Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If I lived in the city and never left hte city I would consider fwd... but honestly.. if I have to drive over 60kph I want a rwd car... why... it will turn better and that means I will not hit some dead shit doingg stupid stuff trying to kill my family... there is the other idea that I dont want to run over some kid who happens to run out infront of my car either. rwd handles better and turns better... the difference increases as the speed increases. dispute it with some kind of proof and i would change my mentality...

The other idea why I hate fwd is going up a hill with my trailer fool of bikes. do that on a wet road with a few of the boys in the car... good times...

i like burnouts too... fwd burnouts are crap. dont let the bean counters win and make cars for cheaper and sell them at a premium.. oh wait.. I live in aus... crap..

If it only works once a year.. its a good year?

Someone correct me here, but i was under the impression that the supra 2jz, had a faster 1/4 time than an r33 gtr, and was renowned for its excellent neutral handling despite its curb weight(hmmm do i see a similarity to the r35)

BMI I would imagine would be a pretty good indicator considering theres a pro driver in each ride. it's not gospel, but worth taking a look at,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leSnYtGJ8gk

If I lived in the city and never left hte city I would consider fwd...

What's this got to do with the LFA / GT-R?

rwd handles better and turns better... the difference increases as the speed increases. dispute it with some kind of proof and i would change my mentality...

It depends on the situation. FWD is better in low-grip conditions as the nose can pull you out of a slide. Also, that stability in the nose makes it "safer" for your average pleb that would freeze up at the first sign of wheelspin. Understeer is safer than oversteer, both in terms of recovery from a slide and impact if the driver is unable to recover.

(BTW, I much prefer RWD because its more fun and a better platform for a driver's car, especially one with a reasonable amount of torque. But I still know FWD is superior to RWD in certain places, but those places are where you'd take a constant AWD car over either anyway.)

Also, apparently Lotus' chassis engineers "found that for a given vehicle weight, power and tire size, a front wheel drive car was always faster over a given section of road. There were definite advantages in traction and controllability, and drawbacks such as torque steer, bump steer, and steering kickback were not insurmountable." This is in reference to the second generation Elan, which was a FWD turbo. Autocar, who are a respected automotive magazine, called it "the fastest point to point car available" on its release.

Edited by scathing
I'd imagine

that Toyota are more concerned with becoming the #1 car maker on the

planet.

Correction 'Sustaining' they are currently the biggest (volume) car

manufacture in the world - I believe second is GM

Edited by Jimmy Boy

I'd sort of hope Toyota are running somewhere as a result as their product line has been... well, lets just say, Camry's are the 'New Beige' and Lexus are just sort of large comfy barges with widgets that cost a bit more.

They're Practical: Yes

Value for money: Yes

Work more often than not: Yes

Makes the company decent money: Yes

So boring, even the cops don't bother you: Yes

GM and Ford mostly make utter shite now: Yes

Neighbours think your a nice chap when you start it at 4:30am on a Sunday morning: Yes

Chances are, if you've bought a Toyota in about the last 5-8 years, its been for those reasons and probably not done you any ill with your purchase. In fact I'd commend them for any of those reasons and your a sensible person for doing so.

What Toyota don't make anymore is anything 'interesting'

I don't mean 'interesting' like, heated mirrors, rectum massagers in the seats, self-parking, DVD players and gas jets to drop down from the roof that can knock out unruly children.

No, interesting like-

It gets 25L to the 100km

It makes more noise than the big day out

It has enough torque to drag a dead elephant

It makes old people sneer and 'tsk' a lot when one goes past

It makes parents lock up their daughters at night, with a length of chain

It'll make the cops just start shooting before flicking on the lights and then issue defects for the bullet holes in the side.

It'll make people think your the biggest fucken delinquent ever

It should (theoretically) be faster than someone else's car you know

Toyota don't make anything like that now. Even if you don't or can't own something like its something to aspire too or just look at for shits and giggles.

Edited by MK2
No, interesting like-

It gets 25L to the 100km

It makes more noise than the big day out

It has enough torque to drag a dead elephant

It makes old people sneer and 'tsk' a lot when one goes past

It makes parents lock up their daughters at night, with a length of chain

It'll make the cops just start shooting before flicking on the lights and then issue defects for the bullet holes in the side.

It'll make people think your the biggest fucken delinquent ever

It should (theoretically) be faster than someone else's car you know

lmao - seriously, that's the funniest shit I've read all year. And I want a car like that, too...actually I have an RX-7, so I qualify on your first point...

Edited by vrfour
Camry's are the 'New Beige'

Camry drivers are the new Volvo drivers.

But yeah, I can't think of anything Toyota's built in the last decade (at least) that I'd actually want to own. Plenty of cars I'd recommend to other people, if they didn't care (and didn't want to care) how they got from A to B...but that's it.

Latest LF-A video - they are doing a 'race' version for the Nurburgring 24 hour race apparently - doesn't sound or look too bad (Even somewaht Supra-esque on the side profile ;-)

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/superca...ed-at-the-ring/

Look up the Lexus ISF.

Toyota is in talks at the moment with Japan to get it in Aust.

400 or 500 odd BHP. Cheaper then an M3 and the AMG merc. And quicker.

Whilst heavier then the M3, and only pushing 3 more KW (100KG heavier) it does 0 - 100 from memory 0.3 seconds quicker...

8 speed flappy paddle... :down:

It also understeers a whole bunch more than either car, so the IS-F is great if you want to go fast in a straight line with an awesome soundtrack (i.e. looking for an AMG competitor) but not so good if you want something that can handle corners (i.e. an M3 competitor).

the lf-a sounds very F1 from the video link above

i could swear that was a gallardo passing if i didn't see the lexus, they sound identical even the down shifts

Latest LF-A video - they are doing a 'race' version for the Nurburgring 24 hour race apparently - doesn't sound or look too bad (Even somewaht Supra-esque on the side profile ;-)

lexus have entered a factory team to run the LF-A in the Zurich 24HR next month, Its in the top class against the mighty 997RSR's, Vipers and Aston Martins. I was surprised nissan didn't have a GTR up and running. One of the privateer teams is building one but it won't be ready in time for the race

i have just changed from a modified r33 gts-t to a stock JZA80 Supra TT and the Supra handles ALOT better than the Skyline ever did. The car 'feels' big but is a very comfortable drive. They are also deceptively quick. have seen bog stock 6spds run very low 13s and even a 12 with CAI and catback so they certainly match the GTR for performance. torque delivery is unbelievable and unmatched in its field. Once you own and drive one, they are a very hard car to fault. TRC system helps to put the power down very well, and with it off, the car has no dramas lighting the rears when stock.

I imagine the Lexus LF-A will compete very strongly with the R35 GTR, and I hope does. The more performance cars on the mark, the better the chance of keep the dream alive for us enthusiasts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...