Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys - just after your thoughts on which model will suit better.

it will be a daily driver with the occasional track day or autocross.

my current car is an xr6t - so am concerned the rb20 will lack some power (but will be better on fuel)

the 33 is obviously a tad newer and more powerful but will cost more to run as a daily drive.

on a side note - do the rb's suffer any oil starvation issues under cornering? or should they be fine on the occasional track day?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214623-r32-gts-t-vs-r33-gts-t/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi guys - just after your thoughts on which model will suit better.

it will be a daily driver with the occasional track day or autocross.

my current car is an xr6t - so am concerned the rb20 will lack some power (but will be better on fuel)

the 33 is obviously a tad newer and more powerful but will cost more to run as a daily drive.

on a side note - do the rb's suffer any oil starvation issues under cornering? or should they be fine on the occasional track day?

Depends on how old you like your cars...Do not underestimate an R32 GTST compared to your XR6....as gutless as R32s are off boost...when the revs are there they are certainly capable of giving the XR6 a fright.I know my old one did.Fuel economy is nothing special...it runs lower comp than a R33...As much as I Love R32s I would recommend the R33...fresher car for close to the same money, lots more low end torque also

so similar in performance because of the extra weight in the 33?

i dont underestimate the power of the 32 - i've just become accustomed to having the 450nm from 2k rpm in the xr6t. lazy power.

im just a tad under 6 foot - will a 32 with sunroof have enough room for a helmet?

u can under estimate the r32 gtst, unless it has mods such as turbo, cooler, exhaust..

most ppl just do a cooler and exhaust mod, and they are so bloody slow its not funny. i was going to buy one @ one stage when i had my rx7, and i made the mistake of driving my rx7 to the road test.. it was a fairly stock gtst with cooler and exhaust mods only runnin 10psi...

it was the most disappointing drive of my life. Driving an Integra Type R was more exciting then again, they are faster stock for stock.

until u do mods like turbos and so forth, they arent even worth a mention.

The R33 on the other hand, has enough torque (read 340nm+.. dont know exact figure but im sure its more than 340nm) and power from factory to give ur xr6t a good run for its money.. factor in exhaust and cooler upgrades and some boost and they can be pretty darn fast..

Ive never liked the R33 gtst.. ever but i gotta say that they are a far superior car to the r32 gtst in every single way

i would pick a RB25 over a RB20 any day of the week

the RB20 does very pretty hard but wat ive noticed to be its biggest let down is when u start modifying for more power is the RB20 doesnt spool up turbo's very well

ive driven RB20's with GT30's and they have big lag where as if u bolt a GT35 to a Rb25 it isnt no where near as laggy

The 2.0 litre inline 6 motor dates back to the Hakosuka GTR (1969-1972) with a N/A 2.0 litre inline 6,

which produced an awesome sound from the exhaust and won 58 races.

I've searched and found this link to what the Hakosuka GTR sounds like and the race history of

this amazing car -

RB20 in the GTS-R (1987-1989) continued this awesome sound and is why most buy the GTS-R and

lightly mod it.

Here's what the GTS-R sounds like -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnKpNRZR-B0

R32 GTS-T (1989-1993) inherited the victory spec version of RB20DET from the GTS-R. The R32 GTS-T had bigger

brakes than GTS-R and better chassis, suspension setup but engine was detuned for road use.

For sound = RB20

For power = RB25, RB26, RB30

Since you like torque and are used to it, I would say R33 or R34 GTT with RB30 (3.0 litre bottomend).

Edited by SKYPER

If Rb20 are so bad why is all the R33 and R34 rwd track cars are slower then my GTSt with a turbo upograde on an internally std engine. Is the RB25 a better motor? Hell yes. By the margin ppl make out? NO WAY.

You have to look at the whole picture to understand why an RB20 powered R32 can easily punch with an R33 RB25. First you have the weight, only small advantage, but its basically an extra passenger so is measurable.

But the main reason is the old two stroke style gearing. When R33 owners are grabbing 4th gear at abour 170km.h the R32 driver is grabbing 5th gear. The R32 has much shorter gearing, so everyone that is obsessed about response...well who cares, for a given road speed you have more revs on board so you are making boost and power. So dont get obsessed with rpm where it makes boost, thats why we have manual gearboxes and diff ratios, worry abou tthe road speed where it makes boost. And on that front....have a look at the comparison of

- My internally std RB20 running PFc and TD06-20G

- An R34 GTT with Poncams and GCG Hi FLow and PFc (same tuner and dyno as me)

- Another R34 GTT with Hi-Flow and i think this dyno sheet is on a fully built motor with cams. But lets just say its an internally std Neo sa the sheet could be an old one for the car.

gallery_462_50_14883.jpg

Either way, once you stop worrying about revs where you make power and consider road speed. Then the R32s slightly less weight and shorter gearing ensures you can still do the job.

R33 for sure... RB20 engines are piss weak (if stock for stock) and they look hideous (excluding the GTR).

riiight....u think r33's look good??? haha yeh chek this beauty out...

1105_00.jpg

pffffft....

wat u want is one of these... :)

minor mods on an 32gtst get it moving fairly swiftly

32frontal.jpg

Edited by 32line

r32 punches an r33? lol ive never read something so silly in my life.

stock for stock r32 is the slowest rubbish box in the world from factory theyre what? 7 secs 0-100?

theyre 15yo+ cars and they wish they could pull those numbers

the r33 is faster and its been proven millions of times.

do the exact same mods to each car and the r32 just gets left further behind

Didn't take you long did it Roy? Ha ha :)

I have to say owning the R32 gtst was a good experience. The beauty of the Rb20 is the low cost replacement meaning you can lean on them with little fear of financial backlash :laugh:

I think if your going to stay at or below 240rwkw the RB20 with the right turbo doesn't make a bad unit for a budget compromise, on standard internals.

Edited by rev210
riiight....u think r33's look good??? haha yeh chek this beauty out...

1105_00.jpg

ROFL

u didnt choose the right color man, shooda been burgundy, lol

but seriously, the 33 s2 in black looks teh goodz

no1 should underestimate the 32 though, its physically smaller, lighter, and as above mentioned, shorter ratios

which means huge advantages on track

now to add a few huge generalisations to go with the flow

1. get a 32 for track

2. get a 33 for str8 line spammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

:)

Edited by krogoth

Well there are some drawbacks with the stocker R32's despite the gearbox ratios the gearboxes are weak. Despite the weight saving the chassis stiffness needs a little more help and they are less aerodynamic. The brakes are also not as good.

Depending on what you do tho' those things may not actually matter.

r32 punches an r33? lol ive never read something so silly in my life.

stock for stock r32 is the slowest rubbish box in the world from factory theyre what? 7 secs 0-100?

theyre 15yo+ cars and they wish they could pull those numbers

the r33 is faster and its been proven millions of times.

do the exact same mods to each car and the r32 just gets left further behind

Ok then, if Aurace is in Vic, you are welcome to a drive of my car to help you form your own opinion. Best get some personal experience...its your dime, go with what you find to be right. If you find the right R32 GTSt you shoudl not dismiss it because it has an RB20. That said, find a nice R33 then you should grab it provided the premium $$$ over the R32 can justify it.

Bumblebee...care to come to Phillip Island on Anzac weekend and see if i can change your mind about RB20s :) If i spank your GTR then you have to wash my car in a bikini at the next club meeting....and vice versa :)t

Well there are some drawbacks with the stocker R32's despite the gearbox ratios the gearboxes are weak. Despite the weight saving the chassis stiffness needs a little more help and they are less aerodynamic. The brakes are also not as good.

Depending on what you do tho' those things may not actually matter.

Hey, they are weaker then other boxes. But they are by no means weak as in they break when you start the car. They are reasonably durable provided yo udrive with some care. Mine has +190,000kms on it, its on its 3rd clutch...god knows how many track days i have done in this car (possibly +75 in total, 8 years of track work, 3 years of motorkhanas, a few hill climbs, some runs at the drags where it has done a 12.9 @114mph, two Dutton Rallys)

You just need to respect the fact that they will break if abused....secret to getting a long life out of the box is good Castrol Syntrax 75W/90 . Cant beat it. But yes, unlike most other Skylines which are all but bullet proof in teh drivetrain, the RB20 box is the weakest of the breed. :wub:

Re oil starvation, i just give it an extra 500ml of oil so that when you are up it and some oil gets caught in the head, you still have plenty of oil in the sump. I have run an internally std engine since buying the car. I did spin a bottom end bearign on an engine, but that was only because whilst the car was at the mechanics the car was jacked from the sump and there was a massive dent put in the sump right where the pick up was...that and when they tuned it they didnt put Castrol Edge 10W60 but some Penszoil shit...so the recipe was there for trouble, cheap oil and damage to the sump. Was not happy with the service i got at that mechanics :D

As for daily driver going to the track,

Car 36 -18th And that was with me udner the weather lapping 2 seconds of what i can comfortably do.

Car 36-15th

Thats in a GTSt with a turbo upgrade and basic suspension mods.

LOL, not saying RB20s are the best, they are actually the worst of the twin cams RBs for making power. But they can still get great, reliable results to the point that their use need not be a handicap. But a benefit in that you get to spend the money in areas that actually make the car far quicker.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...