Jump to content
SAU Community

Best # Plate For Me  

24 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Nah cant be assed paying the dept transport $200 a year, so im going for R and S series at a solid $71 once off fee!!

yeah thats what I did on the car Darren.......'S'......re-issued plate

Bike on the other hand costs me $190 each year extra

Nah cant be assed paying the dept transport $200 a year, so im going for R and S series at a solid $71 once off fee!!

'Custom' plates are $200 odd a year, but 'Personalized' plates are a one off fee. JZS147 should fall into the category of personalized shouldn't it? :yes:

But RIS 705 gets my vote anyway.

:banana:

I just got myself RRS250 for the Stag. :banana:

Edited by RubyRS4

Custom you can have any letter and number combination you like up to 6 or 7 letters.

6 will cost you $190 per year and 7 will cost you $220 per year, for example mine is *evil34*

More cool colours available for these too. lol

With personalised you can only have the following:

a-12345 one letter and five numbers

ab-1234 two letters and 4 numbers

abc-123 three letters and three numbers

abcd-12 four letters and two numbers

abcde-1 five letters and one number

Cost is only a once off fee of $170 for these ones, the dash represents the little SA insignia that is also on your standard plates.

I couldnt get evil-34 as it was already taken so i had to settle for the custom plates.

So if you can come up with a good combo that works for you, you can go personalised

With personalised you can only have the following:

a-12345 one letter and five numbers

ab-1234 two letters and 4 numbers

abc-123 three letters and three numbers

abcd-12 four letters and two numbers

abcde-1 five letters and one number

Cost is only a once off fee of $170 for these ones, the dash represents the little SA insignia that is also on your standard plates.

In the past I've had:

UNVME-2

MYTLR-1

EVILR-1

now (for the Stag):

RRS-250

cool so if i get one letter and one number i guess that comes into the "personalized" category???? so a once of payment

No.

Must be like:

ABCDE-1

ABCD-12

ABC-123

AB-1234

A-12345

for it to be personalised. Otherwise its a custom for something like A-1.

:rant:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My understanding is that UV tends to accelerate the aging process. If the car has been garaged, then you could probably get away with extending beyond 10 years. FWIW, in 2015, I had tyres on my 180B SSS that had a 3-digit code (2 for week, 1 for decade), ending in 0, so could have been more than 30 years old, but still worked fine. I did replaced them very quickly, though, once I discovered what the code meant!
    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
×
×
  • Create New...