Jump to content
SAU Community

R35 Gt-r V-spec Thread


GT51R
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

f*k...who cares...im sure there are people that have better things to do than check the forums everyday for updated information...that repost quote really gives me the shits....the guys just trying to share some info that some may or may not have seen...

Here Here!!! could not of said better myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f*k...who cares...im sure there are people that have better things to do than check the forums everyday for updated information...that repost quote really gives me the shits....the guys just trying to share some info that some may or may not have seen...

Repost! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f*k...who cares...im sure there are people that have better things to do than check the forums everyday for updated information...that repost quote really gives me the shits....the guys just trying to share some info that some may or may not have seen...

Then skip over it geezus some people get worked up about the internet...

They're right the information is months old. You don't have to read the forums everyday to know what if you have 2 month old information on something there's already a thread for just post it in the existing thread.

Merging with existing V-Spec thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure porsche's kicking back thinking... "amatures".

P08_0374_a4.jpg

P08_0369_a4.jpg

P08_0367_a4.jpg

I'm in love with my GT-R, but...WOW, that Porka is just gagging for a thrashing 'round The Island (only 'cause I'm too scared to even imagine going balls-out at The 'Ring...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the hole rr thing would probably scare the piss out of me pushing the thing... pendulam snap oversteer... lol steering leading with the ass around corners with even to much speed...

god it looks sex though.... would give me a hardon and scare the crap out of me at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in love with my GT-R, but...WOW, that Porka is just gagging for a thrashing 'round The Island (only 'cause I'm too scared to even imagine going balls-out at The 'Ring...)

that RSR is flat out bollocksin hardcore pwnage...no two ways about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the hole rr thing would probably scare the piss out of me pushing the thing... pendulam snap oversteer... lol steering leading with the ass around corners with even to much speed...

god it looks sex though.... would give me a hardon and scare the crap out of me at the same time.

Are you touched? That thing is begging for the thrashing of its life and have the anchors to give it plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the face of that Porsche is very intimidating, f**ken just happily smiling, i really hope Nissan bring out something serious and i dont think the rsr can be considered as a road car. :S

you won't see the RSR on the streets anywhere, they are hand made purpose built racing cars (only 25 a year made). Although there are nearly more 997RSR's here in Australia than R35's ATM

and we won't even start talking about the price difference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.prestigemotorsport.com.au/modul....php?storyid=33

So is this the real deal or is it a photochop?

Well, since that article is almost a YEAR old, it's just speculation. Nissan has not mentioned ANYTHING about a EVO version, there will only be a V-Spec and all we know is that it will have more power, less weight, better aero.

Considering the V-Spec will have no rear seats, more carbon fiber I can't see how an 'EVO' version could top that.

Edited by ausgtr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, since that article is almost a YEAR old, it's just speculation. Nissan has not mentioned ANYTHING about a EVO version, there will only be a V-Spec and all we know is that it will have more power, less weight, better aero.

Considering the V-Spec will have no rear seats, more carbon fiber I can't see how an 'EVO' version could top that.

well you could always go FULL carbon fibre, 8 pot racing brakes, ceramic rotors, twin 3" straight through exhaust, larger turbo, larger displacement, say 4 litres, huge lumpy cams, forged internals, no air con, no radio, driver seat only, full racing suspension all wrapped up in semi slicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, since that article is almost a YEAR old, it's just speculation. Nissan has not mentioned ANYTHING about a EVO version, there will only be a V-Spec and all we know is that it will have more power, less weight, better aero.

Considering the V-Spec will have no rear seats, more carbon fiber I can't see how an 'EVO' version could top that.

Geez I didn't realize it was that old....the pics I've seen of nissan testing the vspec version showed a gtr that looked nothing like that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

This months copy of "wheels" has a 2 pager on the V spec, there saying that it may shade 140 kg and pack 400 kw, it also has a photo of what it may look like (love it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we've known since the birth of christ that the v-spec is going to shed weight, thanks 'wheels' for pointing out that it MAY shed 140kg's.

wheels (the holden sponsored mag) is the most f*cking useless mag out there. Still calling it a f*cking Skyline, when it graced the front cover for goodness sakes!!

Even when we had confirmed info about engine, drivertrain etc... they were printing shit like "possibility of a 3.6 or 3.8 v6... etc" retards.

wouldn't trust a single word they print

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...