Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not obscuring the number plate would likely help your cause.  

Not sure why people do that.  What do you suppose others will do with that already public information?

  • Like 1
Not obscuring the number plate would likely help your cause.  

Not sure why people do that.  What do you suppose others will do with that already public information?

Post photo of black r32 no info

'Has anyone seen my old car?'

1992 R32 GTS  modified N/A ( not GTS-T) 
Gold badging 
17" SSA wheels 

Possibly now has full R32 GTS-T 5 stud conversion all round 
fullsize Nismo sticker across top of windscreen (from memory) 

Blanked out numberplate in the photo is due to the photo being taken a few years ago.... In Canberra at the time we had a big crime group knocking off skylines off the forum on a regular basis and they would scope the details of cars off the forum of regular locations etc and come back later and steal the cars 

this is one of the reasons I sold the car at the time 


would be interesting to know if the car is still out there 

think the bloke who bought it was going to swap all his good bits into it and drift 

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...
On 5/10/2017 at 10:39 PM, Steve85 said:

Nice photo. Did you use a camera or a phone to take this? I'm impressed! :)

Thanks. It was with a Nikon D750, but it was a quick snap off a tram so the above is heavily edited, it looked like this off the camera: 

 

20170505-SEN_7469.jpg

  • Like 3
  • 1 month later...
On 07/05/2017 at 4:03 PM, Birds said:

Traffic gaps with a dark 34R through Narre Warren South yesterday, numberplates VSPEC1(?) and female driver. Waved at me but I forgot to toot - sorry!

That would be Ness, midnight purple vspec. Nice girl

8 minutes ago, MissGTR34 said:

That would be Ness, midnight purple vspec. Nice girl

Cool, moving to the area soon, hoping to see more Skylines than I do where I am now :thumbsup:

  • Like 2
  • 6 months later...
  • 7 months later...

Stopped next to a blue (custom colour I think, not TH1) BNR32 this morning on Warrigal rd, crossing North rd towards Oakleigh.

White TE37s and an SAU Vic sticker on the rear 1/4 window.

 

Wasn't in the Nissan unfortunately, took a press car home last night, but the car looked pretty tough!

Edited by alex182
  • 1 month later...
On 9/20/2018 at 10:06 AM, alex182 said:

Stopped next to a blue (custom colour I think, not TH1) BNR32 this morning on Warrigal rd, crossing North rd towards Oakleigh.

White TE37s and an SAU Vic sticker on the rear 1/4 window.

 

Wasn't in the Nissan unfortunately, took a press car home last night, but the car looked pretty tough!

Pretty sure I've seen this one around too. Nice profile pic btw

  • Like 1

IMG_4539.JPG.7b61755e6ddb63a1d3d153782b50c531.JPG

Won't post where this was parked in case it's a regular visitor there - I wouldn't want a beautiful thing stolen and f***ed up by the scum of society. But lovely LM!

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...