Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There's an op ed on Motor Trend, wondering where the LF-A has gotten to.

It was Ed Loh who first noticed: "Funny," he said. "Once the production GT-R arrived, the Lexus LF-A prototypes disappeared from the Nurburgring."

Toyota's problem is this: The GT-R has set the performance bar incredibly high for the next Japanese supercar. And Toyota being Toyota, delivering a supercar that's second-best to a Nissan is unthinkable, especially if it's going to carry the Lexus badge. The LF-A has to be faster than the GT-R, in a straight line, and around the legendary Nordschliefe. Otherwise it risks being perceived a failure.

Why Toyota would suddenly have an issue delivering a performance car that's second best? The last time I checked they were a pretty conservative company, and didn't like trying something new. Nissan's beating them on JGTC and their F1 team only gets to see the podium when they're standing around looking up at the winners.

The only international-level series they did reasonably well at was WRC, but it appears the shock of coming first was so great that they ended their WRC program to join F1 and stick to what they knew.

Edited by scathing
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

they do have the potential to build fast cars considering their Super GT results have been in the top 5 so far. They just haven't built anything awe inspiring since when I was in highschool. Same goes for honda, although they did make the S2000 and the new civic but it just didn't have that OMPH.

I reckon all Toyota can do is outgun Nissan in another direction. i.e. create a monster mid-mounted V8 RWD Lambo eater. They seem to be heading down that path from the YouTube videos of the next Supra (i think it was a V8/V10?)

They will be wasting their time trying to take Nissan's customers. Everyone's wrapped by the GTR, plus the media campaign for it was so strong Toyota will have a very hard time convincing the world to get a 21st century Supra.

Also i don't totally buy the article's comment that Toyota HAS to beat the GTR or it'll be a failure. It only needs to keep up, make strong sales, and cater for a global market. They're already going to have an affluent, niche customer base with their wanky 'F1 inspired' Lexus punchline. And even by milking the Lexus badge as their ultra-performance model also shows they're conscious of PR, niche markets and providing what the GTR lacks (an aura of class). Lexus hasn't got a strong racing heritage like GTR or Ferrari does, so they're using the Lexus brand to provide theat 'glow' which makes us go wild for 'GTR'.

GTR is an all-rounder. Toyota will probably look into an exotic supercar with a premium price tag. That's where i'm putting my money.

Edited by R338OY
I reckon all Toyota can do is outgun Nissan in another direction. i.e. create a monster mid-mounted V8 RWD Lambo eater. They seem to be heading down that path from the YouTube videos of the next Supra (i think it was a V8/V10?)

They will be wasting their time trying to take Nissan's customers. Everyone's wrapped by the GTR, plus the media campaign for it was so strong Toyota will have a very hard time convincing the world to get a 21st century Supra.

Also i don't totally buy the article's comment that Toyota HAS to beat the GTR or it'll be a failure. It only needs to keep up, make strong sales, and cater for a global market. They're already going to have an affluent, niche customer base with their wanky 'F1 inspired' Lexus punchline. And even by milking the Lexus badge as their ultra-performance model also shows they're conscious of PR, niche markets and providing what the GTR lacks (an aura of class). Lexus hasn't got a strong racing heritage like GTR or Ferrari does, so they're using the Lexus brand to provide theat 'glow' which makes us go wild for 'GTR'.

GTR is an all-rounder. Toyota will probably look into an exotic supercar with a premium price tag. That's where i'm putting my money.

Good point. I agree Toyota doesn't require a supercar that rivals the GTR directly but instead should focus on niche markets provding more class, more exotic visual presence and could go even more hi tech. Take advantage of their F1 image and resources. Mid engine, rear wheel drive and V10 could be a winning formula.

Their turn over on the Camry is still higher than the new GTR anyway ;).

word is.. new Supra is comming out soon..

Do I smell a new GTR vs. Supra argument comming on?

Toyota has to pull something special out..

ive always lol'd @ supra vs gtr arguments.. coz there isnt one..

its never been gtr vs supra.. its always been gtr vs porsche and supra thought it could take a hit @ the gtr.. but the gtr was only ever made to win races and kick porsche to the curb.

as for lambo killin supras.. that would be awesome.. but the gtr already does that lol

id love to see a merc killin lexus thou.. luxo barge vs luxo barge

its never been gtr vs supra..

well, yeah- it has

because both represent the pinnacle of Japans front engined, turbo-charged high-performance cars

the fact that the specs (apart from AWD) and prices where so similar meant they were natural competitors

the LF-A (or what ever it ends up being called) will no doubt look better, but the R35 will just get on with being the better supercar :thumbsup:

who honestly cares?

The GTR is a great car, and i'm sure the lexus will be too.

I'm more wrapped that the next gen performance cars from Japan will get the European competition running scared

thats right. its never been gtr vs supra.

nissan didnt make the gtr to take on the supra. it was made to defeat porsche.

toyota didnt make the supra to beat the gtr.. it was to thrash the american muscle cars.

supra owners then took it upon themselves to challange the gtr and vise versa but that was never what the manufactures intended.

they were both after different markets. never against each other

I work for Toyota and I can tell you I've now waited 9 years for anything decent to get as a company car (and still waiting).

Heck I'd be happy if they bring out the Corolla 'Blade' with the 200kW V6 from the Aurion (as they have in Japan) but alas nothing on the horizon.

We only ever missed out on the Supra because of the stupid number plate holders - Japan wasn't willing to modify the bumper moulds to meet Australian ADR specs (tightar$e$)

Anyway - it will be a LONG time before the big T releases a Supra replacement. Yes the LF-A will make it be about 2010 and there may be the mooted Toy-Baru WRX based Celica replacement by that time, however realistically the next thing will be a Hybrid Sportscar like the FT+HS concept and that won't be done till about 2012 in Japan so maybe 2014 for us (if we get it)

Till then I hope you all have fun in the TRD Hilux - cos that's where the Australian money is at.

TRD Hilux is da BOM!!!

more potential too!

BUT toyota australia are taking the reliable conservative road for long term sales rather than high performance "risks". Nissan has been losing % of sales since they dropped the Pulsar badge and are only just getting back up there with the Navara and others holding their ground.

The GTR will get ppl into showrooms, but they need to get their reputation back. Not that it's bad now. But they dont have a NEW car that you think, if i had the $$ for a specific purpose thats what i'd get.

Eg. Small car, you'd go Mazda or Toyota. Medium car - Toyota Ford Mazda, Large car - Holden Ford, Ute - Toyota Holden Ford... etc

Although the larger FWD layout cars are great for a daily driver and build quality is better than Ford or Holdens, ppl in Aus cant seem to look past the whole "Need a RWD" mentality.

As for the LF-A it will be aiming at the Merc's, Bimmers and lesser extent Austin Martins etc. I dont think the Lambo and Ferrari are in the league they are aiming at.

ppl in Aus cant seem to look past the whole "Need a RWD" mentality.

Which is exactly why Nissan should drop the Maxima and bring in 2 door and 4 door Skylines instead.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...