Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, my gtr came with a nismo speedo which is redline after 8000, im pretty sure this is definitely not the same redline for a stock dash gtr.....is it more close to 7000?.....im just wondering cause id like to know the safe revs for a stock internal rb26 motor like mine....ive revved it past or close to 7500 once, but wont do it again...right now i rev to ~7000 or under...i want reliability more than anything as this is a new drop in motor which is extremely healthy.

thanks...

I doubt you'd be making power at 8000rpm, so why take it that far? :D

Yeah i wont be, its just that i sometimes go over 7000 when driving hard without knowing it...never 8000 or higher though...is there a way to cut out after say 7500 so i dont do any damage to my car?...maybe when i get it tuned or something?

any aftermarket ECU will have a way of setting the rev limit

on my old internally stock 32 GT-R, my tuner set the hard-cut to 8200

at the track, i would change at 7 where possible, but let it run to 7500 in some corners where needed. keeping the revs lower is a good way to keep the oil temperature from going critical on engines without aftermarket oil coolers, too.

Stock r32 GTR has a YELLOW line at 7500 and a RED line at 8000, no point reving past 7500 as you wont be making any more power and the pull in the following gear may even be stronger as you will be back in the meat of the tourque curve

Stock r32 GTR has a YELLOW line at 7500 and a RED line at 8000, no point reving past 7500 as you wont be making any more power and the pull in the following gear may even be stronger as you will be back in the meat of the tourque curve

Unless you have 2530's and poncams and have to rev to 8000+. Some guys don't go above 6k!!! Good old oil pump drives are too narrow on the early 32's and thats part of the reason why 7500-8000 redline.

Thanks, yeah r34 n1 turbos, so 7000 is a good limit to set...is it good practice to tune my car with a rev - cut at say 7000 or just over in my case???

In my situaiton, sometimes when im driving the car hard i drive over 7k sligtly, not alot though, but now im getting used to learning to shift up faster:)

what you have to watch is where in the power band the engine will be when you change gear, you dont want the next gear to fallout of the meat of the power/tourque curve.

What you want is the torque output of the engine multiplied by the transmission ratio in the higher gear to equal that for the lower gear you are about to change out of. That is the correct point to change up.

Ofcourse road car gear ratios being what they are sometimes that point is beyond the redline.

And yes, 7500rpm is as good a number as any, but the RB26 will take occasional bursts to 8000rpm without expensive damage. Just don't do it all the time. The other thing to note is the tachos aren't very accurate, usually reading a little conservative, ie high.

Oh and is you want to try the 11,000rpm thing make sure you video it. :P

Edited by djr81
  • 2 months later...

Thanks everyone, just got my car tuned, and it doesnt make more power after 7000, so i was thinking 7300rpm rev cut, would that be safe, what happens if i reach rev cut, and does it do damage to the motor (surely its better than over revving when you are going hard...)

Also, the n1's run out of punch after 6500-7000 anyway...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...