Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i'm trying to get some quality pics with my Canon S3 IS, but no matter what ISO I use, and what lighting condition, the images always have artefacts or coloured noise in them.

I've got the CHDK firmware mod on it which allows me to run scripts and shoot in RAW mode, so that should cancel the effects of JPG compression artefacts. Regardless of whether or not the hacked firmware is loaded it still gives me similar results.

Here's a blown up look:

post-256-1204528261.jpg

Here's the EXIF data:

post-256-1204528297.gif

Full image resized with some noise reduction:

2306991960_0297e29fda_o.jpg

RAW file (converted to Digital Negative DNG file)... right click and save as:

http://www.superfunhappysliders.com/images/CRW_1502.DNG

Does anyone have any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?

post-256-1204528261_thumb.jpg

post-256-1204528297_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208755-canon-s3-is-with-artifacts-in-image/
Share on other sites

Have you set the compression to fine in the options? About the only thing that I can think off.... Used that very camera for a good while and didn’t have any issues like that... Could also be your pc as it looks like it’s not blending the pixels, when I zoom into my pictures it’s also showing the picture pixelated like that but changes to smooth in about 1 second. My first sugestion would be to try the same pickture on another pc if you haven't yet

Edited by bnr#@

Seems strange, that is definitely a bit too noisy for ISO 75.

*has a look at the DNG*

Alright, I've done a bit of research on you camera. The noise levels you're experiencing are pretty much normal for that sensor. It's small, and noise is a unfortunate result of that.

I believe the S3 IS has noise reduction settings, try them out. A lot of the time though you'll find the noise reduction filters will kill image detail and quality. Software noise reduction options do a pretty good job and might be an option for you in your post processing workflow.

DPReview has some good sample shots from your camera model: http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/Canon_s3IS_samples/

So, you can either live with the noise, fight the noise or buy a new camera. :D

you have taken a photo then tried to crop out a tiny little part of it - maybe 5% of the actual image, and then tried to blow it up big

it is just all pixely

if you printed the original photo at 8x10inch or even 16x20in you wouldnt see that noise

if you just wanted a shot of the grill of the GTR, you should have walked over and taken one, Photoshop cant put detail in that wasnt captured in the original image

you have taken a photo then tried to crop out a tiny little part of it - maybe 5% of the actual image, and then tried to blow it up big

it is just all pixely

if you printed the original photo at 8x10inch or even 16x20in you wouldnt see that noise

if you just wanted a shot of the grill of the GTR, you should have walked over and taken one, Photoshop cant put detail in that wasnt captured in the original image

the blow up was a chunk to show the amount of colour noise that's in the photos. Usually when you blow up a picture there's blurring or antialiasing, but no colour noise like that. the point I'm trying to make is that the colour noise is quite visible with no zoom applied. Of course I'd take a pic of the grille closer up if that's what I wanted a pic of.

Yeah for 75 ISO on a nice bright outdoor setting that's way too much noise... I'm suspicious that the sensors panel's got something wrong with it.

I turned off the internal noise reduction settings to capture a raw image at full quality and then wanted to do the noise reduction by hand to try and retain as much detail... might try turning it on and see if that's any better. I really wanted to do some macro shots, and that much noise can ruin those kind of shots. Night shots are a nightmare also with all that noise.

having never used an S3IS it may be normal for that model

Canon did issue a recall a while ago for a camera with a CCD problem- i cant remember which model it was though i am currently trying to find out though

my Cameras are a Canon 350d and 1dmk2n - both of which are 8mp DSLRs with a fairly large sensor.

i work for a camera repair facility here in perth and am constantly surprised at what some point and shoot cameras produce.

stuff my colleagues call "normal" from some cameras, wouldnt stay on the memory card for more than a minute or so if i took it with my camera.

Pixel size and density affects image noise.

a large sensor of the same Megapixels as a smaller sensor will nearly always produce cleaner images because of the lower pixel density and lower buildup of heat (the actual cause of the noise) CCD sensors are normally also noisier than CMOS sensors (your camera will have a CCD type sensor)

i am currently downloading the DNG file to have a closer look

EDIT - those pics actually look pretty clean.

i have seen much worse photos come out of some of the cameras at work, and some of the photos that a friend of mine did at my wedding are really noisy, even at 100ISO

a little bit of noise ninja or lightroom's noise reduction and they will look a little better.

and the noise reduction bit in the camera still works with RAW files, it does a dark frame subtraction to long exposures - so even with it on it wouldnt have helped this photo

Edited by Echo63

Like I said, that amount of noise seems pretty normal for that camera (even on those settings). If you want less noise you're going to have to get a new camera (something with a larger sensor -- this usually means less noise).

That seems about right for a camera of that range. If you wanted better you'd prob have to upgrade camera and get something with a better/larger sensor.

Also, comparing the original to the crop you've zoomed in quite alot. Thing is though, even if you had no noise in the crop the pic is still extreemly pixelated so getting rid of it would be of little benifit.

  • 2 weeks later...

Thats totally normal for a S3 Shan...

Unfortunatlly thats about the best you can do with a CCD, Cmos is the next step in compact digital still cameras, coming next year...

Already great examples in the current DSLR range of what a Cmos sensor can do...

There is also new CMOS technoligy coming to DSLR, with a sensor that has a "gapless micro lens" over each individual diode...

Currentlly on demonstration as the eyes of the Canon HV20 & HG10 HD Camcorders...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Dumb question, but why would it matter if the wheel came off a car with hicas or not?
    • Hey to anyone that reads this, long time lurker first time posting, sorry if it’s been answered before but I’ve been looking for nearly a year now for answers. ive got a 25det neo in an r32 that works awesome when it works (made 500whp on 21psi) but works 45% of the time, 1st issue there’s a harness that runs under the passengers side front fender that my tire keeps rubbing through and one wire seems to power the fuel pump even though I’ve done the relay “mod” some people like to call it, and when it does rub through it kills the car, yes next time I’m with the car I want to take the fender off and try tuck the harness well out of the way but I’d also like to try and by pass this mysterious wire as well lol, also wouldn’t mind getting power from the alternator as I’ve read it supplies the pump with 13v ? But no idea where to run the power wire too. 2nd issue, when replacing my fuel pump and fuel hanger I managed to break the factory fuel level sender leaving me with no fuel gauge, I’d like to buy the fpg fuel level sender for r32/s13 but the plug it comes with confuses me, I’ve got a detschwerks x1 fuel hanger which has light + pump - level + pump + and a ground, I’m no auto sparky but I’m wondering if I can cut the plug off the fuel level sender and wire the negative to the pump negative and wire the positive to the level positive to get a fuel gauge back ?🥴 3rd and final issue, the reason I want a fuel gauge is because whenever it’s below half a tank, it fuel starves like crazy and runs like a bag of shit even without doing a pull or sloshing the fuel round in the tank, I’d also like to fix this but have no idea what’s causing it, I’ve got a dw420 and a dead head fuel setup meaning the fuel is regulated before it gets to the engine, my only theory is that the return line is to close to the pickup on the pump and when it’s at half a tank the return line is causing the pump to cavitate enough to cause fuel pressure issues, that or the pump isn’t low enough in the tank which I would find strange considering I can’t find a single thing online about it, also if ya wondering how I figured out it happens at half a tank without a fuel gauge, I waited until it started happening and went and filled up and the car took exactly 30 litres every time I tested it, if ya managed to read through this mess I appreciate that and any recommendations , cheers
    • ChatGPT is trash and lies about things I would not expect it to lie about considering many things it's wrong about are very easily verified with google. The S3 R33 GTR shares its steering wheel with R33 GTSTs of the same production year. Part number is 48430-26U17. I'm guessing you have to get it from a car that came with HICAS though, the ER33 is 48430-26U18, but the HR33 diagrams note that part number is still leather vs 48430-26U13 which is not leather-wrapped. They all use the same airbags, so if you need another one you can get it off basically any same year R33 or Stagea.
    • I'm going to run hard lines front to back in the future. That should help dissipate a bit more heat. If not, a fuel cooler might be next 
    • No. The mark is with respect to the cam rotation. None of those things have altered it. When stationary, the cam position stays in sync with the crank position. It doesn't matter if you moved the head 4 feet up. Hence, that mark needs to stay exactly where it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...