Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've posted them elsewhere but anyway....

1995 R33 GTS-T (red coz red is faster)

75,500km

Motul Engine Oil

FMIC

HKS Pod (no box or cold air feed)

2 stage boost controller (7psi / 12psi)

Custom 3" Front/Dump/Cat

Nismo 3" Cat-back

Standard Turbo

Standard ECU

Shootout mode

7psi = 190rwkw

12psi = 203rwkw (leaning out)

Standard mode

7psi = 177rwkw

12psi = 188rwkw

At the end of the day though its just numbers (hopefully that i'll turn into a 13.Xsec pass down the 1/4 in the not too distant future).

I'm also confident that I can get it alittle higher, maybe another 5-8rwkw from afew more cheap mods over the next 2-3mths.

dyno-203rwkw.jpg

Originally posted by Roy13

a std R33 has only 138rwkw's

Thats debatable as it depends on the condition of the ending. But yeah ~140rwkw is probably about right.

what is a FMIC?

Front Mount Intercooler.

benm, you think all stock ecu's run close to 12:1 afr at 12psi and have the afr line anywhere near close to that??? i dont think so dude!!! :D you have a chipped stocky ecu. stock ecu's with stock boost run around 10.5:1 afr! yours is being leaned out somehow and i suspect thats the reason for your very impressive dyno results.

as for my car, i'm happy with the power its making, its not all about peak power, its the area under the graph that counts. that said, i know where i can find power, my intake pipe is crushing under load i need to replace it with a fabricated pipe, as the HPI 34 did...

Benm this is what a std computer does, the lowest line is std boost at the time i think 8psi. The next line 14psi and the top line 12psi. Look at you 12 psi compared to mine std computers trip out over the mass of air going throught the air flow meter.

All R33 with FMIC, aftermarket computers and 15psi of boost only just make 203rwkw, just curios as to what is going on, my main idea is that you boost gauge is telling porkies! You may actually be running 15psi. Your injectors arn't going lean as they are good for about 215rwkw's.

Originally posted by Roy13

All R33 with FMIC, aftermarket computers and 15psi of boost only just make 203rwkw

Says who? Theirs no rule or law that says all cars make the same amount of power with the same mods. Infact i'd give u $100 if u could find 2 cars with identical mods making identical power outputs.

my main idea is that you boost gauge is telling porkies!

Whats my boost guage got to do with anything? The boost "gauge" has nothing to do with a dyno run. The boost is measured on the computer (Alot more accurately too).

Your injectors arn't going lean as they are good for about 215rwkw's.

Technically and in theory yes, but my injectors are 8yrs old and so is my fuel pump so who knows what they are "actually" running at. One thing I have learnt with cars (and dyno runs) is that you can't expect to bolt on the same mod as the guy (or gal) next to you and expect the same power increase, coz it just doesn't happen.

Also like i said... at the end of the day its just numbers. I'm 20sec slower around a track than a stock R33 considering I have more power. It doesn't all come down to power, thats just 1 thing of many.

I'm now chasing that 20sec not the 20kw.

Robo's, that's pretty normal. The higher the pressure the more fuel the ECU usually dumps in unless dictated otherwise by tuning. When you see the opposite it means you have maxed out your fuel system (pump/injectors).

Benm i'm not trying to give you a hard time , and i'm not all R33 with these mods get 203rwkw just that 203 is the most i've ever seen with all these mods they seen to vary from 190 to 203rwkw's with those mods.

My sugesting you boost gauge is saying i have never seen a R33 produce 203rwkw on 12psi, so my sugestion being maybe the dyno's preasure sensor is incorectly calibrated and you were actually producing 15psi. As you do have a 95 which seem to be the go with std computers!!

You have a point with your injectors but with problems as you sugest a graph of air fuel would not be so perfect i am to think. I am telling you this as nobody could give me any feed back on my dyno sheet.

If you wish to gain time not kw's i suggest using a plenom that faces the front mount and reducing the length of all the pipes and maybe diametre if you are going to only use the std turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you tried another indicator stalk? Sometimes these go bad and cause issues.
    • They're so beautiful 馃槏
    • Early last week, I became concerned that the car was feeling....slow. Most of my driving is commuting to/from work and there are few opportunities to get up it and convincingly make boost/power. It drives in vacuum almost all the time. But when you do occasionally get an opportunity, and.... it takes a little longer to start making power, and then there's not as much as you'd expect, and then you run out of road anyway and have to bottle out - it can be hard to be convinced that there's something wrong. But by the end of the week I was pretty convinced. Made an effort to get a decent test run. Took bloody forever to come up on boost and when it did it would only make about 50 kPa of pressure. There was no black smoke, no noise of a boost or exhaust leak, no evidence anywhere of an intercooler hose clamp being sloppy enough to let air escape. So.... not that sort of problem. Brainstorming led to thinking that the boost controller's solenoid might have failed in some way. No active boost control would just give wastegate pressure, which I was more or less getting, and the laggy behaviour could just be "normal" shitty boost response from an uncontrolled highflow. But a little extra 3rd party brainstorming led to the thought that the actuator circlip might have jumped off leaving me with a bluetooth wastegate. So, on Friday, off comes the stock heatshield (which is an annoying enough job on its own) to reveal - yup. WG is wide open. And.... it won't come back. It is jammed in the dump. Put the rod back on with a new circlip and tried driving it to get it hot in the hope that the capture was from thermal effects having been blown into the dump when hot and since cooled. Nope. Won't move, even with screwdriver mediated force when hot. Ran out of time to play. Came back to it yesterday. Unbolted the dump. Was lying under it with the dump jammed up against my guts undoing the bottom 2 bolts. Got them most of the way out and gave the dump a serious heave. It didn't noticeably move, but there was a satisfying "plink" noise from up to. Shuffle out and sure enough, gate is now closed. Nevermind that there was still the better part of an hour after that required to put it all back together. f**ken cars.
    • For your application, where you'll be at that 1/2" size or perhaps larger, yeah, excellent. Although not if you need a tight bending radius anywhere, because the corrugated stuff is not anywhere near as flexible as rubber/teflon cored stuff. But for turbo oil lines? No. Too big. They just don't do the corro stuff down at the ~1/4" ID size that you'd want, and if they did the OD of it would probably be a bit too fat for fitting it into the tight spaces available. I use hoses like that all the time for fuel gases (LPG, NG) and liquid fuels (HFO, diesels, waste oils). When we did the London Olympic cauldron, with the 204 individual burners on it, we had miles of the stuff (although a lot of that was teflon core). A bunch of that crap is still cluttering up the workshop, more than 12 years later!
    • Would something like this be an option  https://processhose.com/products/configurable-metal-hoses/1-2-in-t316-stainless-steel-annular-corrugated-configurable-flexible-metal-hose-assembly-with-ends-t304-single-braid-masterflex-af5550.html I'm looking at this for replacing the OEM EGR when installing a aftermarket intake plenum 
  • Create New...