Jump to content
SAU Community

Mines R35 In Fnf4?


lingeringsoul
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why do you guys hate and poo poo the idea just because it's the fnf franchise?

have you ever considered that the film could have matured?

i mean

f**k

you guys complain when there's no gt-r's in the film, and only "riced up hondas"

then you see a picture of brian o'connor standing next to a fkn SICK bayside blue gt-r with his handsome smile and you STILL hate??

"oh no now all the 14 year olds will want one"

wtf is wrong with you guys?

as if when you were 14 you didn't draw pictures of gt-rs doing burnouts on your school files

god

so much hate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

god

so much hate

i am... therefore i hate...

suck it up sunshine, some people just don't like its impact on the image of the car we have come to love.

that said from the looks of this movie, and the snippets of plot being revealed, the skyline rolls with some really nice exotics and muscle cars instead of rice burners for once. its a refreshing change... and yeah i didn't mind that the R34 is relatively stock looking and has no decals which remind me of a 1980's danni minogue outfit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

come on guys, you all love it!

F&F1 - greatest car movie ever, no other other has given us fantastic quotes such as:

"I need NOS - 2 of the big ones!"

"2jz no shit"

"You never had me - you never had your car"

and plenty of other gems, no doubt used on a daily basis by every car enthusiast.

As mensioned above, you're all bagging it now, but youll be lining up on day 1 to see it!!

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was another great F&F installment i guess, filled in alot of the gaps between F&F1 and F&F 2 (2f2f) but also gaps between F&F1 andF&F3 (td).

Some pretty average moments and a few yeah rights or cheesy scene rolls, but otherwise it didnt surprise me to see it follows the f&f style. Its got some oh no you didnt moments too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to see it tonight. I know its going to be tacky and lame but at the end o the day when does hollywood make movies about japanese cars? And of course I'll see some tits thrown in there somehwere! :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
I'm guessing they slap decals all over it b4 filming begins.

And Brian Earl Spilner was only his undercover name.

Brian O'Connor was his name. :)

Bet it gets driven by his girlfriend or the bad guy or something, so its in the movie but an american car can be the hero car.

The R35 is in FnF4 but Brian tears it apart and uses its parts for a blue R34 (personally it should have been the other way around)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...