Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have read through the brake pad user ratings post and found both of these pads to have good feed back for track use, but sum have said that the DS2500's have worn the rotors out quick??? there has not been a lot of feedback with the project mu's, but what is there is saying that they are all good.

My question is what is better for track use? I am a newbie to the track and i dont want anything that bites too hard yet. I am currently running R33 GTR brembo's all round with stock rotors and EBC green pads on a R33 GTS-T. The front rotors are worn out and will be replaced with DBA4000's very soon.

Also will it affect the brake response/feel too much if i run the EBC's on the rear and one of these on the fronts?

Thanks,

Ryan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have read through the brake pad user ratings post and found both of these pads to have good feed back for track use, but sum have said that the DS2500's have worn the rotors out quick??? there has not been a lot of feedback with the project mu's, but what is there is saying that they are all good.

My question is what is better for track use? I am a newbie to the track and i dont want anything that bites too hard yet. I am currently running R33 GTR brembo's all round with stock rotors and EBC green pads on a R33 GTS-T. The front rotors are worn out and will be replaced with DBA4000's very soon.

Also will it affect the brake response/feel too much if i run the EBC's on the rear and one of these on the fronts?

Thanks,

Ryan

Ok, a few things.

1. DS2500's are not hard on rotors. IMHO it is a little bit the other way around with relatively high wear rates on the pads.

2. How much are the HC pads?

3. If you are a track newb then DS2500 is more than enough pad.

4. Don't buy 4000 series DBA rotors - there is a whole thread on how shite they are somewhere.

5. Rear pads can be anything. Just get something that works from cold & matches the friction coefficients of the front pads.

Not having used the HC, but from the specs there doesn't appear to be a huge amount of difference between them & the 2500's. The friction coefficients are the same but the HC appear to have a braoder working range. The 2500s are streetable, but I cannot comment on the HC's as I just don't know. The flat friction coefficient of the 2500's is one of their best attirbutes - particularly if you are new to track silliness.

http://www.project-mu.co.jp/e/product/hc-plus.html

http://www.raceshopper.com/ferodo_compounds.shtml

Edited by djr81
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3767255
Share on other sites

Thanks mate, I cannot find the friction coefficient of the ebc green pads? Will these be ok to use on the back with the DS2500's or the HC's on the front?

What rotors would you recommend?

I will try and find that thread.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3767330
Share on other sites

Thanks mate, I cannot find the friction coefficient of the ebc green pads? Will these be ok to use on the back with the DS2500's or the HC's on the front?

What rotors would you recommend?

I will try and find that thread.

Cheers.

Green stuff claim 0.55 for some of them which is about right. Not sure what you have of the choices, however.

http://www.ebcbrakes.com/greenstuffinfo.html

Rotors. Hmm.

I would recommend you either go expensive eg a Project Mu 2 piece rotor or a DBA 5000 series or go cheap, say an RDA rotor from the group buy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3767374
Share on other sites

You will have read about them in the users guide, but the QFM A1RM is easily better than either EBC Green Stuff or DS2500s in terms of performance, and on par with then for dust/wear etc. The Brembo A1RMs are $149 front or rear. Also the A1RM will work from cold, whereas alot of pads at this level don't. We run them in the front of the rally car, and even as our daily delivery vehicle when the other car is out is fine.

A1RM specs are:

Cold Co-ef 0.40

Hot Co-ef 0.48

Temp Range 0-780

Even if you only got them for the rears they still should save you a few bucks over the Project Mu etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3767406
Share on other sites

hey dude i couldnt be bothered to read what anyone else wrote but i bought the geniun ones for mine. they are heitachi brand pritty expensive to. but dude they are awesome. car stops on a coin.

really happy with them. that also could be a option when changing pads.

later man.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3782987
Share on other sites

These are the ratings we use for selecting track use pads;

Operating Temperature Range

Initial Torque

Fade Resistence

Release

Consistency

Modulation

Pad Wear

Rotor Wear

Looking at only the CoF (maximum at one termperature) is far too simplistic a guide. As a beginner, from the above list, I would first be looking at Initial Torque, Release and Consistency. An example, a pad with a simple CoF may (if the temperature is right) give you good initial bite. But as a beginner you may have a tendancy to lock the brakes, hence a pad with poor Release characteristics would be bad for you. Consistency is equally a no brainer, it's no good having good brake response on one lap/corner and then lousy on the next. You need to learn to trust the feel you get back from the brakes, so it needs to be the same lap after lap. You won't learn anything from driving with inconsistent braking performance.

As you become more proficient, Modulation becomes more important, as it enables you to feel for the point just before lock up. A pad with a simple (high) CoF may have poor Modulation and you can't effectively adjust the braking pressure due to their lack of feel.

Juggling pads with differing Initial Torque front to rear can be an advantage when you don't have brake bias adjustment or ABS. For example, using slightly lower Initial Torque pads in the rear can avoid that end of the car locking up with the first corner hard stab on the brakes needed on many tracks.

Obviously if the budget is tight, then looking at Rotor Wear and Pad Wear are relevant. But based on my experience you are not going to find a pad compound that is suitable for track day use that is gentle on the rotors and/or doesn't wear out fast itself.

You haven't mentioned the ratio of road to track use that you anticipate, so giving a single pad recommendation is difficult. If you do a lot of both, then I would recommend changing pads for the track at the same time as you have the wheels off to change to the track day tyres. If you don't have track day ("R" compound) tyres then pretty much any decent pad you select will outbrake road tyres. If that's the case then Hawke HPS (70% road and 30% track) or HP+ (30% road and 70% track) would be the go. HP+ are a very aggressive pad with good feel, they are a bit dusty and will wear the rotors reasonably, you get nothing for nothing. If you are changing pads for track days, then Hawke HT10's would be top of my list. As you get more proficient, then DTC70 in the front and maybe DTC60 in the rear, they have huge initial bite and so require some skill in their modulation.

Not so simple is it?

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3783514
Share on other sites

I can't give you an in depth look into pads like Gary can, but I run the Project MU HC+ pads on my 180, and am really happy with them. I get minimal fade in my setup, (F:S14 calipers, project MU rotors, braided lines, good fluid, R: stock calipers, braided lines, RDA rotors, DS2500 pads) and my rotors seem to be holding up very well also. A friend runs them in his R32 for track work as well, and he can't speak highly enough of them.

I've only run the 2500's on the rear of my car, and for 1 track day, so I can't comment on their performance.

Dane

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3783687
Share on other sites

I have always said that the Hawke HP+ is one of the best performing pads to get. I swear by them. Never had any doubts with regards to the cars stopping ability/power whether it be on the track or on the road.

These are the ratings we use for selecting track use pads;

Operating Temperature Range

Initial Torque

Fade Resistence

Release

Consistency

Modulation

Pad Wear

Rotor Wear

Looking at only the CoF (maximum at one termperature) is far too simplistic a guide. As a beginner, from the above list, I would first be looking at Initial Torque, Release and Consistency. An example, a pad with a simple CoF may (if the temperature is right) give you good initial bite. But as a beginner you may have a tendancy to lock the brakes, hence a pad with poor Release characteristics would be bad for you. Consistency is equally a no brainer, it's no good having good brake response on one lap/corner and then lousy on the next. You need to learn to trust the feel you get back from the brakes, so it needs to be the same lap after lap. You won't learn anything from driving with inconsistent braking performance.

As you become more proficient, Modulation becomes more important, as it enables you to feel for the point just before lock up. A pad with a simple (high) CoF may have poor Modulation and you can't effectively adjust the braking pressure due to their lack of feel.

Juggling pads with differing Initial Torque front to rear can be an advantage when you don't have brake bias adjustment or ABS. For example, using slightly lower Initial Torque pads in the rear can avoid that end of the car locking up with the first corner hard stab on the brakes needed on many tracks.

Obviously if the budget is tight, then looking at Rotor Wear and Pad Wear are relevant. But based on my experience you are not going to find a pad compound that is suitable for track day use that is gentle on the rotors and/or doesn't wear out fast itself.

You haven't mentioned the ratio of road to track use that you anticipate, so giving a single pad recommendation is difficult. If you do a lot of both, then I would recommend changing pads for the track at the same time as you have the wheels off to change to the track day tyres. If you don't have track day ("R" compound) tyres then pretty much any decent pad you select will outbrake road tyres. If that's the case then Hawke HPS (70% road and 30% track) or HP+ (30% road and 70% track) would be the go. HP+ are a very aggressive pad with good feel, they are a bit dusty and will wear the rotors reasonably, you get nothing for nothing. If you are changing pads for track days, then Hawke HT10's would be top of my list. As you get more proficient, then DTC70 in the front and maybe DTC60 in the rear, they have huge initial bite and so require some skill in their modulation.

Not so simple is it?

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3783811
Share on other sites

Thanks every one for your help, Gary where would you recommend purchasing the Hawke HT10's from? My car is running on RT615's so I can compete in the club sprint class at superlap. The car is mainly used for track days and alike so I will be safe using the pads on the street the ratio is probably 80/20 track/street.

Thanks again,

Ryan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3786147
Share on other sites

Right now I have to choose again, the Hawk’s are $395.00 delivered and the DS2500's are $355.00 delivered?

From what I have read the DS2500's seem to be more designed for street tyres where the HT10's are more for Semi slicks? As I am running RT615's (which have a very high tread wear index for semis) I am a little undecided? I have not heard much about how savage the HT10's are on rotors, does anyone have any feedback?

Which ever way I go I think they will out perform me :D but I am just making sure I get the ones that will suit me the best.

Thanks

Ryan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3799091
Share on other sites

From what I have read the DS2500's seem to be more designed for street tyres where the HT10's are more for Semi slicks? As I am running RT615's (which have a very high tread wear index for semis) I am a little undecided? I have not heard much about how savage the HT10's are on rotors, does anyone have any feedback?

I run DS2500s in my car (350Z w/ Brembos and RE55S). It takes me a good 10mins to fade them out, and since its almost always my pedal going mushy its more a fluid problem than a pad problem. One of my mates used to race Formula Fords and he ran DS2500s.

They're more than adequate for R-Comps, if you're only talking about sprint sessions (which you are if you're prepping the car for Superlap). The DS2500s are more "streetable" than the DS3000s since the latter need activation temperature to reach their peak operating range, but if you're talking about a 3-5 lap supersprint then the DS2500s will suit you just fine. They work from cold and, even when overheated, don't lose their friction.

I'm not familiar with the HC+ pads so I can't comment, but don't write the Ferodos off as a "street only" pad.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3799826
Share on other sites

I run DS2500s in my car (350Z w/ Brembos and RE55S). It takes me a good 10mins to fade them out, and since its almost always my pedal going mushy its more a fluid problem than a pad problem. One of my mates used to race Formula Fords and he ran DS2500s.

They're more than adequate for R-Comps, if you're only talking about sprint sessions (which you are if you're prepping the car for Superlap). The DS2500s are more "streetable" than the DS3000s since the latter need activation temperature to reach their peak operating range, but if you're talking about a 3-5 lap supersprint then the DS2500s will suit you just fine. They work from cold and, even when overheated, don't lose their friction.

I'm not familiar with the HC+ pads so I can't comment, but don't write the Ferodos off as a "street only" pad.

Thanks mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3799871
Share on other sites

Right now I have to choose again, the Hawk’s are $395.00 delivered

Is that fronts and rears?

As I am running RT615's (which have a very high tread wear index for semis) I am a little undecided? I have not heard much about how savage the HT10's are on rotors, does anyone have any feedback?

On the Improved Production Car we get a full season's racing out of DBA5000 series rotors with HT10's and even then they are not shot, but we change them in the off season anyway. On the Production Car the DBA5000 series rotors did the whole Bathurst 12 hour and still look OK for a couple of hours more.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3800214
Share on other sites

Personally i think DS2500s are the most over rated pad i haev tried. They are fine on the street, but nothing special on the track. I find they lack feel and are only a bit better then Race Brakes RB74 and about as good as Race Brakes Comp 2 pads.

I ran Endless CCX and love them. I have cracked a few set of rotors since installing these pads though, not sure if its related, could be?!?!?!?!?! But for stopping the car, no fade and to me the most important thing is feel and pedal modulation, best pad i have used. I have found the DS2500s feel pretty dead under foot with poor modulation in my car. I even tried a second set in case the first set were duds and the second set was no better.

So i would suggest trying one of the other brands that ppl are recommending

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3800962
Share on other sites

Personally i think DS2500s are the most over rated pad i haev tried. They are fine on the street, but nothing special on the track. I find they lack feel and are only a bit better then Race Brakes RB74 and about as good as Race Brakes Comp 2 pads.

I ran Endless CCX and love them. I have cracked a few set of rotors since installing these pads though, not sure if its related, could be?!?!?!?!?! But for stopping the car, no fade and to me the most important thing is feel and pedal modulation, best pad i have used. I have found the DS2500s feel pretty dead under foot with poor modulation in my car. I even tried a second set in case the first set were duds and the second set was no better.

So i would suggest trying one of the other brands that ppl are recommending

I tend to agree with Roy on the DS2500's, they haven't impressed me the few times we have used them. We even tried the newer Ferodo DS2.11 recently and they weren't impressive either, they wore quickly and the initial bite wasn't there.

Endless and cracking brake rotors seem to go hand in hand. That and their rediculously high prices.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3801258
Share on other sites

Yer that is both ends is that good or am i getting ripped off? The guy you recommended never got back to me :whistling:

Thanks Roy I have defiantly taken that on board.

Is that fronts and rears?

On the Improved Production Car we get a full season's racing out of DBA5000 series rotors with HT10's and even then they are not shot, but we change them in the off season anyway. On the Production Car the DBA5000 series rotors did the whole Bathurst 12 hour and still look OK for a couple of hours more.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3801355
Share on other sites

Yer that is both ends is that good or am i getting ripped off? The guy you recommended never got back to me :whistling:

Thanks Roy I have defiantly taken that on board.

That's a good price for both ends, go for it. Is it local supply or imported direct?

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213277-pad-choices/#findComment-3801536
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...