Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey. im a bit confused after reading the R33 service manual. i did try searching but not mcuh luck sorry.

Could someone maybe point me in the right direction or explain what(if any) the differences are between:

Ignition Timing

Base Timing

Cam Timing

This is regarding R33 s2 25t. erratic idle and possible retarded timing. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212932-difference-between-ign-bt-cam/
Share on other sites

Base Timing & Ignition Timing.

Put simply the ECU adds and subtracts ignition timing from the engine dependent on such things as airflow, throttle position, water temperature, air temperature etc etc etc. It takes your base timing (whatever you have set it to) & then via its function works out the ignition timing. Usually an RB26 has a base timing of 20 degrees. Ignition timing varies widely however. You alter the base timing by moving the crank angle sensor. The ECU alters the ignition timing.

Cam Timing

Cams are phased to align to the crank. So an inlet cam may open say 10 degrees before the crank reaches top dead centre. You can alter the cam timing (with the right parts and or if it is a late model RB via Nissan electrical/oily bits) so the cam may, for example, open at 15 degree BTDC. In other words change the cam timing.

so when we check the timing using the timing light and if the timing is retarded to 10 degrees, what timing is that?

The RB25det should be set to 15degrees timing... is that the base timing?

sorry about the noob questions. im confused so needing advise from others.

so when we check the timing using the timing light and if the timing is retarded to 10 degrees, what timing is that?

The RB25det should be set to 15degrees timing... is that the base timing?

sorry about the noob questions. im confused so needing advise from others.

The 15 degrees is your base timing. They do it in such a way as the ignition advance at idle is your base timing. Which in turn (At idle) will be the same as your ignition timing. They can be the same number.

If it is 5 degrees retarded the car will drive like, well like it is retarded.

When the motor is running you can commonly see thirty to forty degrees ignition timing.

Advice, not advise..... :ermm:

Alright i just did a diagnostic and it came up with Error code 21(2 long flashes and 1 short).

so i turned the ignition off, took keys out and started her up.. let it idle for about 5 mins.. slowly started driving.. and the engine check light would come on for a few secs now and then..

i drove back home.. let it idle.. it went away.. i assume that was the ecu doing its adjustments etc...

i then turned it off.. restarted it and turned it off again.. did a diagnostic and came up all ok(55). Tried that twice.. same thing

alright so i took it for a slow spin at first.. seemed ALOT more responsive and idle is now sitting a rock steady 700 or so.

when i gave it boost, Oh my god... its has NEVER revved this cleanly. 7000rpm came up in a flash. same in 2nd, no traction. shifted into 3rd around 6500 and already 90-100clicks. around 5secs.

Does it all seem okay now? Any advice??

i havent checked timing yet(no tools).

Some good reading I had on me. Apologies, cant remember where i stole it from, so don't sue

Spark Timing Myths Debunked

A widely-held myth is that maximum advance always means maximum power. Here’s what’s wrong with this thinking:

The spark plug ignites the mixture and the fire starts burning. The speed of this flame front depends on the mixture, this means how many air and fuel molecules are packed together in the combustion chamber. The closer they are packed together in the same volume, the easier it is for the fire to jump from one set of molecules to the other. The burning speed is also dependent on the air-fuel-ratio. At about 12.5 to 13 air-fuel-ratio the mixture burns fastest. A leaner mixture than that burns slower. A richer mixture also burns slower. That's why the maximum power mixture is at the fastest burn speed. It takes some time for this flame front to consume all the fuel in the combustion chamber. As it burns, the pressure and temperature in the cylinder increases. This pressure peaks at some point after TDC. Many experiments have shown that the optimum position for this pressure peak is about 15 to 20 degrees after TDC. The exact location of the optimum pressure peak is actually independent of engine load or RPM, but dependent on engine geometry.

Typically all the mixture is burned before about 70 deg ATDC. But because the mixture density and AFR in the engine change all the time, the fire has to be ignited just at the right time to get the peak pressure at the optimal point. As the engine speed increases, you need to ignite the mixture in the combustion chamber earlier because there is less time between spark and optimum peak pressure angle. If the mixture density is changed due to for example boost or higher compression ratio, the spark has to be ignited later to hit the same optimal point.

If the mixture is ignited to early, the piston is still moving up towards TDC as the pressure from the burning mixture builds. This has several effects:

* The pressure buildup before TDC tries to turn the engine backward, costing power.

* The point where the pressure in the cylinder peaks is much closer to TDC, with the result of less mechanical leverage on the crankshaft (less power) and also causes MUCH higher pressure peaks and temperatures, leading to knock.

Many people with aftermarket turbos don't change the spark advance very much, believing that earlier spark creates more power. To combat knock they make the mixture richer. All that happens really then is that the mixture burns slower and therefore hits the peak pressure closer to the right point. This of course reaffirms the belief that the richer mixture creates more power. In reality the flame front speed was adjusted to get the right peak pressure point. The same result (with more power, less emissions and less fuel consumption) could be achieved by leaving the mixture at the leaner optimum and retarding the ignition more instead.

Turbo charging or increasing the compression ratio changes the mixture density (more air and fuel molecules are packed together). This increases the peak pressure and temperature. The pressure and temperature can get so high that the remaining unburned mixture ignites by itself at the hottest part in the combustion chamber. This self-ignition happens explosively and is called 'knock'. All engines knock somewhat. If there is very little unburned mixture remaining when it self-ignites, the explosion of that small amount does not cause any problems because it can't create a large, sharp pressure peak. Igniting the mixture later (retarding) causes the peak pressure to be much lower and cures the knock.

The advances in power of modern engines, despite the lower quality of gasoline today, comes partially from improvements in combustion chamber and spark plug location. Modern engines are optimized so that the flame front has the least distance to travel and consumes the mixture as fast as possible. An already burned mixture can no longer explode and therefore higher compression ratios are possible with lower octane fuel. Some race or high performance engines actually have 2 or three spark plugs to ignite the mixture from multiple points. This is done so that the actual burn time is faster with multiple flame fronts. Again, this is to consume the mixture faster without giving it a chance to self-ignite.

Higher octane fuel is more resistant to self-ignition. It takes a higher temperature and pressure to cause it to burn by itself. That's why race fuels are used for engines with high compression or boost. Lead additives have been used, and are still used to raise the self-ignition threshhold of gasoline, but lead is toxic and therefore no longer used for pump-gas. Of course a blown engine is toxic to your wallet.

gallery_14713_1542_24625.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I suppose that's true. Barring almost any situation, I'll never sell so what the market does is kind of irrelevant to me. It's possible I'd make most of my money back. That spreadsheet I mentioned? Maybe I could make back more than what the car's total costs thus far are, but the parts and all that is possibly a different story... Thanks for reading. It was certainly a good moment and just makes the ties to the car that much stronger. It's exciting that the option will be there to bring it over, however I have some plans with a shop that may end up keeping the car there longer, not sure. Coupled with the fact I want to move there and haven't solidified any path yet. So in a way, it feels like I'm in a limbo state that is uncertain; time will tell.
    • No worries, everything worked out in the end. I just wanted to make the point that it doesn't matter where it comes from (I.E Australia), it can be broken or improperly built. I would still purchase from these companies in the future. B2R - Not certain how that finished, this was on a car I wired a few things and street tuned. I know the owner ended up shipping the motor back to Australia for investigation. Hopefully some of it is covered under warranty.  Turbosmart - I always pressure test everything that goes on my car. It's a habit from my career in oil and gas. I run two 40mm's and both had major leaks from the actuator to exhaust portion through the shaft. I returned both, they shipped me back two and one was leaking and the other had a 38mm top (40mm gate with 38mm actuator cap, no idea how that happens). Eventually after a lot of back and forth I found myself with two non-leaking gates. I believe this happens a lot more then people would like to believe but you would never know if you don't pressure test them prior to installation. Crank Motorsport - Issued a full refund and let me keep the seat rails. I turned them into scrap metal for other projects. GKTech - Shipped me out a replacement and asked that I modify it as per my idea and that they would do the same for a future revision. ATP - Can just needed a large shim to bolt up properly.  Haltech - They started an actual proper Beta channel for firmware's a few months back and stopped using the general public for testing. I'm now much happier.  Speedtek - f**k Speedtek. I would love to watch them burn.     
    • I've got a Turbosmart wastegate, ATP catch can, many GK Tech parts and Haltech everything. Everything's been perfect, sorry to hear your experience wasn't the same
    • The only high-power RB I've personally seen go pop after running for all of an hour on a dyno was built by B2R, while being remotely tuned by B2R. The only wastegates I've ever had leak like a sieve, return, still leak, return and get shipped back the wrong ones were from Turbosmart. The only final drive that I've ever purchased that were unusable, twice... were from Speedtek. The only seat mounts that I've ever purchased that placed the seats in the door frame were from Crank Motorsport. The only poorly designed parts that I had the manufacturer confirm should have been designed as per what I mentioned were from GKTech. The only ECU I've had firmware updates consistently break things are Haltech. The only catch can I've purchased that didn't fit in its advertised spot was from ATP. So forth and so on... Moral of the story, doesn't matter where it's from. Do your research beforehand and stick with products and companies you've trusted in the past.    @joshuaho96 If you want it done right, do it yourself.
    • Something coarse-ish. 180 is good.
×
×
  • Create New...