Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt5


Dean_HR31
 Share

Recommended Posts

Andrew, I see where ur coming from however I havnt played GT4 but GT5 is just ridiculous. Why should it be harder in a game than in real life? But u know what i wouldnt mind it being harder on a game but GT5 is beyond that, its to the extent of impossible, especially using a steering wheel.

The drifting side of GT5 has obviously been designed so u can only HALF do it with a controller, where u can turn the wheels full lock from one way to the other within a second. What u need to basically do with the controller on GT5 to drift is literally full lock the wheel back into the bend before it whip lashes and then full opposite lock again before u lose it & keep repeating this to maintain half a slide.

Thats a load of (*&^^**&, because it certantly isnt the way it happens in real life.

I am very surprised however that u are putting down the physics on GT1... because i can VERY confidently say the power oversteer, low speed & high speed drift physics are in a completely different ball game to the rest of the series.

For example the open wheel diff effect is NOT existent AT ALL in GT1 like it is from GT2-GT5. If u were to do a stand still on a slight hill in GT1 the rear would instantly slide to the direction of the slope where as in all the rest of em, the car some how stays straight! Even when u let go of the brakes and continue wheel spinning its SOMEHOW straight!

Gran Turismo has a LONG way to go, because graphics wont cut it for me. They need proper car sound that makes u really smile, better loss of traction/power oversteer physics & just more car feel like R Factor & the rest of the real simulators..

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ It's been a while since I had a bash on the original Gran Turismo, but from what I remember the cars were too hard to hold in slides and link corners. I should dig it up one day and compare it back to back with GT4.

I would like to give GT5 a shot, but don't see myself even having a decent TV anytime soon, let alone a PS3 and wheel and the game :thumbsup: I'd drop by your house and take you up on your offer/challenge bit I think you're in a different state :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hmmmmm I don't know what to think, as the very same criticisms were leveled at GT4 for drift when it came out, and I admit I thought along the same lines as well. Oh, the countersteer is too touchy, it's too hard to drift smoothly blah blah. Now, after a solid 2 years playing the game, I can link entire tracks, smoothly.

I'll admit, I haven't played GT5, but I think it might be a case of re-training yourself on how to slide, and once you do become acusstomed to the way it handles, it might be even better.

Thats because youve gotten used to the game, and that explains it in itself... youve gotten used to the games retarded physics, and now you can drift... good for you, but it simply shows that the physics are f**ked, because even you admitted after 2 years, you can link an entire track, anyone with decent car control skills, and drift experience in real life, shouldn't have to play the f**king game for 2 years just to get used to its drift physics. Not swearing at you man, its directed at my hate for whats happened to the great GT series. All down hill from the original... pathetic.

Ive been saying it all along, and people thing im just an Xbox fan boy. Truth is, Forza2 is good, but its still short of a real simulator.

Dean, you'll be waiting forever for that sim on PS3 man... because it will never come out. The only "sims" are on PC, and you've already played/been playing the best of them! All PC needs, is a GT/Forza based sim. Where you can purchase everyday style cars/street sports cars like the jap imports etc. with some awesome ass physics like rFactor/LFS etc. and there you have it...

Consoles are for casual gamers man... they ain't gonna release a game that only 5% of people in total who own the consolse, MIGHT buy.... I think the new GTR might be coming out on PS3 - not even sure on that one. Just heard it from someone.

Do this one thing, and you wont ever play a racing game on your PS3 again.

Join a community like OMR - check it out on YouTube, look for like the Aus V8 Series for instance, the videos. Its f**king spectacular, when you race online with REAL opponents and REAL physics... with like 6-44 online racers depending on the game. You will bloody not wanna stop. These guys race for real, its like real life racing minus the real cars. All flag rules, warm ups, quals, realistic damage/wear.

I played NASCAR 2003 with 43 other racers, doing a 100% length race at Talladega (went for like 3-4hrs non stop) and finished 5th. About 15 people DNF from big smashes etc. It was just like watching it on TV but better.. the accidents were JUST like the real deal... its f**king the most immersive gaming experience ive had to date! Im not a HUGE fan of simple oval round and round racing... but dont knock it till you try it. It may have been round and round but when you can draft with another racer and catch the main pack after a minor slip up... and be in the race again and bump draft, the whole sha bang.... f**k its the best. Yellow flags, pileups... and thats just NASCAR!

Games like rFactor with the Porsche Cup mod in particular, is one of the best series you can race in.

Give it a go, you wont be disappointed. Very friendly and helpful bunch too!

And seriously... dont ya'll agree that GT5 completely does NOT deserve the title of "The Real Driving Simulator"? f**kin crock of shit. False advertising... should sue Sony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • we can only guess exactly what happened from our keyboards, but to me it looks like they were targeting 27 but the wastegate was too small or poorly controlled and the boost crept up, that is quite common
    • Good points!  Took those for granted - though I *did* actually give an example of winding boost up more than it had been before where I wasn't actually specifically looking for more peak power.  The Toyota Starlet dyno plot that I shared and mentioned showed an overlay from the previous tune it had and the one I'd redone, I left the boost targetting the same as the old tune but then after peak power I ramped boost up by a good 5psi or so over what the old tune had at the same rpm. The reason I felt comfortable with this (though the owner of the car had a "are you sure?" moment when I suggested it) is that the setup wasn't turbo limited, it was largely head sealing limited and the owner was a bit concerned as for the last few seasons he'd had issues with head lifting - sometimes not completing an event without having some headgasket issue, so he didn't want to run any more boost than it was. The reasons I was ok with raising the boost a good 5+psi MORE than that was that I left it where it was in the middle, and only increased it where VE (and therefore cylinder pressure vs psi) were dropping hard and I didn't stop the torque from dropping, just reduced the drop.  Well, there is that and the fact that the previous tuner had it overtimed by near 7degrees at peak torque - but that's another story haha.    I didn't really go into detail about that "turning it up more" thing but now you've mentioned the "not detuning", sometimes the boost *can* be turned up higher than you'd expect if the setup allows for it and you do it smartly.  I've tuned things to run 30psi on BP98 "safely" that a few years ago (or still?) people would cry that it was a stupid idea - but given they were well intercooled, low EMAP turbos and only doing that kind of boost where VE is dropping etc I was pretty confident it wasn't as cowboy as it sounded at face value and we never ended up with issues as a result of it.     
    • they choose the number of psi (27) around 4200? Could it produce more at this engine speed with the same turbo?
    • one thing escapes me, if the turbo spool provides the maximum boost and we can't control anything before that, how can the boost be higher by it alone.   here around 27 psi at 4200 then up to 32 psi at 6500 rpm   how does the tuner do this
    • I'm still not sure what you are trying to acheive, but I wanted to clarify something about Lithium's response to your question...   Only within certain limits. All of the examples Lithium gave were of detuning for a particular reason. Before the engine/turbo/wastegate combination has hit full boost, you can't increase it....the wastegate is shut and the turbo is pushing as hard as it can Once the combination has hit the target (controlled) boost, you generally have full control over whether it makes more or less boost, because it is being limited/reduced from its potential. This is generally done by controlling the wastegate In the top end, with an undersized turbo, it is possible you won't get to your target boost anymore if the turbo is choking up. In this case you cannot increase boost any more without changing the setup. No change in cost compared to any decent build, other than tuning time to get the engine to make less power than it is able to at a certain point
×
×
  • Create New...