behaviour on the roads?

I understand how much more busy places like calder will be but try to keep this out of your decision.

Cheers ROb

No, it wont solve the problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...