Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have been recommended by my workshop to go for a GT25 440HP turbo to achieve the horsepower I am chasing (around 320rwHP) and the 'seat of the pants' torque I am chasing.

I am not so much after a dyno comp winner, but something that comes online not too late (a litte lag is cool, like 4000-4500 for full boost) and really punches hard as I hate the stock turbo - my old WRX with a VF22 pushed MUCH harder.

Anyone used one of the GT25's (internally wastegated model) on an R33? Any comments?

I originally was thinking the GT30 with a TO4B housing, but my mechanic has done several R33s with this setup recently and is getting 320rwHP with 13PSI with stock computer (pretty awesome in my opinion!) and its not laggy.

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21181-gt25-440hp-on-a-r33gtst/
Share on other sites

hey

i am currently about to put the same turbo on my RB20 and around 320rwhp was what i am chasing also. I know a guy with one of these turbos on a CA18 that hits 1bar @ 4200rpm. I was hoping on an RB20 it would hit 1bar by 3900-4000rpm and I would expect it would hit 1bar on a rb25 by 3700rpm (this sound right?).

Anyone else put one of these turbos on a RB20/25?

Thanx

Evan

I went for a drive in a 180 with an RB25 and GT30... very impressive and suprisingly good throttle response. There was nowhere near enough lag to make me think about going smaller if it was my car, but thats just my opinion and i can put up with a bit of lag for good hp :)

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by R33GTS25T

hks gt2530 full boost @ 3800 rpm pulls right through the gears good till 250rwkw

hks gt2835 bit bigger comes on a bit later good till 300rwkw i think...

u think wrong, the 2530 is only slightly bigger than the stock turbo and will give u about 225rwkw, and no way will a 2535 give u 300rwkw.

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by R33GTS25T

hks gt2530 full boost @ 3800 rpm pulls right through the gears good till 250rwkw

hks gt2835 bit bigger comes on a bit later good till 300rwkw i think...

u think wrong, the 2530 is only slightly biiger than the stock turbo, and no way will a 2535 give u 300rwkw.

Originally posted by MFX_R33

If you are going to go to the expense of upgrading your turbo, you may as well make it worth while, and go for the GT30. After driving the GT25 for a couple of weeks you will be, searching for more and kicking yourself that you didn't go for the bigger unit.

Jeff.

Suppose it depends alot on what people are after and what they use the vehicle for?

Guest MFX_R33

Basically, there is not a huge power difference from standard to the GT25. My thought is, if you are not content with the power from the standard turbo, then you wont be content for long with the GT25.

If you are only after a few more kw, then you have to ask yourself if it is worth it, or should I just be happy getting the most out fo the standard turbo (maybe just play with cam's, etc).

Jeff.

Hmm thanks for the advice guys - will consider the GT30.

But to be honest, 320rwHP+ ( 238Kw) is pretty serious power and I understand that 260rwKw is close to the limits of a stock bottom end on an RB25 so I am not sure if the GT30 is going to give me much more expect for more lag and potentially a broken motor when I run it up to 260+rwKw..

320rwHP at 13PSI seems awesome to me - thats serious power and not insane boost, so engine longevity shouldnt be too bad. My concern with the GT30 would be it may run up to say 370rwHP, but how long would the engine stay together? This is my daily driver, I dont want it to detonate after 3 months.

Am I wrong, can the RB25 sustain more than 370rwHP safely for extended periods? If so, the GT30 is probably a better option :rofl:

Good responses guys, got me thinking about the GT30...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dang. I love the little 'oil used' bingo card on the side.   🤣  Well, now they can use a box and an oil-filled goon.
    • Many many moons ago, I was chatting with Andy Wyatt, about his auto ignition tuning. One of the HUGE things he said to me, when tuning for power, right where you hit peak ignition timing for your max torque, dramatically increases NOx emissions. He was finding in testing, particularly on engines you could advance timing beyond peak torque, that backing the ignition timing off a couple of degrees only made for a small drop in torque (compared to if you keep backing it off further the same amount of degrees) but dramatically reduced NOx emissions. I'd say targetting for 14.7, and he's even mentioned in some scenarios going slightly leaner, and pulling a few degrees of IGN timing will help pass for emissions quite a lot. However, who tunes an RB for emissions
    • The main stuff from.Vibrant I see is more their intercooler piping, and everyone raving about their clamps, but when I looked it was about $150 per clamp... I was a bit   I also thought the public price SP had up was high. As Mark said, a normal exhaust shop can fab them. It was many years ago that I had a full exhaust built, but for a full turbo back exhaust, and 2 custom built mufflers, plus a high flow cat, was about $1,100, and that was fully installed, drive in, drive out. I believe SP was about $900 for 2 mufflers, just supplied   These days, I just buy the material and built it myself, because I need to stretch my $$$
    • I'm pretty sure if it's considered a gasoline powered vehicle you have to do certification against a fixed, very expensive certification fuel.  If you add two precats and then replace the main cat with two cats back to back you can get an RB26 to do 0.24 g/mi HC, 1.6 g/mi CO, and 0.3 g/mi NOx on the FTP-75 drive cycle. Found this out courtesy of California's laws at great expense. Divide by 1.61 to get g/km. So even with extra cats + precats you're blowing past the NOx limit by probably 2.3x. Probably the only way to get an RB25 or RB26 to meet euro 4 purely from an emissions per km standpoint and not durability/OBD2 requirements is retrofit at least intake side VVT, clearance the pistons to allow the full 50 degrees of advance so part throttle EGR can be maximized, and change the wastegate control from conventional 7 psi spring for example to one that is always fully open if the wastegate line is at 1 atm or higher and only close it in response to vacuum. See BMW's N54 engine as a reference for how this works. You would need to find space for a vacuum tank to function as an accumulator in this system. That way you can avoid any heat loss to the turbine as much as possible during cold start to heat the catalyst faster. Then find some way to eliminate as much as possible cold start enrichment to light off the catalyst rapidly. Maybe secondary air injection if there's no way to avoid cold start enrichment. Close coupled catalysts in the downpipe are probably necessary. I would also probably swap to EV14s, pick something with the correct spray targeting + dual cone pattern for the intake manifold you're using. EV1 style injectors to pass anything resembling modern emissions requires a very annoying air assisted injector system to break up the droplets at part throttle/idle which still doesn't work that great compared to just having smaller droplets from the injector to begin with. Realistically, you're probably going to be financially ahead if you just pay the fines instead. Or don't drive it into the city center. There's a reason why Nissan never bothered to even attempt certifying an RB for CA/US emissions. The VG30 needed external EGR on top of NVCS to pass in the 90s. Doing all of this work is also distinctly expensive and you're going to struggle to find anyone who is remotely interested in helping. 
    • I remember those, people use to steal them to make bongs.....
×
×
  • Create New...