Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well as the title says i am wondering what rods to put in my motor, i have a set of tested and preped stock items and a set of spool rods but have heard and seen photos of both smashed. Now i was aiming high like the 1000hp at tyres mark, but am cutting it back cause it will never see traction otherwise, looking for around the 700 mark maybe slightly more.

Been looking at Howards rods, argos, etc etc etc, what do i do???

need some options of what people have used

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213328-rods-for-rb2630/
Share on other sites

A little bit lighter. I chucked out the rod specs for the argo's. The carrillo ones are around somewhere

Carrillo use their own CARR rod bolts. They can be used for unlimited rebuilds. If something happens to your piston rings or pistons you can undo and refasten them as many times as you like. Some very quick cars use both of these rods - one I know of is in the mid 8's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213328-rods-for-rb2630/#findComment-3768426
Share on other sites

If you have the money to spend just remember that the carrillo rods are lighter, about 70-80 grammes per rod if I recall...

Less reciprocating weight will give you faster acceleration and higher rpm.

The difference is nearly 1k between the Argo v Carrillo and you wont get much change out of 2500.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213328-rods-for-rb2630/#findComment-3768467
Share on other sites

any h beam rod is rated to the 1000hp mark so i don't know what you are all talking about....

its the rod bolt that must be a good quality item......

the only way it would throw a rod thru you block would be a shitty build or the rod bolt has let go.... and that's the only reason, you will never bend a h beam rod unless it comes down to massive pinging or hydraulic lock.... end of story and if it does ping, it will loosen the rod bolts anyways...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213328-rods-for-rb2630/#findComment-3769084
Share on other sites

Ive seen Carillos, Argo, Eagles, Scat and Spool rods fail - all have been due to oil starvation. Any rod will fail if it welds itself to the crank at high rpm.

Rod choice all comes down to your budget and personal preference ( and what you hear )

My engine makes 560rwhp and turns to 8000 rpm daily - it is over 12 months old and has done 126 power runs on a dyno in that time.

There are a few XR6 turbo engines making 620 - 650 rwhp with Spool rods now.

So I know they are good and there are plenty of people and trade customers using them in big power street, drag and drift cars and have been for years now.

Hope that helps.

Edited by Spoolup
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213328-rods-for-rb2630/#findComment-3773287
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...