Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This creeping boost saga is a mind-bender, and I don’t know that there is a clear cut answer. The tendency to rise and fall regardless of whether running straight off the actuator or EBC gives a few clues, and yeah it is clearly a balancing act to get everything working together properly with this 0.63 A/R spec IW housing. Possibly a large diameter wastegate actuator can is part of the solution, as suggested? Given the actuator will have a limited range of travel, is there any evidence of flex/bend in the actuator mounting bracket? That might be a telltale of backpressure trying to force it further open.

Observed boost levels are falling back to the targeted level as rpm (and mass-flow of gases) rise. That could be due to skyrocketing turbine inlet pressure; or alternatively massive venting through the wastegate causing turbine speed to fall away.

If the backpressure rose out of proportion to boost pressure, then measured boost will drop because backpressure works against the boosted inlet charge. Monitoring turbine inlet pressure would tell virtually all you would need from a turbine efficiency / flow / wastegate capacity perspective. The HKS Pro S housing actually has a threaded hole right below the turbine inlet flange - just the ticket for screwing in a pressure fitting.

Tracking turbine speeds is achieveable with the kit now offered by Garrett, but IMO it’s a bit of overkill for a one-off use unless there are the $$ available. Still, it is great that the gear is available to data acquisition nutters at reasonable prices.

Getting to a solution without spending big $$ or investing/wasting lots of time, first thing I would do is look for bend/flex in that actuator bracket. Secondly, check for any evidence during dyno running, or your road testing, of knock? (presuming you've got a PFC and Datalogit access). A cluey tuner will have a good idea whether backpressure + scavenging issues are inhibiting the tune and inducing knock.

You could go on searching for the cause/s, but the key is whether it is boosting predictably and not just running away when you really want 100% reliability at the track. Apart from the fact that it is overboosting then dropping back, does it run the way you want it to? One thing is clear: sub 4000rpm the 3071 punches hard and really fills out total area under the curve.

After all that, if/when you have car down-time, the drilling/tapping operation into manifold or housing is quick and relatively easy. Use an NPT fitting and length of coiled bundy tube to dissipate heat, and a temporary pressure gauge will tell all.

Edited by Dale FZ1

At this stage i don't mind working around the midrange hump. It seems to be something i will be stuck with until i go either a larger housing or external gate, neither option i can really afford for now. Boost can be held under 1.4bar now so I'm happy about that atleast, even though it means running less than 1 bar at the bottom end. The gate blowing open is an issue that only a tighter actuator can resolve, the concern then is whether that will push the midrange creep up beyond the 1.3-4bar it sits at now.

It's not falling back to the set pressure, it is generally falling to about 1 bar, whether it's set at that or higher.

Sub 4k it is making a lot more power than the old setup. I did a bodgy overlay last night, as all my dynos are plotted on the same scale so very easy to trace, and 4k is about where the cross over occurs. I'm about 20-25rwkw down for the rest of the run, though on road it doesn't seem to lack anything. The peak AFM reading is also about .25V down on where it used to be. I would like to get atleast 10 more kw up top to make this whole exercise worthwhile.

So who has a supplier for actuators? GCG seem to be a bit limited in that field. And who can give me some advice on a pfc boost control kit and how well it will handle this issue/what sort of tunability is there? I read the faq, it seems to be very basic (you set a target boost, but still have to muck about with a duty to get it to hold it?). Anyone have some thoughts or experience?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

holy thread ressurection :(

rather then starting a new thread, ill stick it here.....

Still trying to decide what to get for an RB25. A real 3071r in .63 or .82 ??? IF anyone has a dyno graph of the .82 that they can post up, that would be awsome ! Seen the .63 earlier in this thread. When can i expect full boost in 2nd gear with .82 ?

Thanks.

Edited by KISIN
have a look in the dyno results thread near the end for skylinecouple's results.

He's also posted in one of the other 3071 threads floating around

Thanks champ, just had a look...still not helping me decide lol. I basicly just want to be 100% sure i can can crack 250rwkw without much problems at all and have room for more (porbably a safe-ish 270)... .63 or .82 ?

Thanks.

don't get a .63 internal gate housing. If you get ex gate .63 with a 44mm gate it will be an animal on an rb25. the .63 will just scrape in 270.

if you want to keep the stock manifold stick with a .82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...