Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure on cost, but you have a new ext. housing (ie: new turbo), so you should get a good trade as 0.86a/r housings are very popular, thus can be resold very easily.

Give your turbo supplier a call and see if they are willing to trade, with cash adjustment, or give Kyp at ATP a call.

Nope Matt's is definitely a GT30, same as mine on my 3.0ltr. Hence why we want to drive each others cars to feel the difference between the 2.5ltr and 3.0ltr engine, as our engines almost have identical bolt on parts.

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Not sure on cost, but you have a new ext. housing (ie: new turbo), so you should get a good trade as 0.86a/r housings are very popular, thus can be resold very easily.

Give your turbo supplier a call and see if they are willing to trade, with cash adjustment, or give Kyp at ATP a call.

Nope Matt's is definitely a GT30, same as mine on my 3.0ltr. Hence why we want to drive each others cars to feel the difference between the 2.5ltr and 3.0ltr engine, as our engines almost have identical bolt on parts.

where abouts are u located in al? id be very interested in meeting up with u guys when my cars done to have a look.

but yeh ill defiently give my turbo supplier a call, and ATP.

is your car running yet?

Car was running, but currently being stripped and rebuilt as the machinist/crack tester missed a hole/crack in the block and i had oil weeping through, from one of oil drain galleries. Obviously not paying for anything, just inconvenienced as i am without my car again; especially when the build exceeded all my expectations/goals just on the run-in tune.

I am located in the Western suburbs, 5mins from Calder Park Rwy. Would be good to meet up once all our cars are running properly, unfortunately Matt had some issues over the weekend as well, so i couldn't drive his car.

Running a Extreme Turbo Manifold and the setup is currently internally gated. I have compared pictures of Kyle's manifolds with the ETM manifolds and they are very similar in design and quality. The only reason i went with ETM is that, at the time of order i never heard of 6boost and after i paid for the manifold, 6boost started getting a really good reputation on SAU. I agree with what Kyle has stated; that a really top quality, efficient, manifold will require better boost control at low boost settings. He is obviously trying to go out of his way to help you resolve the issue and sounds like a honest person.

Your set-up and Matt's (Yellow R33 GTST) setup are almost identical, except he is still using the 2.5ltr and you have a 3.0ltr, you both have a 6boost manifold and he even has the 90deg extension for the gate. Why isn't he having boost creep issues? The difference; he has a 0.8#a/r ext. housing on his GT3076R, you have the same ext housing on a bigger turbo that has a bigger ext. turbine. Is it starting to sink in now? Go to ATP, trade your ext. housing for a 1.0#a/r housing and your problems are solved, instead of spending twice as much on a 2nd WG or a bigger WG.

Just to sabve confusion, which there seems to be a bit of :happy: A 3076 and 35R do not run the same exhaust housing, do they? ;) The GT30 series turbo runs a certain sized turbine. The GT35 series turbos run a larger turbine again.

So all being little math buzzards, A/R is only a ratio of cross sectional area in the scroll to the radius of the scroll at the point the area in measured. So whils the housing shatre the same ratio they are not the same housing. They cant be, the larger GT35 turbine is well , of a larger diameter. So that means for the housign to be mounted on it then its "R" measurement is larger to cater the bigger turbine. So to maintain the 0.86 ratio then the cross sectional area of the scroll at that point needs to be larger. So the housign is nto only different.

You wouldnt expect a 0.86 GT28 turbo off an SR20 to be the same as a 0.86 housign off a GT35 or T04Z turbo.

Im not sure the bigger housing on the GT35 will do the trick , its already bigger. Not to mention that that the outlet diam of the GT35 housing is probably bigger to allow for the larger turbine. The reason why a smaller exhaust housing on a big turbine often flows better then a larger housing on a smaller turbine

Don't understand about 50% of what you just wrote Troy, read over it about 5-10 times and still no go, sorry.

As stated previously; speak to the people in the business (turbo dealers: ATP, GCG, etc) and discuss the issue. From my chats with my mechanic i still believe changing the ext. housing will solve the issue.

Just something i just thought of Troy. When a std turbo is hiflowed, they fit bigger wheels inside the std housings, so it just goes to reason that more than one wheel size can fit in a housing. I don't know too much about the engineering or a turbo, but that is why i have stated that Andru speak to a expert.

I do know that the same a/r rating do come in different sized housings, not sure if that is the case between the GT30 and the GT35 as they belong to the same "series/family" of turbos

Don't understand about 50% of what you just wrote Troy, read over it about 5-10 times and still no go, sorry.

A grain of sand can be twice as big as another grain of sand or a planet can be twice as big as another planet, it's still twice as big. GT35 0.86A/R housing is bigger than GT30 0.86A/R housing..

A grain of sand can be twice as big as another grain of sand or a planet can be twice as big as another planet, it's still twice as big. GT35 0.86A/R housing is bigger than GT30 0.86A/R housing..

Genius.......... :nyaanyaa:

Did you continue reading after the first line of my post before posting?

A GT3071, 3076, 3082 and 3582 turbine housing are all identicle, the only difference is the size of the hole bored in them for the turbine wheel, which is bigger for the 3582, all the others have the same size exhaust wheel. You could take a 3071 .63 turbine housing, machine it out to GT35 size and slip it straight on, it would be identicle to buying a GT35 with one already on it.

Secondly to that, the smaller turbo explains boost control. Some people in this thread have said remove the exhaust. This is the worst thing you could do, more back pressure/more retriction will create lower boost, so leaving it on will giv eyou the lowest boost possible. Some of my customers street/race cars pick up 10-15 psi of boost when the drop their 3" exhaust at the track. The 3076 will be holding lower boost because it offers more retriction and back pressure hence more air will exit the gate.

I will reinterrate what I have said 2-3 times now Andrew, I have NUMEROUS RB30, 25/30 and 26/30 engines that have no boost control isues with a 44mm gate. I have at least 10:1 ratio of ones that have No issues to ones that do. You have an issue with the fact that I told you a 44mm gate should be fine, but what would you have me say?? If people are on a budget or doing things as cheap as possible, heck, even if they aren't, do I tell every customer to go and spend another $350 on a bigger gate over a 44 when 95% of people have no issue?? DO I just offer my advise to each person that it MAY work but they should consider a 60??

I empathise with your position, I have been thru this on a customers car myself before, we put 50/50 pump fuel and tolulene in and brought peak boost down from 27psi to 21psi, we then changed the intake manifold to something better and it came down even further again. Other than that, we now run the wastegate from the turbine housing where possible. I understand you feel its dodgy, I think the exact opposite, I'd PREFER to run it off the turbine, and do so on my own car, everyone of my friends cars, and any customer that will listen and let me do it. You have better boost control, more hp, faster spool, and I PERSONALLY don't think it looks dodgy. Each to their own. As I said earlie tho, if the gate isn't a restriction, why does it go up when you fit it back on the manifold?? Theoretically it should stay at 13psi when open. Hope you've removed one of those springs.....

6BOOST

kyle, dont take what i said the wrong way, (i'm andrews mate that spoke to you on the phone) i know it will work welding it to the housing, but the cars got a plazmaman plenum, rocker covers will be painted, compressor cover might be polished, and wiring may also be hidden later on, hes trying to go for a neat engine bay, and trying to keep shit hidden. hes seen a few bays where basically all you can see are the 3 main things, rocker covers, plenum, turbo and i think thats what hes aiming for.

hes also looking at upgrading to a TO4, yes even though the car isnt running properly, an upgrade is already on the cards, and it will be troublesome trying to sell the turbo with the provision for the gate hanging off it

lastly, i dont think its something that should have to happen, he should be able to control boost off the manifold, real question being how we are going to go about doing it

By sending me the manifold and paying the difference to a 60mm gate and letting me modify it to suit. It'll work, no question. I would however like to know if anyone has really pulled the second spring out of th egate, I'd really like a dyno graph to show it also, and if it doesn't go past 21-22si, I'd like to see it run to redline, or to whatever rpm it takes to hit 21-22psi. Its getting too hard to diagnose when I can't see fist hand whats going on, except that others, in large numbers have had no drama's, its gotta be fixable.

6BOOSt

finally the answer ive been searching for

we've finally been able to fix the issue and the car is holding boost =]

below is a dyno chart of our findings

dynopx6.jpg

the above shows a modified manifold with dual ports that lead to a 60mm port that leads to the gate.

one is with a 44mm gate, and the other with no gate.

so in conclusion, we had to increase the diamatre of the manifold and run a 60mm gate.

my only issue now is finding a 60mm gate.

so the search continues.

cheers to everyone especially 6boost and the certain few who knew wat they were talkn about.

look forward to when the car hits the road =]

Edited by R34NRG

that is a print out, nothing drawn as such, they were both the same colour n shit to ray changed the colour of the lines, one just looks chunky. low one is no gate, high one is 40mm gate with no spring

paulr33, one run is with no gate, the other is with no spring in the gate, hence its coming on song so late. the run with the gate but no spring was more to determine if it was big enough, thats why the spring(s?) were left out

edit - i believe kyle was going to do an exchange on gate + mod the manifold, but andrew just wanted to get the car done with as little hassle as possible, so ray modded the manifold, hoping to see it work with the 44mm, but gates too small, so now andrew will be upgrading gate

Edited by VB-

Have sorted Andrew out with a new tial 60mm at cost and will be also refunding him money in return for his used gate as well, if he didn't get it today, should have it tomorrow. Look forward to seeing the final power firgure, we know its flowing some unrestricted air at least;)

6BOOST

  • 9 months later...

Old post but im very glad you guys have sorted this problem. (ive read through the whole lot, and albeit painfull in some places is a very good thread).

Im having exactly the same issue here in NZ with a turbo manifold i had made by a local guy. By all accounts my setup is very similar to Andrews. The manifold builder has now made me another manifold which apparently (i havent driven it yet) holds boost in first and second yet once the car is in third looses the plot.

I was also looking to avoid having a gate stuck out the exhaust housing, however think now that it may be the easiest option.

6Boost (or anyone here), do you have a descent quality picture of a wastegate mounted off the turbo housing?

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
    • Hey lads, reviving an old thread.  As an update, since the last time replied to this thread, ive done mostly suspension. Havent touched the motor except for maintenance. Though upon changing spark plugs, found out i had splitfires pre-installed! Updates: - Got me some stock airbox top cover and snorkel to fit onto the original intake. Should be free of defects - Bought a set of R34 GT-T brakes (not installed yet, going to rebuild + respray in champion blue + white 'Nissan' text) - Bought the last set of bilsteins from @Sydneykid and had them installed. Has been making some sounds on the rear but hopefully should be sorted out after this New Year break. - Regreased front caster rod bushings (poly bushes..) - Rear upper camber arms - Whiteline sway bars (BNF27Z 22mm + BNR11XXZ 24mm).  The rear sway bars are a bit short (ive read 50mm else where) but was still able to get them in.  Anyhows, I reckon suspension is sorted now. Maybe replace bushes (do have a set of front upper control arms from SK not installed yet) but should be okay for now. From now, I'm wanting to start working on the motor, drivetrain etc etc. Still debating on the order to go on and what to buy etc but: - ECU ( Haltech or Link ( Link states that it dont support A/T or AWD functions... Can anyone attest to this? ) - Highflow turbo ( ATR43ss2 ) - Intercooler ( Not decided yet, but cant find many good afoordable ones. Toshi says to opt for crossflow Japanese. Bit difficult this one, unless I get a returnflow Blitz from JJ? ) - Injectors ( Any recommendations ? I do have a nismo FPR ( Thanks SK ) ) - Seats - Tune by either Toshi or DVS To be fair, I did consider just keeping the stock turbo and nistuning it. Sat in a mates stock N, that had something like 200kw, and I reckon that felt more than enough. Maybe I should just go this route ahhaha. Too many choices.... Planning a trip down south, so wanting to just clean things up and make sure it gets to and from in one piece. Anything else specifically I should do before ? Cheers lads  
    • Must be for the car’s lucky charm 🤷🏽‍♂️ She runs fine, but it just seems to take about 1L less. Maybe I’ll have the oil sump dropped at some point to check if there is anything 
×
×
  • Create New...