Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There's an op ed on Motor Trend, wondering where the LF-A has gotten to.

It was Ed Loh who first noticed: "Funny," he said. "Once the production GT-R arrived, the Lexus LF-A prototypes disappeared from the Nurburgring."

Toyota's problem is this: The GT-R has set the performance bar incredibly high for the next Japanese supercar. And Toyota being Toyota, delivering a supercar that's second-best to a Nissan is unthinkable, especially if it's going to carry the Lexus badge. The LF-A has to be faster than the GT-R, in a straight line, and around the legendary Nordschliefe. Otherwise it risks being perceived a failure.

Why Toyota would suddenly have an issue delivering a performance car that's second best? The last time I checked they were a pretty conservative company, and didn't like trying something new. Nissan's beating them on JGTC and their F1 team only gets to see the podium when they're standing around looking up at the winners.

The only international-level series they did reasonably well at was WRC, but it appears the shock of coming first was so great that they ended their WRC program to join F1 and stick to what they knew.

Edited by scathing
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

they do have the potential to build fast cars considering their Super GT results have been in the top 5 so far. They just haven't built anything awe inspiring since when I was in highschool. Same goes for honda, although they did make the S2000 and the new civic but it just didn't have that OMPH.

I reckon all Toyota can do is outgun Nissan in another direction. i.e. create a monster mid-mounted V8 RWD Lambo eater. They seem to be heading down that path from the YouTube videos of the next Supra (i think it was a V8/V10?)

They will be wasting their time trying to take Nissan's customers. Everyone's wrapped by the GTR, plus the media campaign for it was so strong Toyota will have a very hard time convincing the world to get a 21st century Supra.

Also i don't totally buy the article's comment that Toyota HAS to beat the GTR or it'll be a failure. It only needs to keep up, make strong sales, and cater for a global market. They're already going to have an affluent, niche customer base with their wanky 'F1 inspired' Lexus punchline. And even by milking the Lexus badge as their ultra-performance model also shows they're conscious of PR, niche markets and providing what the GTR lacks (an aura of class). Lexus hasn't got a strong racing heritage like GTR or Ferrari does, so they're using the Lexus brand to provide theat 'glow' which makes us go wild for 'GTR'.

GTR is an all-rounder. Toyota will probably look into an exotic supercar with a premium price tag. That's where i'm putting my money.

Edited by R338OY
I reckon all Toyota can do is outgun Nissan in another direction. i.e. create a monster mid-mounted V8 RWD Lambo eater. They seem to be heading down that path from the YouTube videos of the next Supra (i think it was a V8/V10?)

They will be wasting their time trying to take Nissan's customers. Everyone's wrapped by the GTR, plus the media campaign for it was so strong Toyota will have a very hard time convincing the world to get a 21st century Supra.

Also i don't totally buy the article's comment that Toyota HAS to beat the GTR or it'll be a failure. It only needs to keep up, make strong sales, and cater for a global market. They're already going to have an affluent, niche customer base with their wanky 'F1 inspired' Lexus punchline. And even by milking the Lexus badge as their ultra-performance model also shows they're conscious of PR, niche markets and providing what the GTR lacks (an aura of class). Lexus hasn't got a strong racing heritage like GTR or Ferrari does, so they're using the Lexus brand to provide theat 'glow' which makes us go wild for 'GTR'.

GTR is an all-rounder. Toyota will probably look into an exotic supercar with a premium price tag. That's where i'm putting my money.

Good point. I agree Toyota doesn't require a supercar that rivals the GTR directly but instead should focus on niche markets provding more class, more exotic visual presence and could go even more hi tech. Take advantage of their F1 image and resources. Mid engine, rear wheel drive and V10 could be a winning formula.

Their turn over on the Camry is still higher than the new GTR anyway ;).

word is.. new Supra is comming out soon..

Do I smell a new GTR vs. Supra argument comming on?

Toyota has to pull something special out..

ive always lol'd @ supra vs gtr arguments.. coz there isnt one..

its never been gtr vs supra.. its always been gtr vs porsche and supra thought it could take a hit @ the gtr.. but the gtr was only ever made to win races and kick porsche to the curb.

as for lambo killin supras.. that would be awesome.. but the gtr already does that lol

id love to see a merc killin lexus thou.. luxo barge vs luxo barge

its never been gtr vs supra..

well, yeah- it has

because both represent the pinnacle of Japans front engined, turbo-charged high-performance cars

the fact that the specs (apart from AWD) and prices where so similar meant they were natural competitors

the LF-A (or what ever it ends up being called) will no doubt look better, but the R35 will just get on with being the better supercar :thumbsup:

who honestly cares?

The GTR is a great car, and i'm sure the lexus will be too.

I'm more wrapped that the next gen performance cars from Japan will get the European competition running scared

thats right. its never been gtr vs supra.

nissan didnt make the gtr to take on the supra. it was made to defeat porsche.

toyota didnt make the supra to beat the gtr.. it was to thrash the american muscle cars.

supra owners then took it upon themselves to challange the gtr and vise versa but that was never what the manufactures intended.

they were both after different markets. never against each other

I work for Toyota and I can tell you I've now waited 9 years for anything decent to get as a company car (and still waiting).

Heck I'd be happy if they bring out the Corolla 'Blade' with the 200kW V6 from the Aurion (as they have in Japan) but alas nothing on the horizon.

We only ever missed out on the Supra because of the stupid number plate holders - Japan wasn't willing to modify the bumper moulds to meet Australian ADR specs (tightar$e$)

Anyway - it will be a LONG time before the big T releases a Supra replacement. Yes the LF-A will make it be about 2010 and there may be the mooted Toy-Baru WRX based Celica replacement by that time, however realistically the next thing will be a Hybrid Sportscar like the FT+HS concept and that won't be done till about 2012 in Japan so maybe 2014 for us (if we get it)

Till then I hope you all have fun in the TRD Hilux - cos that's where the Australian money is at.

TRD Hilux is da BOM!!!

more potential too!

BUT toyota australia are taking the reliable conservative road for long term sales rather than high performance "risks". Nissan has been losing % of sales since they dropped the Pulsar badge and are only just getting back up there with the Navara and others holding their ground.

The GTR will get ppl into showrooms, but they need to get their reputation back. Not that it's bad now. But they dont have a NEW car that you think, if i had the $$ for a specific purpose thats what i'd get.

Eg. Small car, you'd go Mazda or Toyota. Medium car - Toyota Ford Mazda, Large car - Holden Ford, Ute - Toyota Holden Ford... etc

Although the larger FWD layout cars are great for a daily driver and build quality is better than Ford or Holdens, ppl in Aus cant seem to look past the whole "Need a RWD" mentality.

As for the LF-A it will be aiming at the Merc's, Bimmers and lesser extent Austin Martins etc. I dont think the Lambo and Ferrari are in the league they are aiming at.

ppl in Aus cant seem to look past the whole "Need a RWD" mentality.

Which is exactly why Nissan should drop the Maxima and bring in 2 door and 4 door Skylines instead.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sag as in the windows start to slowly open themselves, or they're just slow to go up/down with engine off?
    • It looks like it needs a big worm gear drive on it to control the rotating, not a few sloppy pins!
    • As Duncan said, first there was OBD, which few cars used, then came OBD2.   Now an interesting point, OBD2 isn't even for what you want to do. OBD2 is for emissions testing. There is some sensor data on OBD2, but it's up to the manufacturer what they're putting on it. Most scan tools operate on UDS, which like OBD2 is a standard built on-top of CAN. UDS specifies how to structure a message, what very limited things mean such as "read memory address" but it does not specify what is stored in which memory address, that is all up to the manufacturer. You either a scan tool compatible with that vehicle, or to know how to reverse engineer all the data, which can take a VERY long time and a lot of vehicles to get it right. Oh and then the manufacturer does a firmware update and changes what's where... Ask me how I know that as fact Oh, and by the time you've got the scan tool that supports all the manufacturers stuff, well, you're back at "But a consult cable and the Nissan software" The main difference being most manufacturers software these days works with the same hardware readers, as the readers are built to support J2534 which is another standard for how the PC communicates with the tool to make it do specific things on the car...
    • Rotisserie is fully assembled apart from centre connector which obviously isn't required until the car is on it. It packs away fairly neatly and doesn't take up too much room. (Now that I actually have some room after my clean up!) Overall very happy with the quality of it.  Assembly was a piece of piss.  The only thing I didn't like was that the pins that lock the rotation lock wheels in place were a bit of a dick in a bucket scenario. It allowed the arms to rotate a significant amount even when locked in place.  To fix that i measured up the hole and went and grabbed a couple of 18mm fully threaded bolts and a thread tap to suit. I ran the tap through top and bottom so it was threaded both ends.  Then just threaded the bolt through both sides.  It has made a massive difference which hopefully you can tell in the before and after video how much difference it made. 20250207_161431.mp4   20250207_161431.mp4 Hopefully back working on the car over the next few weeks.   20250207_162801.mp4
    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
×
×
  • Create New...