Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi SAU,

I have dropped an RB25det into my 180sx and it fits but I need to drop it lower to clear the bonnet etc. Im going to slot the engine mount brackets down abit which should give me 10-15mm but im also interested in putting some spacers inbetween the front crossmember and the chassis rail.

What im after is some input as to how this would affect the front suspension of the car. Would it make a difference at all?

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212255-front-subframe-spacers/
Share on other sites

Hi SAU,

I have dropped an RB25det into my 180sx and it fits but I need to drop it lower to clear the bonnet etc. Im going to slot the engine mount brackets down abit which should give me 10-15mm but im also interested in putting some spacers inbetween the front crossmember and the chassis rail.

What im after is some input as to how this would affect the front suspension of the car. Would it make a difference at all?

Regards

Negative effects on bump steer, Ackerman and dynamic camber change.

Cheers

Gary

Will also lower your roll centre.

Basically, it's like having the front of your car lower (geometry gets worse), but you don't have the gain in lowering the CG (well, not as much as lowering the whole front down).

As for how dramatic the change would be, it depends on how low the car is now, but even then, it's hard to say without modelling in a suspension analysis program. Or, someone with lots of experience (like Gary) can tell you how it would feel having all this stuff changed.

Thought as much.

I guess my next question is: would these effects be very dramatic if I was only to use a small amount (say 3-4mm) of spacing?

Also,

Is there any way to counter these effects?

The front lower control arms should always point slightly downwards (to the ground) towards the wheel. So by whatever amount you lower the inner front lower control arm pivot point you must also lower the outer front lower control arm pivot point. That fixes the dynamic camber change problem.

The Ackerman problem can be fixed by moving the steering rack and/or the steering arms (on the upright). The latter is usually the easiest.

The bump steer is usually corrected with spacers at the outer tie rod ends. Start with the same thickness spacer as you used to lower the outer front lower control arm pivot point.

This is why people change the inlet plenum and/or the bonnet.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update: I got the magnet out. I bought 3 different flexible magnetic reach tools, but none of them worked. The magnet on the tip was all less than 2lbs of force, so i had to buy a special cylindrical magnet that had a pull force of 9lbs.  The magnet finally came in the mail yesterday, so i got under the car to get to work. The super strong magnet isn't that long, so i only have about 1 finger pinch lengths to hold it. I was so scared when i was going in the hole, that the 9lb magnet would just fly away inside the oil pan never to be seen again, but i had my butt cheeks clenched and finger gripped on that thing so tight, i managed to get it to suck the other magnet out.  It was a victory for me last night.         
    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
×
×
  • Create New...