Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not normally one to rock the boat, but I agree with Grant that a 1 post explanation could be helpful: I'm getting a little lost on this as well: too many side issues and tangents!

That said, Grant, you should take a leaf out of your own book: when he asked if they'd fit, you merely said yes, with absolutely no mention of what parts needed to be swapped and changed between standard suspension and the shocks he has coming. If he had just taken that advice at face value and pulled his car apart, there would have been an extremely rude shock for him to discover that he then had to modify the new suspension (albeit with parts he would have sitting there from the std stuff) before he could put it all back together. It wasn't until SK and yourself started discussions that it became clear that it isn't a straight "whip out the old ones and slot in the new ones" process.

Just my 2 cents' worth...

No offence tintended to any involved: this is merely an observation from someone who is pretty mechanically inept.

your right, i sohuld have told him he woudl have to swap tophats.

i wasnt speific enough

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this really has turned into a great thread - very informative

so tell me what i need to do to make them fit, Im rather inept when it comes to suspension

We recently failed to successfully change some CV joints in a mazda 626, so you'll need to spell it out

For everyone else as well

I (obviously) have shocks on the Stagea now, and there's nothing wrong with them, other than creaking on braking (anyone know how to stop this?)

The r33 gtst struts that are coming are FREE, and they're lowered so I thought I'd fit them

apart from the tangents, all everyone's said is 'do it' or 'don't do it'

TELL ME WHY, just so that I will know in future how both work

Tangent#5073: I had creaking issues on braking and around slow corners, but it was suspension bushes causing the noise... Once they were greased up, it was like pretty much silent again... Hope that helps...

TELL ME WHY, just so that I will know in future how both work

Well, from what I've come to understand:

The GTST suspension is not valved/sprung correctly to handle the heavier Stagea front end.

But you can put the rear GTST suspension in the Stagea, so long as you swap the hats (taking the bolt pattern from the GTST's 115mm to the Stagea's 80mm) so it will bolt up into the back of the Stag.

How's that for your answer? 5 pages later :banana:

:wub:

other way round..

33 gtr front shocks are alright for a stagea, and it takes the heaver front end into account.

the rear is the same as a 33 gts-t, bar the top hats, but i wouldnt use them... the stagea is heavier, and has ALOT more rear overhang than that of an R33 gts-t... remember torque == force x distance.. so the extra weight, and being further from the fulcrum point makes the 33 gts-t shocks a bad idea.

go buy a set of coilovers to suit a stagea, or have the 33 ones re-valved to suit, or buy sydneykids set... just dont put shocks designed for a smaller, lighter car into it.

Excellent, I'm pretty clear now

A Question for Grant, if you're still paying attention

How do your struts handle?

Are they installed 'as is'? i.e: bolt straight on (apart from the rear hats)?

What do they feel like on the track?

I'm in the process of installing a set of the Sydneykid shocks, springs, stabilisers and a few other bits in my car at the moment. I'll let you know how it feels to drive and ride in in a few days - even the first few days should provide some idea of the improvements everyone else who has used them will attest to.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...