Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well,

For those of you out there who remember, I was having turbo surging problems with a T3/T4 GCG High Flowed turbo on my RB20. Well after heaps of F***ing around I've now got a GT2530 fitted. Yes the surging is gone but so too has the power.

Where the T3/T4 would start making power and then pin you to your seat until rev cut, the GT2530 at 1.2bar just doesn't have the same "nailed to your seat" grunt.

I'm posting this for 2 reasons.

1. So people can learn from my stupidity ( happens a lot ).

2. Has anyone out there fitted a GT2535 or GT2540 to an RB20 and what are your opinions ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21015-gt2530-not-impressed/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is true but that's also what I wanted to avoid :P

I don't want to have to put vernia cam gears etc, etc on to make the 200rwkw's that I was making. Oh well, GCG say that will make 200+rwkw's so here's hoping after the dyno tune it dose cause if it doesn't I'll probably get the sh!ts and take the car back to standard then sell off all the modified parts and the car itself and buy a Daihatsu Midget 2 :P

So what did you end up getting in the end the Stage 1 450hp GCG turbo?

Did the GCG turbo make boost earlier or later than the GT2530?

The only thing I can think of that is giving you that feeling is possibly the GT2530 is more progressive in its power delivery.

Very similiar to having a Non-BB turbo then fitting a BB turbo.

The BB turbo comes on relatively smooth where a the non-BB comes on hard.

?!?! - That Sucks, don't return the car back to standard however.

Just slap a RB30 in there. :P

I was only making 200rwkw with the T3/T4 ( Very Conservative Dyno so about 215rwkw on most ) but I knew that I needed injectors which I now have. The T3/T4 came in mid-range and nailed you to the seat up until the 8k rev cut.

The GT2530 comes in low and pushes up but just doesn't plant you and hold you. It really feels like a drift turbo but still it just feels under powered.

I just want to drive it without problems for 1 measly year :P

Sorry to hear about the GT2530. Is the T3/T4 turbo much larger than the GT2530? It's all up to personal preference. Some people like a small, quick response turbo - better for street driving and drifitng. Whereas other people (including myself) prefer the larger turbos with a more peaky power curve - where you can actually feel the turbo. To me, standard turbos/small turbos just feel like a NA car but with more power. The power is very linear and nothing exciting at all. I prefer the thump in the chest, then the loud bark of the external wastegate :P

Why not go get yourself a huge T-88 for the RB20? Probably an overkill. Or what about a GT2835 PRO-S? They are VERY nice. Reasonable response for street, and a fair bit of top end too! Rated at 420PS.

I hear ya ! Maybe I'm just used to that big push back in the seat and that's just not there any more.

Only problem is a GT2835 PRO-S = $$$$$$$'s that I ain't got.

There's still one last option which is getting GCG to change the bearing core from a GT2530 to a GT2540 for under $2k now that the hard work's been done.

Should be getting well over 200rwkw with that turbo! What support systems do you have.

Honestly, I have been in a RB20/HKS 2530 powered car that was putting down 230rwkw @ 1.2 bar and it pulled like whore.

Another thing that it may be is have you replaced the pipe from the AFM to the turbo as these can suck shut as you start getting up in power. you should DEFINATELY be getting alot better power than 200rwkw. To get a pipe made wouldnt be more than $100 cos that is what mine is costing new.

Steve,

Just the normal stuff, GT-R Fuel Pump, NISMO Fuel Pressure Reg, Pod Filter, re-chipped ECU. I think I might have to try the new pipe between the AFM and the turbo as it could be a possible cause. Are you getting yours made for $100 ?

Did you get an HKS GT2530 or a Garrett GT25?

Because:

1. If it's an HKS GT2530, you're going to want to run about 1.5-1.6 bar through it to make it sit in it's efficiency range.

2. If it's a Garrett GT25, 210-215rwkw is probably the absolute maximum you'll get out of it, if you're set it up properly.

Merli,

Dunno. I was told that it's a Garrett GT2530 core as sold to HKS but I don't know if that's factual since GCG "COULD" simply stamp a plate with whatever they want it to read and rivet it to a core. I'm not saying they do but it is possible.

Rev/Merli, you say that the HKS 2530 is in it's efficient range at 1.4-1.7 bar - at what sort of CFM/lbs O2? Do you have anything on paper to show this? Not having a dig, but scouring around looking for comp maps (heh no such luck) or some "real" data/facts regarding the HKS lineup - and I don't mean my uncle's neighbour's daughter's boyfriend's friend said xyz. By what measure are you quoting these figures?

DoughBoy,

The Turbine and Compressor housings are both new R34 GT-T housings machined to suit as HKS Turbine housings were hard to find new. It just might be that they have something to do with the power decrease but Brett from GCG assured me that they were close enough to the HKS ones that the difference would be negligable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...