Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ofcourse the GTR Deserves the title...It's proved itself to higher named and Priced Cars Around that track...And though it might not be the quickest production car out there but for what it is it has the Name :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-454606
Share on other sites

The "Nur" name for the R34 GT-R is more ascociated with the lightened pistons, rods, and "balanced" engine that are common with the Nurburgring 24hour GT-R race car, and the Super Taikyu Race car, than with the standard GT-R's laptime around the 'Ring.

I think Nissan was trying to pay tribute to the GT-R's connection with Nurburgring, rather than boast about a quick laptime.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-454935
Share on other sites

Tacking on a rider to the whole Nurburgring lap record debate- according to the info i have at hand the current lap record at the Nordschleif (spelling) is 7:32.5s set by a 2001 Gemballa GTR600 (read: modified Porsche) driven by Wolfgang Kauffman.

However i have a feeling that this record may have been surpassed since then by another Porsche offshoot possibly the Gemballa GTR750 or RUF R Turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-456078
Share on other sites

True that's correct but hardly what you'd call a production car.

Back in 96 the 33 gtr was heralded as the best production car in the world by the International press. This was then backed up by the odd interesting lap time around the Nurburgring.

Still...big call in my opinion, but hey, I'll live with it...eh eh.

Sebaz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-456171
Share on other sites

R34 held the title for a short while till the gt3 put it back in it's place. Not bad for something that's hardly mentioned around the word "supercar".

Still, a Porsche is a Porsche. I'll own one one day. Will sell right nut just to have one...... :confused: Maybe not! :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-456333
Share on other sites

The Nurbergring badge is, "in honour of the Skyline's success at the famous European circuit in the face of more powerful opposition".

That's from a press release when the car was released.

As for the record: It's held by a car called the Gemballa GTR EvoII (680kW, 700Nm, TT flat 6), then comes the RUF Turbo R, then the GT2. Noone's punted a genuine Ferrari/Lambo/etc round the old 'ring cause it's too freakin dangerous!

And yes, Gemballa and RUF are manufacturers like CSV and HSV are. They reengineer Porsches and stick their own compliance plate on them. Like BRABUS does with Mercs. Which leads me to an interesting shootout about to be published:

R34 GT-R N1 vs BRABUS E-V12 (fastest saloon on the planet at a speed-limited 340km/h). It's a twin-turbo 7L V12 in an E55 E-class body. If you're interested, BRABUS won. But the publication stated:

"The GT-R, bang for yer bucks, is the superior car here with more tuning potential. How we would've loved a fully tuned version from a fabled house like Garage Saurus or Autech."

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-457545
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Sonic

Which leads me to an interesting shootout about to be published:

R34 GT-R N1 vs BRABUS E-V12 (fastest saloon on the planet at a speed-limited 340km/h). It's a twin-turbo 7L V12 in an E55 E-class body. If you're interested, BRABUS won. But the publication stated:

"The GT-R, bang for yer bucks, is the superior car here with more tuning potential. How we would've loved a fully tuned version from a fabled house like Garage Saurus or Autech."

Got a link for that read?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-457601
Share on other sites

It's going in a print publication. World scoop as there isn't meant to be any Brabus E-V12s in the country. Mag is released soon, can't say what mag as it would ruin the scoop...

I don't think the Nismo GT-RZ would be able to catch the Gemballa GTR round the old 'ring. It's the only car to make former world rally campion and Porsche test driver, Walter Rohl break into a sweat and claim that he was scared by the performance. Not just by how fast it went, but by how controllable and user-friendly it is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21499-gtr-nur/#findComment-458493
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...