Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just after a bit of advice for a turbo upgrade on an rb20. Looking at either a KKR 430 or Garrett 2871. I know the KKR is about half the price of the 2871, just wondering if it would be worth spending the extra on the 2871.

Will have the normal mods, 550cc injectors, 040 pump, front mount, full 3" zorst, PFC or similar, intake, etc.

Just after a bit of advice on what to do.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209302-rb20-turbo-choices/
Share on other sites

  Beer Baron said:
best bang for buck is probably an RB25 turbo. past that maybe an HKS 2530 or similar.

yeah already have a rb25 turbo, looking for a fair bit bigger, high mount set up. Looking for 220-250kw...

From memory the 2871 doesn't come in a t3 flange only a t2 which means you will need an adapter plate from t2 to t3 which is a little bit more stuffing around

Better off going a GT28RS, GT2530 or even a GT2535 which is slightly larger

Since your going the bigger injectors, stand-alone ECU etc etc I probably wouldn't go with an RB25 turbo, something bigger and that will make more power will be better suitable

If your looking for a budget upgrade, something up to about 190rwkw then go the RB25 turbo

  abu said:
From memory the 2871 doesn't come in a t3 flange only a t2 which means you will need an adapter plate from t2 to t3 which is a little bit more stuffing around

Better off going a GT28RS, GT2530 or even a GT2535 which is slightly larger

Since your going the bigger injectors, stand-alone ECU etc etc I probably wouldn't go with an RB25 turbo, something bigger and that will make more power will be better suitable

If your looking for a budget upgrade, something up to about 190rwkw then go the RB25 turbo

Horsepowerinabox.com have just brought out a GT2871 with t3 flange and rb20/rb25 six bolt dump pipe flange, for a direct bolt on fit, which is the turbo im looking at, bit exe tho at $1850...

If you are going high mount then don't worry about the flange on the turbo...you can get a high mount manifold with a t2 flange if need be...dump pipe will most likely need to be custom anyway also so i wouldn't worry about that...

However...there is no point in high mounting a kkr430 or even the 2871...keep it low mount if these are your choices...

you can get your rb25 rear housing machined to suit the 2871 and bolt up instandard position.

if you're going highmount, go big if you're going a 2871 or kkr go low and keep it lookin standard.

also internally gated turbo highmounted = very gay imo

  joeleo87 said:
wats kkr???? :D

im also looking at options for a bigger turbo udgrade in the future. the T2 flange means you cant bolt the turbo onto the RB20 ex mainifold?

sorry not too sure about this stuff :nyaanyaa:

Yep T2 flange means no for RB20/25

You need a T3 flanged turbo to bolt on to the standard manifold

KKR turbos: http://www.otomoto.com.au/kkr/turbos/index.html

It goes against the grain but possibly a GT2860RS or a GT2871R in a reprofiled RB25 turbine housing would be reasonably easy and cost effective .

Someone on this forum a while back had a non IW real GT3071R on an RB20 and he felt it was ok though these days you'd used the GT30 0.63 A/R IW housing for convenience sake . Its a fair bit of turbo for a 2L six so may be a bit laggy for some .

A .

  joeleo87 said:
cheers abu,

i heard that most turbo's up from the RB25 hi flow wont spool up quick enough. When buying a turbo for the RB20 how u can tell if it will spool up fast enough?

Well...you search...because too many of us had the same question as you and there are heaps of threads about this already...

the reality is, if you want 220 + rwkw, you're going to have lag, an RB20 needs at least 4000 rpm on board to start pulling. some like this, some dont, if you dont then stick with 200 rwkw and run a smaller turbo which will give you more midrange punch for the sake of 20-30 rwkw up top

  Simon-R32 said:
the reality is, if you want 220 + rwkw, you're going to have lag, an RB20 needs at least 4000 rpm on board to start pulling. some like this, some dont, if you dont then stick with 200 rwkw and run a smaller turbo which will give you more midrange punch for the sake of 20-30 rwkw up top

lag = fine, as long as it makes the power at some revs i dont mind, 3071r is looking the goods. Cams be a good investment if i was going to run a turbo like that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it will take a fair amount of solution but the sodium citrate + citric acid + detergent is cheap stuff. Use laundry detergent instead of dish soap if you want to reduce the bubbles, also you could just buy sodium citrate and add some citric acid to the mix until you get to a weakly acidic solution if you don't feel like dealing with all the bubbling generated by adding everything together. For a fuel tank you need quite a lot of distilled water but it's probably worth the effort.
    • Actually looks like a Nitrous setup now 馃槅
    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 馃槑 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
  • Create New...