Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well,

For those of you out there who remember, I was having turbo surging problems with a T3/T4 GCG High Flowed turbo on my RB20. Well after heaps of F***ing around I've now got a GT2530 fitted. Yes the surging is gone but so too has the power.

Where the T3/T4 would start making power and then pin you to your seat until rev cut, the GT2530 at 1.2bar just doesn't have the same "nailed to your seat" grunt.

I'm posting this for 2 reasons.

1. So people can learn from my stupidity ( happens a lot ).

2. Has anyone out there fitted a GT2535 or GT2540 to an RB20 and what are your opinions ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21015-gt2530-not-impressed/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is true but that's also what I wanted to avoid :P

I don't want to have to put vernia cam gears etc, etc on to make the 200rwkw's that I was making. Oh well, GCG say that will make 200+rwkw's so here's hoping after the dyno tune it dose cause if it doesn't I'll probably get the sh!ts and take the car back to standard then sell off all the modified parts and the car itself and buy a Daihatsu Midget 2 :P

So what did you end up getting in the end the Stage 1 450hp GCG turbo?

Did the GCG turbo make boost earlier or later than the GT2530?

The only thing I can think of that is giving you that feeling is possibly the GT2530 is more progressive in its power delivery.

Very similiar to having a Non-BB turbo then fitting a BB turbo.

The BB turbo comes on relatively smooth where a the non-BB comes on hard.

?!?! - That Sucks, don't return the car back to standard however.

Just slap a RB30 in there. :P

I was only making 200rwkw with the T3/T4 ( Very Conservative Dyno so about 215rwkw on most ) but I knew that I needed injectors which I now have. The T3/T4 came in mid-range and nailed you to the seat up until the 8k rev cut.

The GT2530 comes in low and pushes up but just doesn't plant you and hold you. It really feels like a drift turbo but still it just feels under powered.

I just want to drive it without problems for 1 measly year :P

Sorry to hear about the GT2530. Is the T3/T4 turbo much larger than the GT2530? It's all up to personal preference. Some people like a small, quick response turbo - better for street driving and drifitng. Whereas other people (including myself) prefer the larger turbos with a more peaky power curve - where you can actually feel the turbo. To me, standard turbos/small turbos just feel like a NA car but with more power. The power is very linear and nothing exciting at all. I prefer the thump in the chest, then the loud bark of the external wastegate :P

Why not go get yourself a huge T-88 for the RB20? Probably an overkill. Or what about a GT2835 PRO-S? They are VERY nice. Reasonable response for street, and a fair bit of top end too! Rated at 420PS.

I hear ya ! Maybe I'm just used to that big push back in the seat and that's just not there any more.

Only problem is a GT2835 PRO-S = $$$$$$$'s that I ain't got.

There's still one last option which is getting GCG to change the bearing core from a GT2530 to a GT2540 for under $2k now that the hard work's been done.

Should be getting well over 200rwkw with that turbo! What support systems do you have.

Honestly, I have been in a RB20/HKS 2530 powered car that was putting down 230rwkw @ 1.2 bar and it pulled like whore.

Another thing that it may be is have you replaced the pipe from the AFM to the turbo as these can suck shut as you start getting up in power. you should DEFINATELY be getting alot better power than 200rwkw. To get a pipe made wouldnt be more than $100 cos that is what mine is costing new.

Steve,

Just the normal stuff, GT-R Fuel Pump, NISMO Fuel Pressure Reg, Pod Filter, re-chipped ECU. I think I might have to try the new pipe between the AFM and the turbo as it could be a possible cause. Are you getting yours made for $100 ?

Did you get an HKS GT2530 or a Garrett GT25?

Because:

1. If it's an HKS GT2530, you're going to want to run about 1.5-1.6 bar through it to make it sit in it's efficiency range.

2. If it's a Garrett GT25, 210-215rwkw is probably the absolute maximum you'll get out of it, if you're set it up properly.

Merli,

Dunno. I was told that it's a Garrett GT2530 core as sold to HKS but I don't know if that's factual since GCG "COULD" simply stamp a plate with whatever they want it to read and rivet it to a core. I'm not saying they do but it is possible.

Rev/Merli, you say that the HKS 2530 is in it's efficient range at 1.4-1.7 bar - at what sort of CFM/lbs O2? Do you have anything on paper to show this? Not having a dig, but scouring around looking for comp maps (heh no such luck) or some "real" data/facts regarding the HKS lineup - and I don't mean my uncle's neighbour's daughter's boyfriend's friend said xyz. By what measure are you quoting these figures?

DoughBoy,

The Turbine and Compressor housings are both new R34 GT-T housings machined to suit as HKS Turbine housings were hard to find new. It just might be that they have something to do with the power decrease but Brett from GCG assured me that they were close enough to the HKS ones that the difference would be negligable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...