Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i believe i heard that the compliance laws were changed and no longer required for 32's due to the shape of the front corner indicators.

my r32 gtr which is just complied about half a year ago doesnt have a side indicator put on. however i dunno its becoz the laws were changed or the compliance place being dodgy ...

my r32 gtr which is just complied about half a year ago doesnt have a side indicator put on. however i dunno its becoz the laws were changed or the compliance place being dodgy ...

im pretty sure its the laws/regs, as they dont put in the fuel filler restrictors anymore due to there being no leaded petrol available (just means they have reviewed it is all)

either way though you just confirmed they arent needed for blue slips so i guess he's good to go :)

read somewhere that its up to each compliance plac as to whether they put the indicators on the fenders because of the shape of the front indicators.

As long as you can see the front indicators up to a certain angle you dont need to put side ones in.

Thats the reason they didnt put any on my 32 when it was complianced

well ive got them on my gtr and its a late 93, my cousin has a early 93 gtst and his has them, a friend has a 91 model gtst and his hasnt got them...

and every1 i looked at when i was looking to buy mine seemed to differ depending on year model...

what model is your car fugi ? or any1 elses for that matter

yea i while ago someone told me it depends on the year. cauz my mate had a 87 or somethin like that and he didnt.. mine is 92..

im just goin to take them off and see what happens. if i cant get a roadworthy after ill be sure to post somethin up so other people dont do the same.. lol

thanks for ur replys

yea i while ago someone told me it depends on the year. cauz my mate had a 87 or somethin like that and he didnt.. mine is 92..

im just goin to take them off and see what happens. if i cant get a roadworthy after ill be sure to post somethin up so other people dont do the same.. lol

thanks for ur replys

mate just do it.. i doubt you will have any troubles...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
×
×
  • Create New...