Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Isn't the point of having an engine built by an engine builder the fact that they figure all that stuff out?

Hes a good mate doing in his own time so im trying to help out where ever i can. im supplying all the parts etc

  • 3 months later...

has anyone used a Tomei piston, from my search's people say they are a good piston and that Japanese pistons can be fitted tigher ( 1.9 to 2.2thou), if so it sounds like a good quiet piston apart from the extra cost of them,

how do Japanese pistons compare to the American stuff, any better or just a waste of money????? oh and im obviously referring not referring to an RB30 piston cause they don't make RB30 pistons I don't think

Edited by AngryRB

Isn't the point of having an engine built by an engine builder the fact that they figure all that stuff out?

This^

I assume most just laughed at you, as they don't want to see their newly built engine throw a rod or split the bore. Keep the compression under 10:1 imo or cylinder pressures will skyrocket.

has anyone used a Tomei piston, from my search's people say they are a good piston and that Japanese pistons can be fitted tigher ( 1.9 to 2.2thou), if so it sounds like a good quiet piston apart from the extra cost of them,

how do Japanese pistons compare to the American stuff, any better or just a waste of money????? oh and im obviously referring not referring to an RB30 piston cause they don't make RB30 pistons I don't think

Anything Tomei is generally top shelf.

No issues with the Manley pistons in my evo either. It's all down to the machinist.

Looking at the CP and wiseco pistons in comparison to the Tomei, they have more cooling channels, so probably allows greater head expansion which suits street applications better, a titanium coated top ring sounds good but machining would have to be spot on to bed it in , there's a strange cut out on one side of the tomei skirt , not sure why.. im sure any forged piston will do the job though, just good to compare designs as the jap's seem to do a good job with the engines compared to US specs.

tomei pics are on RhdJapan website

Edited by AngryRB

I'm aiming for 10:1 with a 26 head and Nitto +7cc dome pistons; depending on how much we have to remove from the head to do so keeping acceptable quench and HG thickness etc etc.

should be interesting on E85. Can't decide whether to keep the GT-SS's or grab some -5s/2530s

edit: the nitto pistons are actually JE's

Edited by Blackkers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...