Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

service station brands often share their fuel and facilities, so you may find shell optimax could in fact be the same physical fuel as Mobil 8000

and likewise, you may find Caltex Vortex 98 is the same as BP 98 - not all brands have local facilities in each state, so they share in some parts

this is what i have also heard from mates who work in refineries. This is especially true when parts of the refineries are temporarily shut down for maintenance or upgrades.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hey,

personally ive used both for a while but i think it depends on your car..

v power was good, but got more backfire and less economy, 310 kms max from a tank

im now on bp ultimate, and after using it consistently for about 2 months, economy kept goin up and its now at about 370-400 ish. less beckfire and drives smoother..

try em both for a month will be easy to tell.

hope this helps

  • 3 months later...

This is interesting...

Im in WA, and we've pretty much only had BP Ultimate as our source of 98 ron fuel... caltex vortex 98 and Peak 98 have only recently become available...

I've pretty much always used BP 98 exclusively as a result... and I'm more than certain my ECU has a tuned rom (it runs quite lean!!! 12.7-12.9:1)... it's ok in most conditions, however, will ping slightly at high load/rpm in certain weather conditions. Anyways, after going for a bit of a drive the other night (minor pinging), I remembered there was vortex 98 nearby (needed to refill, refill warning light was intermitently coming on/off). So off I went, and put a good 25Litres or so of it in. Went for a drive for a good twenty to thirty mins to notice if it made any difference... i was actually expecting it to be worse than Ultimate, as everyone seems to praise that crap.

To my suprise, the mild pinging I was having DISAPPEARED. Go figure. The car also seemed to rev/pull more freely at higher rpms ie. 6000rpm to 8000rpm. I was pretty shocked...

Further to this, another guy I know had his silvia (GT30 based turbo) tuned on Peak 98. If he puts bp ultimate in it, it pings. Again, go figure.

I do NOT use bp ultimate only from one place, so I can rule it out as not being a servo-specific issue. Furthermore, I've found what seems to be inconsitency between some servos selling ultimate... ie. I'd be low on juice, so i'd go and fill up, and find my car to be running like shit and/or ping shortly after filling up at some servos. Perhaps some servos are doing the dodgey (ie. selling contaminated fuel, or advertising 95 ron fuel as ultimate??? again this is speculation).

This may just be a WA issue... maybe the refining process for making the fuel is different over here than in the other states? Who knows... all I can say is, Vortex 98 is now my fuel of choice. I've since flogged the crap out of it, to try and get it to ping, but it refuses to!

To add further insult, vortex98 (where I fill up) is about 6-7 cents a litre CHEAPER than ultimate at my local...

These are just my findings, I'm yet to try peak 98, but I will shortly...

Edited by Wobbz

i was interested in this, and so ive switched from v power, to BP ultimate ..

ive since gone through two full tanks of bp ultimate, and i have driven exactly the same etc etc and yet im getting almost 80 - 100 km LESS per tank.

anyone know why this might be?

Ive used nothing but V power since july 2005 when i bought my car, so perhaps i should use bp for a bit longer than 2 tanks lol, but i will change back to vpower if it means i get mroe K;s from my tank...

Edited by Silver_R34_GT-T
i was interested in this, and so ive switched from v power, to BP ultimate ..

ive since gone through two full tanks of bp ultimate, and i have driven exactly the same etc etc and yet im getting almost 80 - 100 km LESS per tank.

anyone know why this might be?

Ive used nothing but V power since july 2005 when i bought my car, so perhaps i should use bp for a bit longer than 2 tanks lol, but i will change back to vpower if it means i get mroe K;s from my tank...

I'm not exactly sure of R34 ecu's capabilities, but if you're giving it some stick, and it detects mild knock, the ECU might be dumping in more fuel... hence the worse consumption... (either that or retarding ign. timing).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...