Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was looking at importers at first but there is a recent thread about exporters.

why would I use them?

I was looking at the services an importer provides and it seems importers takes all the hassle away (from buying the car all the way to compliance).

What service does an exporter provides other than selecting/buying the car and putting it into a boat?

Thank you

ps. I did a quick search and nothing came up.

Edited by jarthel
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212390-why-would-one-use-an-exporter/
Share on other sites

The only reason you'd use an exporter specifically over an import broker is that you then don't pay the import broker their service fee, so you save a little bit of money.

The reaons you'd use an import broker and pay that bit more are:

- the import broker is probably more familiar with local import laws and can make sure you don't get into trouble there

- an exporter will only have very limited access to a small number of cars from a small number of sources so that will limit your choices a lot

- SOME exporters are not very good and don't care about burning bridges with a one off customer who you'd be as there's nothing to lose, whereas when exporters are dealing with import brokers they have long term relationships to worry about and so can't afford to screw them over

- GOOD import agents will know which exporters to AVOID. Probably the biggest exporter who sells cars to members of the general public in Australia is actually sadly one of the dodgiest and we refuse to deal with them, for example. SO MANY people we've seen think they're saving money by going direct to this exporter, when in reality they get screwd on price, screwd on condition and end up paying a lot more for a poorer car than if they'd gone with an import broker whose first decision would be to avoid these guys. It annoys me so much.... :P

- importers will know what to do when the car arrives, will help with customs clearance, finding a good compliance workshop who does good work at good prices, and a whole lot of other things.

- import brokers have no vested interest in cars since they don't own them, so they can give honest opinions on condition and weather a car is worth buying or waiting for a better one to come along.

And more reasons but that's the basics.... ultimately you need to decide if those points enough to justify paying an import broker, or if you'd rather forego those things and try to save a bit by going to an exporter directly.

Note: I AM an import broker (J-Spec Imports) so assume whatever level of bias you think is appropriate here :/

Ben

The only reason you'd use an exporter specifically over an import broker is that you then don't pay the import broker their service fee, so you save a little bit of money.

snip...

Well, the amount of money the importer requests is quite small in the scheme of things (depending on the value of car). :P

thank you. I suppose that somehow confirms my suspicions on the use of exporters instead of importers. :/

Edited by jarthel

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...