Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Ive been getting a few p.m's recently asking about the reults ive had with my HKS 3037 Pro S turbo, instead of answering them i thought why not make a new thread lol.

Anyway i had the car tuned yesterday so here are the results

Mods:

Stock Internal RB25DET

Stock intake/ehxaust manifolds

HKS 3037 Pro S turbo kit, 56T A/R 0.68

HKS adjustable internal wastegate

HKS Stainless steel split dump pipe

HKS Front pipe

3" decat pipe

HKS Silent High Power stainless steel catback exhaust

HKS 3" alloy intake pipe

Apexi Power FC

Apexi Power FC Boost control kit

Apexi Power Intake Pod filter

Blitz LM Front Mount Intercooler

Nissan Z32 AFM

Nismo fuel pump

Nismo 555cc injectors

R.I.P.S oil catch tank

Exedy heavy duty clutch

Splitfire coils

Alloy radiator

NGK BCPR6ES spark plugs

The car made 270rwkw on 17psi and running on crap 95octane fuel, Tuned by Andre Simons of Speedtech Motorsport

Picture016.jpg

Picture017.jpg

Im very happy with it considering the fuel im using.

What you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209907-hks-3037-pro-s-results/
Share on other sites

top results mate :D

getting a 3076r strapped on atm. my power target is exactly what you got - 270rwkw at 17psi.

how well behaved is it on the road?

Actually its real nice on the road, 2nd tends to just grip on and the car takes off, but will spin the wheels if you try to, 1st actually grips pretty well to from what i have felt so far, i havnt really tried 1st that much yet to be honest.

Boost comes on fast and it just takes off, its dosent kick in like a switch at all, its a bit hard to explain, but even in 5th gear it still hauls!

why are you only running 95 oct fuel?

Thats all we have in my town, i could have used 98 but that would mean i would have to drive 15mins to the petrol station everytime i want to fill up which is a hassel.

98 would have been great though, if we had it here i would have used it for sure.

Edited by nizmo_freek

98 would for sure. No doubt about better fuel equaling more power if the tune is there to support it.

Dyna pack read a bit higher than out Dyno Dynamic from what most comparo's show here being 15psi/270rwkw usually is what people make here on 17psi with the same turbo etc.

Great result, boost holds nicely too, very minimal spike.

Good to hear the delivery is good, i would have expected a tad snappy with the smaller rear personally... but then that could be the tune somewhat as less ignition is flattening it off just enough for perfect traction by the sound of it.

Would make a good street car :D

Hey mate, nice results!

Could you post up pics of the turbo in your engine bay?? I have one of these on order and should be here in a week or two :D It would be great to see what it looks like

Hey mate

Heres some pics, its all i have at the moment, kinda hard to poke around in the bay with a camera trying to get decent pics, but if you need anymore p.m me and ill try ad get some.

I dont have the turbo heat sheild installed in these pics, i took if off so the tuner coul play around with the acuator a bit.

100_2088.jpg

100_2089.jpg

100_2090.jpg

DSC_1508.jpg

DSC_1514.jpg

DSC_1515.jpg

DSC_1517.jpg

DSC_1518.jpg

DSC_1519.jpg

DSC_1527.jpg

Cheers for the comments guys :P, really happy with the car.

Edited by nizmo_freek

great power figure, do u mind giving us the ball park figure of total cost. boost does hold nicely n i'm sure u great a mixture of great power along with good responce! nice streetable r33!! hame

great power figure, do u mind giving us the ball park figure of total cost. boost does hold nicely n i'm sure u great a mixture of great power along with good responce! nice streetable r33!! hame

Do you mean a price for just the turbo kit? or everything like turbo, injectors, afm, intercooler, clutch, exhaust etc etc??

both! :)

Im looking at a very similar setup and would love to know what sort of price ill come in at.

Cheers

Turbo kit was around $4000nzd, which is alot cheaper than other places are selling them for (i have seen gt-rs kits sell for over 4g), then add atleast 6g nzd for all the supporting mods, thats exhaust, cooler, fuel system, ignition, clutch, etc etc, i could have done it alot cheaper by using cheaper parts, like custom steel exhaust, cheap chinese cooler, cheap fuel pump, etc etc, but i chose to spend a bit extra and get things that fit perfect and have been proven plenty of times to work, it could be done alot cheaper if you wanted though.

:thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...