Jump to content
SAU Community

Is There Any Differences Between R32,33 And 34 Rb26dett Engines?


Recommended Posts

Jus like the topic said, by it i mean look wise (the way itll look in the bay), performance, economy etc. And if lets say u had a 34 gtr engine in a 32 and vice versa would it mean u would have to use 34 drivetrain parts in a converted 32 (i mean R34 gtt drivetrain parts as i believe gtr parts would cost too much $$$, so the car ends up being rwd)

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks wise, providing the engines are in the same condition, look similar but each model recieves updated parts.

So i guess yes, its the same block, but they recieve new better, and bigger parts in what the JAPs thought would improve the newer models. which it has. :blink:

Im no expert by any means. Im sure someone will know on here all the different updates however a search on the forum may help you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

im just askin for a mate of mine who owns a 32 and is lookin at a certain 34 GTR engine, could he just run the normal Gtst's drivetrain with the gtr engine or......???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

How come in magazines when they all compete against each other over a quarter mile in STOCK form, the 32 Beats the other by only points of a second yet the 34 has over 60 Kw more power?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No shiet. I was just curious as to where ZENNON got his figures from since the gentlemens law was in place. Meaning Nissan would never have released figures like that.

The figures are obviously rubbish. How does the gentlemens law be in place but yet he has stated 186kw for an r32? The conversion factors are wrong, not to mention it is impossible for those figures to be at wheels figures.

As far as I know the r34 rb26 did not put out 60kw more than the r32 rb26 :(

Edited by Yawn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Ummm, I wouldnt put much faith in those numbers. My 32 GTR has only a turbo back exhaust, boost restrictor removed and might have been tuned in japan (its still stock ecu though) and makes over 200kw at all 4 wheels... which when you convert to power at the engine would be up towards 300kw... and i dont think those very limited modifications would add over 110kw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Why is the R32 measured in HP and the rest in PS?

186 kW sounds about right. SAU member gtrzillar had his Stock GTR R32 dyno at RE Customs at the Dyno Day, 1st March 08, he hit 185.5 kW at all four wheels with a shitty compliance cat at the time.

I read the GTR R32 makes about 243 kW at the flywheel = 325 HP = 330 PS.

Mind you, the car loses about 20-25% power through the drivetrain as I have been told. (Clarification needed)

"While the published figures from Nissan were quoted as 206 kW (276hp), practical tests showed the car had a factory power output of closer to 330 PS (325 hp) at the flywheel. The lower published figure was Nissan's response to the need to abide by a gentleman's agreement between the Japanese auto manufacturers not to release a car to the public exceeding 280 PS (276 hp) of power output."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyline_gtr

This power output should be the same for all the GTR R32, R33 and R34

I can only expect the power to hit 260 kW 350 HP at the flywheel if it was the R34 GTR N1 engine = V-Spec II Nür and R34 M-spec Nür models due to their twin turbos running 1.1 Bar Boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big diferences am afraid..!!

On the side of the block look for things in the format of 6U, 24U etc.

Engine wise there is a diff tho, power-wise, they were held back. The "Gentlemanly power Rule" applies here.

certain xxU engines have better oilways, cooling, stress relief and strenghtening inside them. 24U..!!!

Look for real N1, see what it has on it, should be matching numbers.

Effectively the same power, but its how far you can push them is the major factor here. IF you can get a genuine first N1 motor..ie mine, then it is a bl@@dy strong motor, and can be pushed without all the add-ons... I know, I done it, and its still strong.

There are obvious casting revisions, like chamferings etc, but the crux is in the inside. 24U is the one you aim for. ask a race tuner that knows his stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In answer to "Styline GTR's" point.

The 34GTR had a smaller compressor, so run out of steam when pushed, as the compressor cant flow anymore without being a restriction.

Oh, and weight is another, the 34 is supposedly more of a lump. Changed from 'Race bred' to 'Commuter bred' along the way!!

Edited by Richieb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Define "Nissan big brakes". You just mean standard R34 4 pots? And...it's not even the offset you need to worry about. It's really a detail of how much clearance there is between the caliper and the back of the spoke/face, which is affected more by the design of the spoke than it is by the offset. If you think about it....take any wheel, say a 19x8 that does fit and clears the caliper. Then add or subtract an inch of wheel on the outside, without changing anything else. You have changed the offset by half an inch, but not changed the clearance situation at all. Same for if you add or subtract an inch from the inside edge. The way for you to work this out is to take a wheel off the car, grab a straight edge and a ruler or two, and start to measure the distances from the wheel mounting face on the hub to the outer face of the caliper, and the outer diameter (that faces the barrel of the wheel) of the caliper. Armed with these dimensions and any other measurement that grabs your fancy while you are there, you can then go to the seller of the wheels and do the reverse measurements from the wheel's mounting face and see if there will be clearance to the caliper. There really should be. I have 17x8 RPF1s +35 clearing the caliper face by a finger tip. Those wheels do have pretty thin spokes with some curvature.... but then so do most wheels to suit Jap cars.
    • So I’ve got a r34 sedan that I managed to get green stickered, meaning I need to go through government approved wof station for my car to be allowed back on the road for some reason my car is certed for 19x8 rims.. I need these wheels  does anyone know what offset will be fine to clear Nissan big brakes? I saw 35et for sale near me, I can’t drive the car to test fit or risk being fined ..   I searched heaps online couldn’t find anywhere..
    • Okay, with all that being said about sloppy blowing from twins, I happily acknowledge the superiority of a single turbo setup on the RB; however, I still plan on double trouble.  I know the -9s were quite popular for some time because they seemed to meet that sweet spot between the -7s and 5s, would introducing VCAM and/or stroking to 2.8L provide the additional displacement/flow to push twins closer to the 500-600 goal?  Does it make more sense for a daily to just do an engine overhaul, slap some -7s on it and enjoy a bit more reliable power?  Has anyone driven a mine's overhauled and tuned engine?  I know they certainly don't approach the power numbers that you drag monsters do down under, but for daily street usage, I just want it to be fun and healthy.
    • Mmmm. Perhaps more correctly stated that the one turbo doesn't actually force air back down the throat of the other. All it does, and all it has to do, is be pumping a little harder than the other turbo (which is an effect of how the turbos are getting driven by the exhaust and inherent resistance to output air flow that each turbo sees up to the merge). If the turbo that is not flowing quite as much then nudges the stall line (because it gets pushed there by the higher flowing one stealing the limelight and moving its own operating point further from the stall line), then you get the behaviour described by Josh. There is no need for air to move backwards in any way. It just needs to be less air moving forwards than is required to stay to the right of the surge line.
    • GTX2860R Gen 2 is an option. No, it doesn't actually do much. The basic problem with wanting 600 whp out of the factory twin turbo setup is a few things. One is that the twin turbo piping is just so, so inefficient. The front and rear turbos are not actually working evenly. The rear turbo is always moving more air than the front. On top of this the OEM rear compressor inlet is rubber that likes to collapse causing a huge intake restriction. The merge doesn't even wait until the intercooler to happen, and it happens at a 90 degree angle. This is why you see some discussion about "turbo shuffle", where in certain conditions one turbo can actually force air to go backwards into the other compressor and stall it out, then once the other turbo recovers it stalls out the first turbo in a cycle until you do something to break out of it. The other issue is that the RB26 is just not that efficient an engine. It needs a surprising amount of ignition timing to reach MBT for a given cylinder pressure so all that time in which the cylinder is pressurizing before TDC is just wasted energy. An N54 might be around 10 degrees BTDC on a stock turbo getting into the boost. An RB26 is closer to 25 BTDC. Net effect is a turbo roughly the size of what HKS uses on the GTIII-SS (smaller than the R3/GCG Japan "GT2860-1" -7s) is only good for maybe 550 crank hp or low 400 whp while a roughly comparable turbo on an N54 can deliver something like 700 crank hp and obviously drivetrain losses are greatly reduced when you aren't burning a bunch of power on keeping a hydraulic pump + transfer case preloaded all the time. So yes, you can make a lot of power but there's a reason why people go single turbo for the numbers you're asking about. Don't forget that the RB26 can't even do a straight line pull without oil starving on the stock oil pan either. Baffles can help, but really you just need more oil capacity.
×
×
  • Create New...