Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what are you going to do about the blow by issue?

its not a blowby issue....its a high RPM oil control issue. If it was a blowby issue it would occur at max boost at any rpm. Dave has previously stated on here how good the engine is sealed and has virtually no blow-by. Funnily Dave runs a rear oil "drain" which i have said in the past does not work...this again proves my theory on this modification. Dave if you want to track it without an issue its a simple fix...give me a call to discuss if you wish.

Edited by DiRTgarage

ahhh I somehow think the new box might got the same way as the old box sooner or later....better start saving for os giken or something.

despite the crap in the morning, in the afternoon the track was pretty good...proper grip through slicks or semis feels brilliant when you've only been used to street tyres

Semis were amazing Duncan. I feel that i didnt reach the limits of them with the short time we had in the afternoon due to the rain etc.

I was on Stueys bum all the way around the track, with him only gaining on the straight. Then the box went :laugh:

  • 3 weeks later...

holy crap, i had plans for this afternoon. i sat down after lunch and starting reading this, didnt know id end up reading 41 pages of posts! i actually swore out loud around page 22 when i found out your engine had popped :)

Massive congratulations for sticking it out and getting the end result you were after. Also thanks for such a detailed thread, ive recently purchased my first skyline, with a 3076 and a few supporting mods making 240ish rwkw so this thread has answered so many of the questions i had about where to go from here. i cant pm yet so if you want to pm me your email id love to ask you some questions.

Cheers,

Sean

Wow, I nearly fell over I think page 21, I had to go for a walk!, Its good to see you had some good people around you with bit of form in your time of need.

This is a must read, Best of luck and I hope you enjoy.

Wow, I nearly fell over I think page 21, I had to go for a walk!, Its good to see you had some good people around you with bit of form in your time of need.

This is a must read, Best of luck and I hope you enjoy.

How do you think it was for Dave and I...bit of a stressful time during the 1st phonecall.

We got it all sorted though without too much hassle.

How do you think it was for Dave and I...bit of a stressful time during the 1st phonecall.

We got it all sorted though without too much hassle.

Yer, it sorted out well in the end, Ive had one of those 1st phone calls and they are stressful times, its good to see you both stood by each other and didnt lose to much time, keep up the good work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...