Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am uploading the Testing @ Okayama atm. i link it when its done :D

The GTR looks super fast in testing and everyone is raving about how good it is, be interesting to see if it is really that good

racing underground by any chance michael? Credit where credit is due, dammit! :):thumbsup:

[michael]....you are a champion.

when and where is the first round? how many nissans? who are their arch enemies?

under 2 days :thumbsup: (1day and about 16hrs)

Suzuka

looks like from the testing there is atlest 3teams running the GTR :) the Lexus 430SC and the NSX will the gtr arch enemies :D

GTR posted the fastest time in testing

DAY:01

1.XANAVI NISMO GT-R - 1'53.383

2.PETRONAS TOM'S SC430 - 1'53.745

3.RAYBRIG NSX - 1'53.866

....

8.CALSONIC IMPUL GTR - 1'54.723

....

12.WOODONE ADVAN Clarion GT-R - 1'55.167

13.MOTUL AUTECH GT-R - 1'55.395

14.YellowHat YMS TOMICA GT-R - 1'55.578

DAY:02

1.CALSONIC IMPUL GTR - 1'52.720

2.XANAVI NISMO GT-R - 1'52.805

Edited by [Michael]

check out http://supergt.net/jp/ for all your Super GT info (providing you can read japanese, or use a translator!).

I might go check out a round again this year. awesome fun. :P

check out http://supergt.net/jp/ for all your Super GT info (providing you can read japanese, or use a translator!).

I might go check out a round again this year. awesome fun. :laugh:

Or you can click on the english flag up the top for some nice engrish.

http://supergt.net/en/

try to upload it to youtube but it failed :laugh:

Broadcast: Public | Rejected (length of video is too long)

anyone know any program to slip the video in half?

hey Michael what kind of file is it?

http://www.mininova.org/tor/872293

something like this should do the trick

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...